Newsletter Subject

Why I Voted No on the FY25 Budget

From

nyc.gov

Email Address

district39@council.nyc.gov

Sent On

Sun, Jun 30, 2024 08:40 PM

Email Preheader Text

Dear District 39 Constituent, Today, the City Council voted to pass the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget. I v

[View this email in your browser]( Dear District 39 Constituent, Today, the City Council voted to pass the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget. I voted no. Let me explain why. Throughout this budget cycle, the Mayor proposed broad cuts to city agencies, which I outlined in [last week’s newsletter](. As a result, Council Members were largely forced to fight to restore funding for essential services rather than pushing for proactive investments. Given the City’s current multi-billion dollar [budget surplus]( this dynamic was wholly unnecessary. Thanks to the hard work of Speaker Adrienne Adams, my Council colleagues, and the tireless advocacy of constituents like you, we were able to limit some of the most egregious cuts. We reversed the cut to libraries, which will ensure that they will be able to return to seven day service. The cuts to our cultural sector and community composting were restored. Promise NYC, which provides childcare to previously excluded immigrant families, got a $9 million increase to meet increased demand. Additionally, we were able to secure $2 billion in new capital funding for housing, including $140 million over two years for the [Homes Now, Homes for Generation campaign]( to construct and preserve permanently affordable homes. The Speaker, in particular, deserves praise for delivering these wins and making the most out of a difficult situation. However, Mayor Adams ultimately forced through a budget that continues to decimate our educational system from baby cradle to graduation tassel. His $150 million [cut to 3-K]( the promise of program universality. We were able to restore some money to ensure that every family currently on the waitlist will get an offer, but there is no commitment from the Administration that those offers will be for seats with locations and hours that logistically work for these families. He also failed to properly invest in many local public schools, causing teachers in our district to be excessed and class sizes to rise, which I’ve heard about directly from many parents this week. The school construction capital budget also fails to create the new seats needed to comply with the State class size reduction law. He also cut CUNY by $78 million, depriving this generation of students of the resources that were available to me when I attended Brooklyn College. While our communities know that there is no higher priority than education, this budget treats education like an afterthought. We also are experiencing a $23 million cut to Parks, which will result in less frequent trash pickup, a lower level of landscape maintenance, and even more limited access to bathrooms. At the same time, Mayor Adams is funneling money into his NYPD pet projects that do not work towards real community safety including the Cop City multi-agency training center, the 86 member PR team, the teenage school police cadet program, and the Strategic Response Group. A budget is about choices and Mayor Adams has made the wrong ones. Ultimately, this is a restoration budget that prevents funding for essential services from going from bad to worse. But New Yorkers deserve proactive investments that strengthen the resources their families need to lay down roots here and live dignified lives. Throughout this mayoral administration, the neighborhoods I represent have seen their essential services slashed and their cost of living skyrocket. I cannot sign off on a budget that despite the Council’s best efforts, continues us down Mayor Adams’s path of austerity. You can see my full Stated Meeting Remarks and my joint statement with Council Members Tiffany Cabán and Alexa Avilés on our No votes below.  This fight for budget justice does not end here and I’ll continue to keep you updated on further developments. In community, Shahana Click the thumbnails to view full remarks. [Facebook icon]( [Twitter icon]( [Website icon]( Our mailing address is: New York City Council Member Shahana Hanif 197 Bond Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217 USA Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe]( [Mailchimp Email Marketing](

Marketing emails from nyc.gov

View More
Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

23/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

19/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.