Newsletter Subject

Why Is The Biden Administration Increasing The Cost Of Building Houses?

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Tue, Dec 7, 2021 12:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Biden Administration has doubled duties on lumber imported from Canada. Critics argue it hurts t

The Biden Administration has doubled duties on lumber imported from Canada. Critics argue it hurts the goal of affordable housing. [View this email online]( [Planet Money]( A Splinter In US-Canada Relations --------------------------------------------------------------- by Greg Rosalsky The average American home is now more expensive than it’s ever been. For homeowners, that’s probably great news. For renters and would-be homebuyers, it’s a calamity. A big part of the reason for surging prices is a lack of new housing supply. And to build new houses, you need lumber. With surging demand and lackluster supply, lumber has gotten absurdly expensive during the pandemic. At its height, in May, the price of lumber futures hit [more than $1600]( per thousand board feet, more than four times what it averaged [in the five years]( before 2020. In April, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) [estimated]( that increased lumber prices added almost [$36,000]( to the average price of a single-family home. The price of lumber [dipped this summer]( as production picked back up from its early-pandemic slump and cash-conscious DIYers and other woodworkers decided to delay their projects. But lumber prices have remained [abnormally high]( and they’re now surging again. It’s a big headache for homebuilders and a roadblock to making housing more affordable. The White House has [declared]( that “President Biden is committed to using every tool available in government to produce more affordable housing supply as quickly as possible.” Yet, on November 24, Biden’s Commerce Department announced it was doubling duties on softwood lumber imported from Canada, from an average of 8.99% to 17.9%. Softwood lumber is a crucial material needed to build houses, and levying a large tax on imports only hurts the cause of expanding housing supply. The NAHB — which represents homebuilders, who, naturally, have an interest in low lumber prices — is unhappy with Biden’s policy. “With the nation in the midst of a housing affordability crisis, the Biden administration has moved to slap a huge, unwanted tax hike on American home buyers and renters,” said NAHB chairman Chuck Fowke in a [statement](. “This is the worst time to add needless housing costs onto the backs of hardworking American families.” This policy may be a large tax on foreign imports that increases the price of lumber, but the Biden Administration stresses these aren’t tariffs. Technically, they’re doubling “antidumping and countervailing duties” on lumber imported from various Canadian provinces, and the administration claims it’s doing this in the name of fairness, not crude protectionism. “The United States’ antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) laws provide U.S. businesses and workers with a transparent and internationally-accepted mechanism to seek relief from the market-distorting effects caused by unfair pricing or subsidization from a foreign trading partner,” says a Commerce Department spokesperson. “AD/CVD laws are fundamentally important to a healthy global economy because they are designed to remedy the amount of unfair dumping and/or subsidization by a foreign country.” Drew Angerer/Getty Images The most vocal group in favor of this tax on Canadian lumber is the US Lumber Coalition. If you’re being generous, you’d say it has the backs of American lumber companies and workers. If you’re being cynical, you’d say it has a vested interest in reducing competition and increasing the price of wood they sell to American consumers and homebuilders. “The US Lumber Coalition thanks the Commerce Department for their hard work and continued commitment to strongly enforce the US trade laws against unfairly traded Canadian lumber imports,” said US Lumber Coalition chairman Jason Brochu in a [statement](. The US Lumber Coalition and its allies have alleged for decades that Canada unfairly subsidizes lumber production. Their [core argument]( is that Canadian provinces charge below-market rates for lumber companies to harvest trees on public lands, constituting an anticompetitive subsidy that gives Canadian lumber companies an unfair advantage over U.S. lumber companies. The Biden administration agrees that’s the case. However, the World Trade Organization and various other trade bodies have investigated this claim multiple times, and [most times]( they’ve ruled in Canada’s favor. In 2006, after both WTO and NAFTA panels ruled in favor of Canada, [the Bush Administration agreed]( to pay back billions of dollars the US government had collected from duties on Canadian lumber. The US and Canada signed a deal to stop fussing over the issue for a while. After the US-Canada pact expired, the Trump Administration, in 2017, imposed [20% duties]( on Canadian softwood lumber producers. The administration was given cover to do this by the United States International Trade Commission, which [ruled]( that U.S. lumber companies were “materially injured” by Canadian lumber that was sold in the US at “less than