Newsletter Subject

Opinion: Taking health care from kids

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Thu, Dec 21, 2017 01:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

In rushing to cut taxes, Republican leaders have let more important issues slide. View in | Add nytd

In rushing to cut taxes, Republican leaders have let more important issues slide. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Thursday, December 21, 2017 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist At the White House yesterday, Republicans celebrated their passage of a big tax cut. Somehow, though, they still haven’t found the time or the money to protect health insurance for millions of low-income children. In September, Congress allowed funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (known as CHIP) to expire. By the end of next month, [25 states are likely to run out of their remaining CHIP money]( according to a new report by Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families. That could put health coverage for 1.9 million children at risk. Eventually, if CHIP isn’t extended, almost nine million children — or about one out of every eight children in America — could lose coverage. CHIP isn’t supposed to be controversial. It enjoys bipartisan support, at least rhetorically. Senator Orrin Hatch, the Utah Republican who helped create the program in the 1990s, said yesterday that [Congress should remain in session until its funding is restored](. But the program has become a casualty of the failure by Congress to fund the federal government for next year. Many conservatives won’t agree to do so without implementing budget cuts. Congress seems likely to push an overall funding bill into January, creating uncertainty and anxiety for many families. Congress’s decision to put tax cuts ahead of health care, [writes The Washington Post’s Catherine Rampell]( “has left millions of children, including some in the middle of lifesaving care such as cancer treatment, in limbo.” She adds: “When so many dire priorities abound, it’s hard to fathom how tax cuts got to the front of the queue.” As The Times’s Robert Pear reported this week, [CHIP has become a bargaining chip]( a noncontroversial measure that Republicans can use to force Democrats to vote for other provisions they might otherwise oppose. “In the meantime,” [writes]( Vox’s Dylan Scott, “we are 11 days away from a state like Alabama freezing enrollment and Congress’s inaction having a real effect on some number of American children’s ability to access health care.” As [V. Ram Krishnamoorthi and Philip Verhoef, both doctors at the University of Chicago, put it in Crain’s Chicago Business]( “Our fear is that, if legislators continue to politicize CHIP funding, they will destabilize the entire program. Without a stable foundation of federal money, states are unable to budget for, much less cover, the current needs of their most vulnerable people.” Congressional leaders keep talking as if they regret the uncertainty over CHIP. But they’re the only ones who can end it. They should cut back on the platitudes and make sure children get to keep their health insurance. Trump-friendly media on tax cuts. Breitbart covered the passage of the G.O.P. tax plan in glowing terms. It played up [members’ praise for the president’s leadership]( as well as early reports that [some companies plan to offer employee bonusesÂ]( of the bill. But the coverage also included some obvious spin. In a Wednesday post, Breitbart’s John Carney [tried to explain the bill’s consistent unpopularity]( in public-opinion polls. He blamed Americans’ negative perception of the bill partly on “journalists and politically motivated opponents of tax cuts who have spread falsehoods about the tax bill.” He also tried to discredit the Tax Policy Center, which did several objective analyses of the bill that were consistent with other independent analysis of the bill. “Americans are not really opposed to the Republican tax bill,” Carney wrote. “They are opposed to an imaginary bill that hikes taxes on many people and lowers taxes for a very small segment of American households. That is just about the photographic negative of the actual tax bill.” Carney is correct that most households initially receive a tax cut from the bill. But he’s also engaging in the [common diversionary tactics of the bill’s supporters.]