Newsletter Subject

Opinion: The meaning of Bannon vs. Trump

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Thu, Jan 4, 2018 01:49 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: How to protect democracy. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Thursday,

Also: How to protect democracy. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Thursday, January 4, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist Two quick thoughts on the Steve Bannon-President Trump feud: One, it’s a sign of the apparent seriousness of the Russia investigation for Trump’s family and inner circle. The insults got the attention, but the more significant part of Bannon’s remarks may be the “logical, cold-eyed recognition” that prosecutors are building a powerful case, notes [Errol Louis at CNN](. Two, the feud is a reminder that Bannon has failed to accomplish his biggest ambition: Expanding the Republican coalition to include many more middle-class and working-class voters. “Steve Bannon had a chance to be a genuinely significant figure in American politics and he blew it,” my colleague Ross Douthat wrote on Twitter. Democracy. Later this month, an alarmingly titled book, “[How Democracies Die]( written by two political scientists, will be published. It is, as the book’s promotional material states, “a bracing, revelatory look at the demise of liberal democracies around the world — and a road map for rescuing our own.” That last part seems the most important. I remain optimistic that the Trump presidency will turn out to be a phase rather than a turning point in American history. But it would be foolish to dismiss the threats to our system of government. They’re greater than I ever expected to see. One recent example: In [his interview with The Times last week]( President Trump spoke admiringly of obviously autocratic tactics, such as using law enforcement as a raw exercise of power. “The president,” [as Jonathan Chait points out]( “explained his belief that the Department of Justice on principle ought to cover up crimes by the president and his administration.” Trump clearly believes that he deserves to be above the rule of law. So what does “How Democracies Die” — by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, both of Harvard — say about how the country should respond to an aspiring autocrat? The first and most important line of defense, they say, is Trump’s own party. In other countries, would-be authoritarians have often been stopped (or further empowered) by their own party. “Most Republican leaders seem to know that Trump is grossly unfit for office,” Levitsky and Ziblatt write ([in a joint Q&A at the bottom of this web page](. Yet “few Republicans have been willing to state publicly what most of them surely know: the Emperor has no clothes. Fear and opportunism have prevailed over the defense of our country and its democratic institutions.” Unless the Republican Party becomes more willing to stand up to Trump — and [I deeply hope it will]( if he tries to obstruct the Russia investigation further — the next best hope lies with electing more Democrats. Doing so will require energizing liberals, of course. But it will also mean realizing that the current situation is too important for ideological purity. Levitsky and Ziblatt write: “Mobilizing the vote in 2018 and 2020 is essential. But there is something else that ordinary Americans must do: Try to build broader coalitions in defense of democracy. To ensure democracy’s survival, we must build alliances that extend beyond traditional party lines. For liberals, this means forging perhaps uncomfortable alliances — with right-of-center businesspeople, evangelical Christians, and dissident conservatives, among others. A blue-state coalition is simply not enough. This is often hard work, and it involves compromise. But an awful lot is at stake.” For more on their work, you can read [their]( Times op-ed]( as well as pieces by [Chait (in New York magazine)]( [Thomas Edsall]( and [Amanda Taub](. Related: An analysis of [how Trump uses Twitter to deceive and to set the agenda]( by George Lakoff, who, as a linguist, argues that Trump is manipulating the media through Twitter — and that the media should stop falling for his tricks. For an audio version of his argument, you can [listen to his conversation with Brooke Gladstone of “On The Media.”]( In other democracy news ... A random drawing this morning (weather permitting) will decide the winner of a tied election in Virginia and, by extension, party control of the state’s house of delegates. If your first reaction to this notion is that random chance seems like a terrible way to decide important matters of state — [well, that’s because it is](. The full Opinion report from The Times follows. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Why Is Fixing Sexism Women’s Work?]( By LINDY WEST In the post-#MeToo landscape, men want to know how to help. O.K., fine. Start with everything. Op-Ed Columnist [Trump’s Attention Economy]( By CHARLES M. BLOW We want to ignore Trump, but we can’t look away. Op-Ed Columnist [My Button’s Bigger Than Yours]( By GAIL COLLINS Next there will be a comparison of body parts. Editorial [Koreans Turn Down the Volume]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Like an adult trying to converse while a child is having a tantrum, South Korea tries to resume engagement with the North as Mr. Trump tweets. Op-Ed Contributor [A United Front Against North Korea]( By ROBERT S. LITWAK Kim Jong-un’s offer to hold talks is an opportunity for the United States and South Korea to forge a common strategy in confronting the North. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT Editorial [Andrew Cuomo’s Vision of New York’s Future, and His]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD In his State of the State address, the governor offered his ambitions for a more progressive New York and beyond, and of course, a dig at Mayor de Blasio. Editorial [Can States Fix the G.O.P. Tax Law?]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD With the Republican law seeming to target Democratic states for pain, governors are trying to avoid the damage. [Justice Shouldn’t Come With a $250 Fine]( Niv Bavarsky By ALEXES HARRIS It’s great that progressive prosecutors are against incarceration, but alternative punishments shouldn’t cause people to go broke. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Two Ways of Looking at Gerrymandering]( By LINDA GREENHOUSE Stepping into the political sphere, the Supreme Court takes up two very different cases involving the redrawing of Congressional lines. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Training Early for Post-Putin Politics]( By SYLVIE KAUFFMANN With the outcome of Russia’s presidential election in March all but decided, reformers keep hoping for a real contest once Putin leaves the scene. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Learning to Love Nehru]( By AATISH TASEER I used to think India’s first prime minister was embarrassingly westernized. Now I see that he was one of our great thinkers. Op-Ed Contributor [The Sad Trajectory of Orrin Hatch]( By MICHAEL TOMASKY Even conservatives used to reach across the aisle. Today, they’re too scared to try. Op-Ed Contributor [After #MeToo Comes to the Courts]( By LARA BAZELON The notoriously secretive branch of government should respond better to sexual misconduct allegations. Vietnam ‘67 [The Beatles of Vietnam]( By HEATHER STUR How three poor siblings in Saigon became the CBC Band, one of the hottest acts of the war. SIGN UP FOR THE VIETNAM ’67 NEWSLETTER Examining America’s long war in Southeast Asia [through the course]( of a single year. ADVERTISEMENT Letters [Is Identity Politics the New Tribalism?]( Readers respond to a David Brooks column about identity politics. LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.