Newsletter Subject

Bits: Who Should Let Driverless Cars Off the Leash?

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Fri, Mar 29, 2019 02:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Catch up on everything you missed from the world of tech this week. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.

Catch up on everything you missed from the world of tech this week. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Thursday, March 28, 2019 [For the latest updates, go to nytimes.com/bits »]( Who Should Let Driverless Cars Off the Leash? [Uber and Lyft want robocars to navigate city streets alone so they can offer rides 24-7 without human drivers to share the takings.] Uber and Lyft want robocars to navigate city streets alone so they can offer rides 24-7 without human drivers to share the takings. Damien Maloney for The New York Times Every Friday, we review [the week’s tech news]( offering analysis and maybe a joke or two about the most important developments in the tech industry. Hi. I’m Jamie Condliffe. Greetings from London. Here’s a look at the week’s tech news: A lot of people are getting way more interested in putting fully autonomous cars on the road. With Lyft's initial public offering on Friday, and Uber’s expected in the coming months, investors are effectively placing bets on autonomous vehicles. The development of driverless technology is central to both companies’ becoming profitable and making good on their valuations of tens of billions of dollars. Uber and Lyft want robocars to navigate city streets alone so they can offer rides 24-7 without having human drivers share their takings. Lyft admitted how important the technology is in its [I.P.O. prospectus]( “If we are unable to efficiently develop our own autonomous vehicle technologies or develop partnerships with other companies to offer autonomous vehicle technologies on our platform in a timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.” So the companies need to test the technology in the real world, aggressively. And investors will want that to happen. But the technology still lags behind the hype. Waymo, broadly considered to be the market leader, has pushed widespread testing of its vehicles for years. It is testing an autonomous ride-hailing service in Phoenix that is used by paying members of the public. But according to a [report by The Information]( things aren’t going smoothly. Almost 40 percent of Waymo’s customers registered complaints in reviews seen by the publication, from wrong turns to near-crashes. “This buggy and concerning service should not be charging money yet,” one customer reportedly wrote. Ambitions to push harder are also softening. “Currently, the company doesn’t believe it is close to being able to operate a fleet of self-driving taxis without safety drivers,” The Information wrote. Investor pressure on Uber and Lyft will probably influence decisions about holding off on accelerated testing, which raises questions about how strictly cities and states should regulate self-driving vehicles. Some jurisdictions are liberal, even allowing some cars to be tested without safety drivers; others are more strict. Mark Fagan, a lecturer in public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, thinks city and state authorities should allow testing of vehicles only where safety improvements are “unambiguous.” Maybe that means airport shuttles, low-speed taxi pods or some other uses that are safe even if they are … well, a harder sell to investors. “I’m on the side of safety and security and over-testing,” Mr. Fagan says. “Rather than letting the market do its thing.” Apple’s media offer has inertia on its side In the face of flagging iPhone sales, Apple [unveiled a digital services plan]( last Monday — new TV programming, video games and news, as well as a credit card. The announcement was heavy on big names. A cast of Hollywood stars announced the streaming service, its news offering included publishers like The New Yorker and The Wall Street Journal, and its credit card is backed by Goldman Sachs. Beneath the gloss, questions lurked. There were no details about pricing of the TV service. It’s unclear how much content readers will have access to in the news service. The Journal is offering just a curated selection, for instance. And there were no details about credit limits or interest rates for the credit card. Still, Apple has the inertia of its ecosystem to fall back on. It has more than 1.4 billion devices in use around the world, including more than 900 million iPhones. Users have bought 300 million in-app subscriptions to services belonging to Apple and third parties. “If they are any indication of how Apple is leveraging their current iOS users, then they’ve been able to leverage them pretty well,” Annette Zimmermann of the research company Gartner said. The company has a history of piling up big user counts. As of November, Spotify, which launched in 2008, had 87 million paying subscribers. As of January, Apple Music, which launched seven years later, had 50 million. Its new services will probably do similarly well, even if the answers to Monday’s questions aren’t perfect. A warning sign of tech recession If a commodities slump indicates impending economic issues, tech may have a problem. Samsung Electronics [warned on Tuesday]( that its financial results for the first three months of this year would be disappointing. It pointed to its memory and display businesses, which account for 43 percent of its revenue. Memory and displays appear in almost all electronic devices, but are sensitive to supply and demand — like a tech world equivalent of oil. There is currently excess inventory and weak demand for the components: See, for instance, a [7 percent decline]( in global smartphone shipments during the fourth quarter of 2018. Samsung says it “expects the scope of price declines