( They wave away the temporary nature of the middle-class tax cuts, essentially arguing that people should ignore Congress’s decision to let those cuts disappear in the bill’s final years. And the bill’s supporters pretend that its deficit increases bill won’t eventually lead to budget cuts that hurt the middle class, as [Bryce Covert explains in The Times](. The American public gets it. People saw the rushed, secretive way that Congress passed the bill. They understand that this bill is a bad deal for most families. The full Opinion report from The Times follows Editorial [Congress Refuses to Do Right by Children’s Health Care]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD The Children’s Health Insurance Program is in limbo while Republicans rejoice at a tax cut of more than $1 trillion for the rich. Op-Ed Columnist [The Great American Tax Heist]( By CHARLES M. BLOW The strategy: Appease the rich on the front end; punish the poor on the back. Op-Ed Columnist [Republicans Despise the Working Class, Continued]( By PAUL KRUGMAN Tax cuts are so unpopular because their disdain for working stiffs shines through Contributing Op-Ed Writer [You Cannot Be Too Cynical About the Republican Tax Bill]( By THOMAS B. EDSALL The speed with which it passed is a problem, but the law itself is much worse. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [The Trojan Horse in the Tax Bill]( By BRYCE COVERT Paul Ryan gets what he wanted. Editorial [Women’s Lives, Cut Short by the Men They Knew]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD It’s time for Congress to fix loopholes in a gun control law meant save women’s lives. Op-Ed Columnist [My Worst Columns]( By NICHOLAS KRISTOF People loved some of my columns in 2017. But not these. Op-Ed Columnist [When #MeToo Goes Too Far]( By BRET STEPHENS Verbal harassment and rape are both wrong, but there’s a difference. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Why Judges Matter]( By LINDA GREENHOUSE As the government’s war on abortion and even birth control mounts, Trump is trying to remake the courts with the least diverse nominees in decades. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Presidential Incapacity: A Holiday Gift Guide]( By SARAH VOWELL Perfect last-minute choices for any person, inspired by Donald Trump, thinking about the history of the 25th Amendment. Op-Ed Contributor [The Real Coup Plot Is Trump’s]( By YASCHA MOUNK The president and his allies in the news media and the Republican Party are overthrowing the rule of law and the truth. Op-Ed Contributor [Susan Rice: When America No Longer Is a Global Force for Good]( By SUSAN E. RICE President Trump’s National Security Strategy articulates an “America First” vision that may only make America weak. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Away in a Manger... Or Under a Palm Tree?]( By MUSTAFA AKYOL We’ll probably never know for sure where Jesus was born. But there are some things that Christians and Muslims alike can agree on. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Beware, Italy. Santa the Invader Is Coming.]( By BEPPE SEVERGNINI Italy’s cultural fascination with America stirs deep feelings among the faithful when Santa Claus outpaces the baby Jesus as the chief symbol of Christmas. Op-Ed Contributors [The Nuclear Showdown in Georgia]( By ZACK T. PATE AND WILLIAM E. WEBSTER JR. A decision on the construction of two new reactors will say a lot about the future of nuclear energy in the United States. Op-Ed Contributors [Attending the Nobel Prize Ceremony After Trump Snubbed the Winners]( By SARAH BOWEN AND MARK NANCE The contrast between their warm celebration in Stockholm and their cold reception back home is a harbinger of the United States’ future irrelevance. Op-Ed Contributor [Why Holiday Stories Matter]( By STEPHEN GREENBLATT A recent study of hunter-gatherers reminds us that our fictions are more than entertainments. Op-Ed Contributors [Israel’s Left Goes Right]( By ABE SILBERSTEIN AND NATHAN HERSH Avi Gabbay, the new head of Israel’s Labor Party, thinks the best way to beat Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is by imitating him. Op-Ed Contributor [How Sacred Is the Confession Booth?]( By A. ODYSSEUS PATRICK Catholic priests should be legally compelled to report to law-enforcement agencies admissions or allegations of abuse made in confession. On Campus [Home From Harvard, Back in the Holiday Hot Seat]( By LEAH YARED I’m the daughter of African immigrants, so my college experience is everyone’s business. Vietnam ‘67 [Why ‘The Graduate’ Is a Vietnam Movie]( By BEVERLY GRAY It is a film about an older generation’s seduction of youth for its own ends. SIGN UP FOR THE VIETNAM ’67 NEWSLETTER Examining America’s long war in Southeast Asia [through the course]( of a single year. Editorial [New York Hot Dogs in a Corn Dog State]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD What strange attraction does Iowa hold for Mayor de Blasio? Governor Cuomo or Senator Gillibrand may soon have an answer. Editorial Observer [A Judgment Day Cardinal Law Can’t Avoid]( By ELIZABETH WILLIAMSON His protection of pedophile priests as archbishop of Boston made me question my faith, yet the Vatican intends to honor him in death. ADVERTISEMENT Letters [The Rushed Passage of a Tax Bill]( Readers recall Hillary Clinton’s prediction on tax cuts and discuss the unpopularity of the bill and the G.O.P.’s willingness to pass it nonetheless. LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

05/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.