Newsletter Subject

Opinion: The Big Tech threat

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 15, 2017 01:42 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: Is the tax bill really in danger? View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Fr

Also: Is the tax bill really in danger? View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Friday, December 15, 2017 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist Seth Hanlon, a former official for the Obama administration, thinks that Republicans aren’t as close to a final tax deal as they want you to believe. “They have many obstacles between now and final passage,” [he wrote yesterday](. Marco Rubio has said he won’t vote for the bill unless the child-tax credit is expanded. Mike Lee has similar concerns. Jeff Flake has reason to be offended by the budget gimmicks in the bill. Susan Collins hasn’t yet gotten what she was promised on health care. I’m less optimistic than Hanlon sounds. Republicans seem very eager to pass a big tax cut for the affluent, and I assume they’ll find a way to do so. But [Hanlon’s tweets]( do a nice job of showing how hypocritical it would be for all those senators to support the bill. Net neutrality. Federal antitrust policy just became even more important. It has already been getting more attention recently. Democrats — after years of accepting corporate concentration — have decided that confronting it should be central to their economic policy. (Gilad Edelman of Washington Monthly did a nice job [explaining the shift]( And although I’m skeptical that the Trump administration will follow through, it has also signaled some concern about corporate concentration. (Joe Nocera laid this out in [a recent Bloomberg column]( The reasons are obvious enough: Companies have become a lot bigger, and their size seems to be [playing a role in rising inequality](. Now comes the end of net neutrality, via a 3-2 vote yesterday along partisan lines — with Republicans in the majority — at the Federal Communications Commission. If the move survives legal challenges, it will free up phone and cable companies to favor some internet traffic over other traffic. Critics say the policy will squash small tech companies and innovation, because they won’t be able to compete. Defenders of the policy — and even some people who favor net neutrality but think its demise is manageable — say antitrust policy can keep the big companies from crushing the small. They also point out that net neutrality failed to create a competitive panacea, since it didn’t stop tech giants like Facebook and Google from exercising enormous control over the internet. “The fact that these firms were able to cement their power at the moment when regulators were most focused on keeping the internet open tells you just how difficult it is to get that sort of regulation right,” [Megan McArdle has written in Bloomberg](. In The Times, [the lawyer Ken Engelhart argued that]( competitive forces and antitrust policy can combine to keep internet providers from hurting consumers. If big companies misuse their power, regulators can swat them back, much as they would have before net neutrality went into effect in 2015. “The good news is that we will soon have a real-world experiment to show who is right and who is wrong,” Engelhart wrote. “The United States will get rid of its rules, and the European Union and Canada will keep their stringent regulations. In two years, will the American internet be slower, less innovative and split into two tiers, leaving Canadians to enjoy their fast and neutral net?” There are a lot of smart pieces decrying the end of net neutrality (from [Slate’s April Glaser]( [Wired’s Arielle Pardes]( Columbia professor [Tim Wu]( in The Times and technology journalist [Walt Mossberg]( in The Verge, for example). If I had a vote, I’d uphold net neutrality. But I’m less certain about the effects than some commentators. Programming notes. The Times will have a new publisher on Jan. 1 — A.G. Sulzberger — and [this Wired story]( gives a good sense of his previous work here. Lawrence O’Donnell’s MSNBC show set a small portion of [our list of Trump lies]( to music, and it’s [about as delightful as mendacity can be](. The full Opinion report from The Times follows. [Columnists’ Book Club]( We asked our writers to give each other reading recommendations. Here’s what Paul Krugman, Gail Collins, Ross Douthat and others proposed. Op-Ed Columnist [Republicans Despise the Working Class]( By PAUL KRUGMAN Unless you own a business or live off assets, you’re a second-class citizen in their eyes. Op-Ed Columnist [Can Black Voters Turn the South Blue?]( By MICHELLE GOLDBERG Doug Jones’ victory shows the importance of investing in African-American turnout. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [The Deserving Rich and the Deserving Poor]( By TIMOTHY EGAN Americans are a generous people, but our generosity comes with moral judgments. Op-Ed Columnist [Trump in the Web of Pax Technica]( By ROGER COHEN The president has come to power at a time when power is passing out of the hands of governments. That’s more reassuring even than his incompetence. Op-Ed Columnist [Donald Trump, Champion of Women. (No, Really.)]( By FRANK BRUNI On his watch, female politicians with White House ambitions are rising. Op-Ed Columnist [The Glory of Democracy]( By DAVID BROOKS Thomas Mann lays down some truth. [Is This Genocide?]( [Dilbar Begum and her daughter Noor Kalima, 10, are the only survivors of a family of six. Noor’s scars were left by the machetes of Myanmar soldiers.]( Dilbar Begum and her daughter Noor Kalima, 10, are the only survivors of a family of six. Noor’s scars were left by the machetes of Myanmar soldiers. Tomas Munita for The New York Times By NICHOLAS KRISTOF Survivors describe Myanmar soldiers killing men, raping women and burning babies in a Rohingya village. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Designing for Access]( By ALLISON ARIEFF A new exhibition shows how design and technology can transform lives. But bringing empathy to the marketplace is a challenge. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [What Omarosa Did Best: Get Fired]( By KASHANA CAULEY Donald Trump has now axed her four times: once on “The Apprentice,” twice on “The Celebrity Apprentice” and again on Tuesday evening. Editorial [Who Will Judge the Judge?]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Judge Alex Kozinski stands accused of sexually harassing his female clerks and other employees for years. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT Op-Ed Contributor [The G.O.P.’s Legislative Lemons]( By MICHAEL TOMASKY It’s not just the tax cut or A.C.A. repeal: If the public opposes a law, you can bet the Republicans support it. Why? Op-Ed Contributor [What’s Stifling Pay Raises Is Also Curbing Economic Growth]( By RYAN AVENT As productivity growth lags, living standards for American workers do, too. Op-Ed Contributor [Cashing Out From the Climate Casino]( By BILL MCKIBBEN The world’s financial community is finally rousing itself in the fight against global warming. Op-Ed Contributors [Is Trump Driving the Stock Market Rally?]( By RAYMOND FISMAN AND ERIC ZITZEWITZ Introducing seven stock market indexes measuring Trump’s impact on the stock market. Op-Ed Contributor [How to Get Rid of a Gun]( By CAROL J. ADAMS Not everyone wants to keep their firearms. Op-Ed Contributor [How I Went From the Governor’s Office to a Jail Cell]( By MIKHEIL SAAKASHVILI Ukraine’s corrupt elites have turned what could be one of Europe’s wealthiest countries into one of its poorest. Op-Ed Contributor [The Uncomfortable Truth About Swedish Anti-Semitism]( By PAULINA NEUDING Protesters call for an intifada and promise to “shoot the Jews.” Disability [My Supercharged, Tricked Out, Bluetooth Wheelchair Life Force]( By KATIE SAVIN The bond I have with my fellow bus commuter isn’t just tolerant. It’s fully embracing of me. Editorial Observer [In Myanmar, Echoes of Past Horrors Are Amplified]( By MIRA KAMDAR Leaders appear indifferent to international condemnation of their ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya. LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. ADVERTISEMENT Letters [‘Sad and Angry’ Over Sexual Harassment]( A sex researcher and educator, a liberal activist and a former ballet dancer discuss Harvey Weinstein, Al Franken and Peter Martins. SIGN UP FOR THE VIETNAM ’67 NEWSLETTER Examining America’s long war in Southeast Asia [through the course]( of a single year. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.