Newsletter Subject

Many small news nonprofits feel overlooked by funders. A new coalition is giving them a voice

From

niemanlab.org

Email Address

newsletter@niemanlab.org

Sent On

Wed, Feb 7, 2024 10:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

“There are haves and have-nots in the nonprofit journalism space. And this isn?t right.”

[Nieman Lab: The Daily Digest] Wednesday, February 7, 2024 [Many small news nonprofits feel overlooked by funders. A new coalition is giving them a voice]( “There are haves and have-nots in the nonprofit journalism space. And this isn’t right.” By Sophie Culpepper. [The New York Times made more than $1 billion from digital subscriptions in 2023]( What We’re Reading Columbia Journalism Review / Kevin Lind [Dahlia Lithwick on the Colorado case, the election, and the press →]( “I have not figured out a way to make dark money in politics — the Koch network bringing Clarence Thomas to their events so that high donors get to spend time with him, and him changing his position on the Chevron doctrine — into a story. Or anything other than a one-off, sublimely well-reported story that ProPublica, Politico, The Guardian, and the New York Times are starting to do. Every time one of those publications does a story about democratic subversion and everybody shrugs — because Who cares? — we are failing.” Semafor / Reed Albergotti [Medium expects to post its first profit this year. Here’s what its CEO has learned about tech and journalism. →]( “When you bring in a bunch of journalists, it goes against what makes blogging great — that you get to hear personal experiences rather than reported experiences. And the economics just didn’t work at all because it’s expensive to write about things that you don’t already know. That’s why journalists have to be paid a lot to get a high quality piece up. The reporting is really time intensive.” (Laura Hazard Owen wrote about [“the long, complicated, and extremely frustrating history of Medium”]( in 2019.) Anil Dash [“Wherever you get your podcasts” is a radical statement →]( “What it represents is the triumph of exactly the kind of technology that’s supposed to be impossible: open, empowering tech that’s not owned by any one company, that can’t be controlled by any one company, and that allows people to have ownership over their work and their relationship with their audience.” Poynter / Jon Greenberg [Reporting on people with extreme views? Consider these questions before you decide to cover →]( Have you looked for national ties? “VoteBeat’s Arizona reporter Jen Fifield followed the money and learned that what looked like a grassroots effort targeting election boards was fueled by national dollars.” CNBC / Alex Sherman and Jacob Pramuk [Some of the biggest media companies in sports are coming together to launch a joint streaming app →]( “Walt Disney’s ESPN, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery plan to launch a joint sports streaming service this fall, giving consumers a new way to access marquee live sports for the first time.” Heated / Emily Atkin [The Daily promised to end fossil fuel sponsorships. So why did an ad from BP air last week? →]( A New York Times spokesperson said the Times [doesn’t allow]( oil and gas companies “to sponsor The Daily wholesale” but did not answer HEATED’s questions about the difference between fossil fuel ads and fossil fuel sponsorship, nor how the ad passed advertising guidelines. YouTube / Neal Mohan [YouTube TV now has more than 8 million subscribers →]( The streaming service is now one of the largest TV providers in the U.S. and [some]( are asking: “How long until it’s bigger than Comcast? 3 years? 5 years?” Vox / Rebecca Jennings [TikTok is full of tryhard slang →]( “With every scroll, new terms compete for space in your brain: ‘orange peel theory,’ ‘microcheating,’ girl hobby,’ ‘loud budgeting,’ ’75 cozy.’ They are funneled into the collective consciousness not because they are relevant or necessary but because random people have made videos inventing these terms in the hope that the wording will go viral.” Wired / Kate Knibbs [Confessions of an AI clickbait kingpin →]( “He defends his choices, pointing out that his life has been tougher than that of the average American blogger.” Politico / CLAUDIA CHIAPPA [Tucker Carlson faces backlash from American and Russian journalists over Putin interview →]( “Does Tucker really think we journalists haven’t been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full-scale invasion of Ukraine?” Christiane Amanpour, CNN’s chief international anchor, railed on X. “It’s absurd — we’ll continue to ask for an interview, just as we have for years now.” Snopes / Jack Izzo [Is 1440’s daily newsletter the unbiased news source it claims to be? →]( “1440 makes over 95% of its income off of advertisements, with a small proportion coming from reader donations. He also explained that the company reviews potential advertisements before a newsletter with those ads are sent out. 1440 is largely employee-owned, with the remaining holdings from a venture capital firm.” Intelligencer / Kara Swisher [Kara Swisher on witnessing the “slow-moving catastrophe” in media →]( “It was no surprise that the media reporters acted like the grandees they covered, preening with the unmistakable air of those who are frequently wrong but never in doubt.” Platformer / Casey Newton [Scenes from a dying web →]( “All the time now, in ways big and small, tech platforms are telling us what they expect the future to look like. And it is not a world in which journalists or almost anyone else now employed in writing or creating has any real role to play aside from training the models that their makers are betting will one day replace them.” The Hill / Ted Lipien [Former Voice of America journalist: “Why is the taxpayer-funded VOA spreading Putin’s propaganda?” →]( “This seems like some promo, worse yet, a platform for Putin,” one wrote back, adding that “clips used in a BALANCED news report would have been in order (if some sort of news were made).” [Nieman Lab]( / [Fuego]( [Twitter]( / [Facebook]( [View email in browser]( [Unsubscribe]( You are receiving this daily newsletter because you signed up for for it at www.niemanlab.org. Nieman Journalism Lab Harvard University 1 Francis Ave.Cambridge, MA 02138 [Add us to your address book](

Marketing emails from niemanlab.org

View More
Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.