Newsletter Subject

ShotSpotter is wasting precious time and money

From

nyc.gov

Email Address

press@comptroller.nyc.gov

Sent On

Fri, Jun 21, 2024 03:22 PM

Email Preheader Text

New audit Dear New Yorkers, Yesterday my office released [an audit of the New York Police Department

New audit Dear New Yorkers, Yesterday my office released [an audit of the New York Police Department (NYPD)’s use of ShotSpotter]( auditory gunfire location and detection technology that the NYPD adopted in 2014. Overall, the evidence shows that NYPD is wasting precious time and money on ShotSpotter and needs to do a better job managing its resources. ShotSpotter claims to be “a proven detection system” that is “faster and more accurate.” But our audit found that 87% of the time, ShotSpotter is sending NYPD officers in response to other loud noises – like car backfires and construction noise. Our audit team studied eight months of ShotSpotter data between 2022 and 2023. NYPD records show that officers spent an average of 20 minutes investigating alerts deemed unfounded and 32 minutes investigating alerts that went unconfirmed. This translates to thousands of hours of officer time responding to ShotSpotter alerts that aren’t confirmed shootings. The NYPD has already spent over $45 million on ShotSpotter and is committed to spending a further $9 million before the end of its current contract term. As a result of our findings, I now call on the NYPD to critically assess ShotSpotter’s performance and determine whether it’s in the City’s best interest before renewing this multi-million-dollar contract. As part of our audit, my office [made five recommendations]( to the NYPD, which rejected three of them and accepted just two. This response was disappointing and reflects a disinterest in using data, effective performance metrics, and transparency to improve public safety. We’ll be keeping a close eye on the NYPD and whether they’re implementing our recommendations on [our tracker here.]( Thanks, Brad [Facebook]( [Threads]( [Instagram]( [Web Site]( The Office of New York City Comptroller Our mailing address is: Office of New York City Comptroller Brad Lander 1 Centre Street New York, NY 10007 United States This email was sent to {EMAIL}. If you wish to no longer receive these messages, please unsubscribe. [unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from nyc.gov

View More
Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

23/06/2024

Sent On

19/06/2024

Sent On

16/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

12/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.