Newsletter Subject

Journalism scholars want to make journalism better. They’re not quite sure how.

From

niemanlab.org

Email Address

newsletter@niemanlab.org

Sent On

Thu, Oct 3, 2024 07:05 PM

Email Preheader Text

Does any of this work actually matter? By Jacob L. Nelson, Andrea Wenzel and Letrell Crittenden. Wha

[Nieman Lab: The Daily Digest] Thursday, October 3, 2024 [Journalism scholars want to make journalism better. They’re not quite sure how.]( Does any of this work actually matter? By Jacob L. Nelson, Andrea Wenzel and Letrell Crittenden. What We’re Reading The Hollywood Reporter / Katie Kilkenny [The New Yorker union members unanimously authorize strike ahead of festival →]( “The New Yorker union, which represents fact-checkers, copy editors, story editors and photo editors, among other roles, has been negotiating its latest pact with Condé Nast for more than six months. (The magazine’s staff writers are not included in the union.)” CNN / Hadas Gold and Pamela Brown [CNN requested an interview with Melania Trump. Her book publisher asked for $250,000 in exchange →]( “Paying a public figure for an interview, especially the spouse of a political candidate, is highly frowned upon in most newsrooms, which tend to have strict guidelines against such a practice. It is also highly unusual for the request to come from a representative purportedly acting on behalf of the spouse of a presidential candidate and a former first lady -– especially with such a large price tag.” Press Gazette / Dominic Ponsford and Bron Maher [Leading cultural figures attack Observer sale as staff pave way for strike action →]( “Press Gazette understands staff complained about what was seen as a failure of the Trust to protect plural liberal journalism in tough times. Some spoke about a sense of ‘betrayal’ amongst Observer journalists who have worked at the company for 30 years or more. There was also concern raised that readers who have made financial donations in order to support Observer journalism will feel misled if the title is sold.” The Verge / Emma Roth [Google’s AI search summaries officially have ads →]( “Let’s say you’re searching for ways to get a grass stain out of your pants. If you ask Google, its AI-generated response will offer some tips, along with suggestions for products to purchase that could help you remove the stain. The products will appear beneath a ‘sponsored’ header, and Google spokesperson Craig Ewer told The Verge they’ll only show up if a question has a ‘commercial angle.'” Columbia Journalism Review / Lauren Watson [The before and after: Meta’s Canadian news ban, as told through my small town →]( “The researchers also found that only 22 percent of Canadians are aware that Meta has bailed on journalism. That has turned Canadian newsgathering on social media into a game of telephone—out-of-context photos and summaries absent links to the articles from which they’ve been sourced—that few even know is being played.” CNN / Brian Stelter [How Trump consolidated control over his party and right-wing media in a “cloud of confusion” →]( “‘Cloud of confusion’ was the perfect, succinct summary of the right’s strategy. Candidates like Trump, attorneys like Chesebro, TV stars like Sean Hannity, and streaming propagandist like Tucker Carlson sowed so much chaos and confusion that voters and viewers couldn’t tell what was true anymore.” Reuters / Lucy Papachristou [Forced closure of weekly spells the end for Russia’s independent print media →]( “A few days after the ‘foreign agent’ designation, Sobesednik announced it was suspending publication. ‘It would be impossible to read,’ said Roldugin, who has led the paper since 2021. ‘The paper would have to be sold sealed and labelled ’18+’, like pornography. Because we did journalism instead of propaganda.'” The Atlantic / Gal Beckerman [The journalist who cried treason →]( “I wondered, though, in my discussions with Unger, whether reporters like him bore some of the responsibility—whether the kind of skepticism and mistrust that marked his generation of journalists had helped create our post-truth reality. There were moments when he slipped from crusading truth teller to something closer to a conspiracy theorist willing to believe the most outlandish speculations.” Poynter / Kristen Hare [After Hurricane Helene, “Neighbors are what’s getting us through this” →]( “[99.9]( I think is the star. It’s an iHeart station. They are broadcasting 24/7 with a call-in format. People are helping and asking for help. It’s absolutely uplifting and devastating. You literally can’t listen for more than a few hours without breaking down. Their DJs are literally holding the community together.” The New Yorker / Cal Newport [What kind of writer is ChatGPT? →]( “Old-fashioned writing requires bursts of focus that remind me of the sharp spikes of an electrocardiogram. Working with ChatGPT mellowed the experience, rounding those spikes into the smooth curves of a sine wave.” 404 Media / Joseph Cox [Someone put facial recognition tech onto Meta’s smart glasses to instantly dox strangers →]( “Ardayfio told 404 Media that when the pair did show the technology to other Harvard students and people on the subway, some said, ‘Dude, holy shit, this is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. How do you know my mom’s phone number?'” Wired / Will Knight [Hacking generative AI for fun and profit →]( “Notable pitches from the journalism hackathon included using multimodal language models to track political posts on TikTok, to auto-generate freedom of information requests and appeals, or to summarize video clips of local court hearings to help with local news coverage.” Apple [Apple Podcasts will treat serialized narrative series as a separate category with dedicated charts and marketing →]( [Nick Quah]( on the change: “I’m pro this move. The form deserves curatorial distinction from the persistent talk show format, which has increasingly come to dominate podcasting’s identity as a medium and merge with the digital video ecosystem. The bigger question: will this move the needle for the form and its practitioners in any way?” [Nieman Lab]( / [Fuego]( [Twitter]( / [Facebook]( [View email in browser]( [Unsubscribe]( You are receiving this daily newsletter because you signed up for for it at www.niemanlab.org. Nieman Journalism Lab Harvard University 1 Francis Ave.Cambridge, MA 02138 [Add us to your address book](

Marketing emails from niemanlab.org

View More
Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Sent On

30/09/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.