Newsletter Subject

Tell Congress to get PFAS out of your water

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Tue, Aug 13, 2024 01:10 PM

Email Preheader Text

Get these toxic chemicals out of our water! The following advertisement from Food and Water Watch ha

Get these toxic chemicals out of our water! The following advertisement from Food and Water Watch has been sent to you via Mother Jones' email list. Mother Jones is a nonprofit, and most of our budget comes from readers like you, but revenue from advertisers helps us produce more of the hard-hitting journalism you expect. We never disclose your information to an advertiser. Mother Jones does not endorse any candidate, political organization, commercial product, or service, and the views expressed in this email do not constitute any endorsement or recommendation by Mother Jones. Mother Jones Reader, PFAS "forever" chemicals can be found in almost everything — including food, firefighting foam, non-stick pans, and stain-resistant fabrics. And these chemicals are contaminating drinking water across the country. Hundreds of millions of people in the U.S. could be drinking PFAS-contaminated water right now. The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has set enforceable limits on six types of PFAS in drinking water and designated two types as hazardous substances, but they failed to address all forms of PFAS, leaving thousands of toxic chemicals excluded from testing and regulation. Clearly, the EPA's plan doesn’t go far enough, and more extensive regulations are needed to protect us from these toxic chemicals. It’s time for Congress to act against those responsible for this contamination and address the public health threat! [Urge your members of Congress to pass the PFAS Action Act.]( The PFAS Action Act would set clear definitions and deadlines to determine whether to regulate all PFAS in drinking water and designate them all as hazardous substances. It would also: - Require the Environmental Protection Agency to limit the industrial discharge of PFAS. - Provide $200 million annually for wastewater treatment. - Require PFAS health testing. - List PFAS as hazardous air pollutants. [Send Your Message]( Corporate polluters have known for decades that PFAS chemicals are toxic, and research has made it clear that no amount of PFAS is safe. More and more studies are uncovering PFAS’s health risks, including cancers and immune and reproductive system harm. That’s why for years, Food & Water Watch has been calling on the EPA to use a broad, widely accepted definition of PFAS in order to protect public health. Now we need to raise our voices to make sure the EPA and corporations are not let off the hook. [Tell Congress you want enforceable limits on PFAS chemicals and you want PFAS out of your water!]( Onward together, Wenonah Hauter Founder and Executive Director Food & Water Watch --------------------------------------------------------------- Food and Water Watch 1616 P Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington DC 20036 [Mother Jones]( Mother Jones and its nonprofit publisher, The Center for Investigative Reporting, do not endorse any political candidate, political organization, commercial product, process, or service, and the views expressed in this communication do not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by Mother Jones. This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.