fair value.” Canada has continually rejected this claim, insisting it does not subsidize its lumber producers. In August 2020, a three-person panel at the WTO [found]( that the United States government [erred]( in imposing these duties, failing to show that Canadian lumber companies were paying artificially low rates to cut trees on public lands. The Trump administration was not happy with this ruling, and they vowed to fight it. But, in December 2020, with lumber prices going bananas during the pandemic, [the Trump Administration decided]( to slash duties on Canadian lumber, from [20% to 9%](. Reacting to the Biden Administration’s recent decision to hike lumber duties again, Canada’s international trade minister Mary Ng expressed frustration. "At every step of the way, rulings have found Canada to be a fair trading partner," Ng said in a [statement](. "These unjustified duties harm Canadian communities, businesses, and workers. They are also a tax on U.S. consumers, raising the costs of housing, renovations, and rentals at a time when housing affordability is already a significant concern for many." Biden’s Trumpesque Trade Policies Despite campaigning against Donald Trump’s trade policies, President Biden has largely continued in his predecessor’s protectionist footsteps. Not just with Canadian lumber, but with many products from China and a host of other nations. Now with rising concerns about inflation, many economists and business leaders are arguing an effective way to combat spiking prices is to cut these tariffs, which amount to gigantic tax — as high as [$51 billion]( a year — on American consumers and businesses that rely on imports. Interestingly, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, a respected economist in her own right, made this argument herself recently. Speaking [with Reuters]( she said that tariffs tend to increase prices for consumers and businesses. Lowering tariffs, she said, would have a “disinflationary” effect. Last month, [two dozen]( business groups wrote an [open letter]( to Yellen and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai, urging the Biden administration to cut tariffs on Chinese imports as a way to combat inflation. The letter cited the recent anti-tariff comments made by Yellen, and it urged the administration to put their money where their mouth is. “We agree with Secretary Yellen's recent comments that tariffs tend to increase domestic prices and raise costs to consumers and businesses due to higher cost inputs and that lowering US and Chinese tariffs could help ease inflation,” the letter says. “These costs, compounded by other inflationary pressures, impose a significant burden on American businesses, farmers, and families trying to recover from the effects of the pandemic.” President Biden may be hurting the cause of affordable housing by increasing the cost of lumber. But, to be fair to him, Biden is currently fighting for the Build Back Better plan, which includes a proposal to spend [$170 billion]( on affordable housing. That said, even this ambitious proposal [is being criticized]( for not doing enough to expand housing supply, which is crucial to bringing prices down. Not subscribed? [Subscribe to this newsletter.]( Want to spread the love? [Share the web-version of this newsletter on social media.]( Craving more content? [Listen to our podcasts.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- On Our Podcasts --------------------------------------------------------------- Consider the lobstermen — A tense conflict between indigenous fishermen and commercial lobstermen flared up in Nova Scotia in the fall of 2020. Planet Money investigates how it all got started and how the Canadian government added fuel to the fire. [Listen here]( A locked door, a secret meeting and the birth of the Fed (Classic) — The story of the back-room dealings that created America's central bank. [Listen here]( 2021: A year in indicators — After a tumultuous 2020, The Indicator welcomed the new year by picking three indicators to watch for economic recovery. As 2021 wraps up, we revisit those indicators to see how they've fared. Our old friend Cardiff Garcia returns for this walk down indicator memory lane. [Listen here]( Women, career and family: A conversation with Claudia Goldin — Caregiving responsibilities for women have drastically increased since the start of the pandemic. And with new demands at home and at work, many women have struggled to find a balance between work and family. The economist Claudia Goldin joins The Indicator to talk about that and other issues in her new book, "Career and Family: Women's Century Long Journey Towards Equity." [Listen here]( Also on The Indicator: [The rise and fall (and rise?) of organized labor]( and [Falling down the "junk insurance" rabbit hole]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. [Find a Station]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Subscribe to Planet Money+](. Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free episodes. What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [planetmoney@npr.org](mailto:planetmoney@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Daily News, Politics, Health and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Planet Money emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.