in main memory chip products to be larger than expected.” Competitors probably feel the same. It is no guarantee that trouble is coming. But America’s largest companies — Apple, Amazon, Alphabet and Microsoft — are built on hardware use, and a slowdown could ripple upward. Grindr, the spy tool It’s the year 2019, and a dating app is considered a potent security threat. The Chinese gaming company Beijing Kunlun is reportedly being forced to sell Grindr, the popular gay social network that it bought in two stages in 2016 and 2018, [according to Reuters]( which cited unidentified sources. That’s the result of an order from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which reviews the national security implications of foreign investments in Americanoperations. “This appears to be the first case in which the United States has asserted that foreign control of a social media app could have national security implications,” David E. Sanger [wrote]( in The Times. It’s not too surprising. China is no stranger to cyberespionage, and some data on Grindr is highly personal. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or Cfius, is supposed to be playing closer attention to data as a security risk, and has the power to unwind deals. But it’s a clear sign that United States trust in China’s digital operations has worn paper-thin. And some stories you shouldn’t miss Google’s robot reboot is all about software. Its new focus is making robots smarter by [injecting them with machine-learning algorithms]( so they can learn for themselves. Europe adopted[ tough online copyright rules]( They are meant to force tech firms to aggressively remove unlicensed copyrighted material from their websites proactively. Three artificial intelligence pioneers won computer science’s Nobel. They snagged the Turing Award for their work in[ developing artificial neural networks](. Facebook will [ban white nationalist content]( from its platforms. The move comes after longstanding criticism about the tech giant’s failing to confront white extremism. And the United States is suing Facebook over housing discrimination. The social network is said to have [allowed advertisers to restrict who can see listings]( based on race, religion and national origin. Hunting a robocall king isn’t easy. But a researcher at TripAdvisor helped the Federal Communications Commission [subpoena a linchpin of the nefarious industry](. Silicon Valley’s elite are obsessed with stoicism. Its most successful executives are wealthy, but many [seek to endure discomfort]( so they can thrive under stress. Jamie Condliffe is editor of the DealBook newsletter. He also writes the weekly Bits newsletter. Follow him on Twitter here: [@jme_c](. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [bits_newsletter@nytimes.com](mailto:bits_newsletter@nytimes.com?subject=Bits%20Newsletter%20Feedback%20223). ADVERTISEMENT LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. In Case You Missed It [Facebook Engages in Housing Discrimination With Its Ad Practices, U.S. Says]( By KATIE BENNER, GLENN THRUSH AND MIKE ISAAC The Department of Housing and Urban Development sued the company for violating the federal Fair Housing Act by limiting who sees ads based on characteristics like race, religion and national origin. [Lyft Prices I.P.O. at $72 a Share, Marking Arrival of Gig Economy to Wall Street]( By MICHAEL J. DE LA MERCED AND KATE CONGER Lyft’s I.P.O. heralds a new generation of Silicon Valley darlings on the public markets. Uber, Pinterest and Slack are expected to follow. [Lyft Is Ready for Its I.P.O. How Much Pop Is Left?]( By MATT PHILLIPS AND ERIN GRIFFITH Unicorn companies are finally going public, after large gains have been captured by elite early investors. [Who’ll Get Rich When Lyft, Uber and Other ‘Unicorns’ Go Public]( By STEPHEN GROCER, GRANT GOLD AND ERIN GRIFFITH Some of the most valuable tech start-ups are preparing to go public, starting with Lyft on Friday, and the I.P.O.s promise to generate big paydays for the start-ups’ employees and investors. [Huawei Security ‘Defects’ Are Found by British Authorities]( By ADAM SATARIANO Britain bolstered White House claims that the Chinese company poses a cybersecurity risk. But the report stopped short of calling for a ban on Huawei products. [Turing Award Won by 3 Pioneers in Artificial Intelligence]( By CADE METZ For their work on neural networks, Geoffrey Hinton, Yann LeCun and Yoshua Bengio will share $1 million for what many consider the Nobel Prize of computing. [Inside Google’s Rebooted Robotics Program]( By CADE METZ, BRIAN DAWSON AND MEG FELLING In 2013, the company started an ambitious, flashy effort to create robots. Now, its goals are more modest, but the technology is subtly more advanced. [Europe Adopts Tough New Online Copyright Rules Over Tech Industry Protests]( By ADAM SATARIANO The strict copyright law will require Google and other technology companies to compensate musicians, authors and news publishers. [Is Gig Work a Job? Uber and Others Are Maneuvering to Shape the Answer]( By NOAM SCHEIBER Lobbyists are pressing legislatures, and sometimes working around them, to keep workers from being deemed employees and save the companies billions. [Apple Unveils Video Service With Celebrity Parade but Few Details]( By DAISUKE WAKABAYASHI AND JOHN KOBLIN The iPhone maker is partnering with Hollywood heavyweights and publishers to provide broad new services to its users. NEED HELP? Review our [newsletter help page]( or [contact us]( for assistance. ADVERTISEMENT FOLLOW BITS [Twitter] [@nytimesbits]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »]( | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Bits newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2019 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

EDM Keywords (194)

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.