Newsletter Subject

This is a longer email about the lack of transparency of many AI tools, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot. We hope you will take a moment to read it today, and then contribute to Mozilla to help reclaim the internet.

From

mozillafoundation.org

Email Address

mozilla@eml.mozilla.org

Sent On

Thu, Mar 21, 2024 06:13 PM

Email Preheader Text

Taking on powerful tech companies will not be easy – but it is possible, as long as we are in i

Taking on powerful tech companies will not be easy – but it is possible, as long as we are in it together. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ [Mozilla ]( [❤️ Mozilla ❤️]( [Donate]( Mozilla is counting on your support to demand transparency from OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google on the data they’re using to train their AI models. [Can you make a $25 contribution to Mozilla today to sustain the campaign work required to take on these big tech companies and ensure AI is trustworthy?]( [Donate →]( Hello, Imagine for just a moment that we live in a world where AI is trustworthy, and tech companies provide transparency about the products they build – including whether they’re using our personal data to build them. That world is possible… but only if all of us in the Mozilla community come together to make it happen. The reality today is that we simply don’t know what data the latest generative AI models of leading AI companies were trained on – because their developers aren’t telling anyone. But we do know that they rely on massive archives of web crawl data that contain harmful content, which those AI companies would need to filter out with care before training their models. Mozilla’s recent research looked into Common Crawl, a very popular source of such data among AI builders, and found that such care is often lacking among AI builders.1 And we also know that companies like Google and Microsoft have massive amounts of people’s personal data at their disposal, including deeply personal things like saved chats, financial spreadsheets, and family photos and videos. That's why Mozilla is calling on OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google to be transparent about the source of data used to build their AI models. Understanding where the data that these companies used to build their models came from and how they prepared it before the model training is the first step to understanding how to address the real-world harms that generative AI is causing. Yet leading AI companies refuse this basic level of transparency for “competitive reasons.” 2, 3, 4 In other words: Transparency is not in their commercial interest. Taking on powerful tech companies will not be easy. It is going to take a massive amount of advocacy and campaigning by the Mozilla community to successfully pressure these companies to be more transparent about the training data they use to build AI. Mozilla's campaign work is made possible by tens of thousands of grassroots donors who have contributed to reclaim the internet. Today we are hoping you'll join them by adding your donation today. [Contribute $25 to Mozilla today so that together we can demand transparency from irresponsible tech companies and ensure AI is trustworthy.]( [Donate →]( Mozilla has been leading efforts for many years to fund, build, and advocate for trustworthy AI.5 And that work is now more important than ever as today's AI ecosystem contains serious flaws that have allowed the real-world harms produced by AI to go unchecked. This latest campaign to demand transparency from irresponsible tech companies on their AI models is one way that the Mozilla community will use our collective power to ensure the next wave of AI is for the good of the public. But we are going to be taking on some of the most powerful companies in the world, and it will take all of us, working together, to turn this vision into reality. If you agree it's time for OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft to be held accountable for how they build AI models, we hope you'll consider making a contribution today. [Contribute $25 to support Mozilla's campaign efforts to take on irresponsible tech companies and create a new status quo of trustworthy AI.]( Thank you for all you do for the internet. Michael WhitneyDirector, Digital Engagement Mozilla [Donate →]( --------------------------------------------------------------- More information: 1. Mozilla Foundation: [Training Data for the Price of a Sandwich: Common Crawl’s Impact on Generative AI](. Written by Stefan Baack and Mozilla Insights. Published 6 February 2024. 2. Meta: [Llama 2 FAQ](. Accessed 19 March 2024. 3. The Verge: [OpenAI co-founder on company’s past approach to openly sharing research: ‘We were wrong’](. Published 15 March 2024. 4. TechCrunch: [Google’s Gemini isn’t the generative AI model we expected](. Published 6 December 2023. 5. Mozilla.org: [Mozilla's Biggest AI Moments](. Published 31 January 2024. Connect with us [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( Thanks for reading! You’re receiving this email because you subscribed to Mozilla News. If you no longer want to receive our emails, we’ll understand if you [unsubscribe](. You can also [update your email preferences]( at any time. [❤️ Mozilla ❤️]( [Donate]( 149 New Montgomery St, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA [Legal]( • [Privacy]( [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from mozillafoundation.org

View More
Sent On

01/12/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Sent On

16/09/2024

Sent On

09/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.