Economic Headwinds Persist [Company Logo] Plunging Banks Take the Market Down
Economic Headwinds Persist By Keith Schneider and Donn Goodman [image] By now you are probably aware that the equity markets suffered brutal 4+% slides this past week, but the real story of last week was in the credit markets, where expectations of âinflation fightingâ increased monetary tightening began the week rising quickly only to be abruptly reversed by an unexpected outgrowth of contagion from the smoldering crisis in the crypto markets. In other words, the Fedâs cure for inflation may have begun what will soon be called âa banking crisisâ that ignited last week in crypto-centric financial firms. The contagious crypto crisis and lower bond prices (higher rates) are now undeniably infecting important regional banks. As a result, the coming week may reveal a catalyst that justifies a Fed pivot much sooner, for very different reasons, and leading to more uncertainty than any market has currently priced in. The roller coaster of expectations and prices began earlier in the week (Tuesday) with testimony to Congress by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jay Powell. Most analysts, economists, and reporters expected that the Fed would stay on the same path laid out over the past year. That path includes another 2 or 3 small Fed raises of 0.25%, which would put the target for short-term rates close to 5.0%. Instead, he voiced a much more hawkish concern and, given some of the recent economic numbers, suggested that larger increases (0.50%) may be necessary at their upcoming FOMC meeting in two weeks. Here is what the Fed Chairman said on March 7th to Congress: âThe latest economic data have come in stronger than expected, which suggests that the ultimate level of interest rates is likely to be higher than previously anticipated. If the totality of the data were to indicate that faster tightening is warranted, we would be prepared to increase the pace of rate hikes.â In other words, the Fedâs war on inflation and the economy continues. The Fed is insinuating that they could raise interest rates higher and faster than it has already telegraphed. With this, the two-year Treasury rate climbed above 5% and created more than a 100 basis point 2/10 inversion. After Chairman Powell spoke to Congress and suggested more rate hikes (not less) may be necessary, the probability that the Fed would raise rates by 0.50% went up dramatically to 80%. As youâll read shortly, these probabilities have since declined. However, this inversion implies with a great degree of certainty that we will see a recession in the next few months as this steep of an inversion has ALWAYS signaled a recession in the future. Many economists and analysts believe the Fed is being way too aggressive in waging this battle. Most of these folks believe the Fed is trying to destroy demand instead of trying to fix supply, which would bring down inflation faster. It appears that the Fed has resorted to aggressive interest rate rising actions that worked in the past (1970âs) while newer progressive thinking implies that they will destroy the economy (or already have). Here is what a few of these folks had to say: Art Laffer: âProducing more apples is counter inflationary; producing fewer apples raises their price.â Economist Jeremy Siegel, Wharton Professor, March 9th, 2023: âItâs not the job of the Fed to offset a supply-side shift [ i.e., Shortages]. They control aggregate demand. I think their focus on how tight the labor market is-suddenly, a monomaniacal type of focus-is the wrong way to go about it [âItâ being, reducing hyperinflation].â Economist Larry Kudlowâs recent comment on March 8th, 2023: âIt would seem that the Fed is intent on slaughtering small businesses.â My comment: The issue with todayâs hyperinflation is that it is an aggregate supply shortage problem, not an excess aggregate demand problem. The way that the Fed is trying to resolve this hyperinflation is as if itâs a DEMAND problem. Raising rates this fast in such an unprecedented steep fashion is really an intent to inflict sufficient economic harm on households and small businesses. The Fed is trying to make people cut back on their purchases to reduce aggregate demand for goods and services. At the end of the day, this policy does not help create more goods or more apples, which could effectively increase supply, satiate any excess demand, and pull down inflation. Now this is starting to affect the banking industry. (taken from Dr. Bob McHugh of Technical Indicator Index publication): âBanks face three major risks from the Federal Reserve Bank Open Market Committeeâs historic rapid and ascending interest rate actions. One risk is credit risk, where borrowers with loans tied to prime are seeing their required monthly debt service payments rise, resulting in higher delinquency rates, loan payment defaults, and as a result an increase in loan loss charge offs. Add to this credit risk actuality, there is a bogus risk from overzealous Bank Examiners classifying loans that may be satisfactory for the moment, as doubtful or loss, which requires banks to book additional loan loss expenses to fund reserves for projected losses by the Fed Examiners that may or may not actually happen. Fed Examiner overzealousness was a key causal factor in exacerbating the 1990-1991 Recession, the 2000-2003 Recession, and again in the 2007-2009 Recession. The Fed nails the economy from two directions, front (Powell) and back (Bank Examiners). The second risk is a deterioration in the current market value of securities with fixed interest rate yields at below current market interest rates. Banks can have on average, up to 25% of their assets in securities portfolios. Should they have to sell them, if they are in an available for sale category that has to be marked to market, they may have to take losses for the deterioration in market value in this rising interest rate environment. They also might be required to sell their asset portfolios of fixed rate securities, or even loans that can be securitized for liquidity reasons, at substantial losses for the reason of this next, third risk. The third risk is a liquidity crunch or deficit, that requires asset sales to pay obligations such as customer deposits. If the value of the assets being sold is inadequate to pay customer withdrawals, i.e. if a run on the bank occurs, it can result in insolvency for the bank, FDIC receivership, and a wipeout of shareholder equity and the value of their stock in the bank. Now most of this is Fed induced destruction, again, as the Fed has embarked on a foolish, ill-conceived path to weaken and even destroy, the financial strength of pretty much everyone and every business. The Fed cannot fix a supply shortage inflation problem by killing the economy, unless they are irreparably incompetent or profoundly wickedâ How is This Playing Out. Enter SVB [image] In just the past two days, SVB Financial Group (SIVB), the holding company for Silicon Valley Bank, lost $2.0 billion from forced asset sales necessary to raise the liquidity to handle a run on the bank from massive spontaneous customer deposit withdrawals. Just a few days ago, SIVB was trading at $225 a share, a P/E of 10, and analysts thought the stock was worth $250 or more. There has been NO Wall Street analyst covering the bank with a SELL rating. Its market cap had been over $13 billion. At 11:30 on Friday morning, the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) took over as the receiver of the bank. The stock, which at one time was selling for more than $700, was effectively worthless, and its bonds were just about worthless as well. See charts of overnight trading Thursday-Friday. See the chart below: [image] Another chart that clearly shows the quick nosedive of the stock is below: [image] What Happened? Thursday morning, the bank announced that it was selling government securities (at a loss) to meet customer deposit withdrawals. Their initial plan was to raise significant capital to shore up their balance sheet. On Friday, that plan fell apart, and now the bank is effectively out of business. The FDIC taking over the bank requires a bailout from the U.S. Government. This is the second largest bank failure in the history of the U.S. Before SVB there was Silvergate (SI). Thursday, Silvergate Bank, also from California, announced a full liquidation of the entire bank, with the discontinuance of operations, due to massive customer deposit withdrawals. This was a bank known for its lending to the Crypto world. In my view? The Fed raising rates broke these banks, and there may be more. Why? All banks purchase government securities as part of their overall bank balance sheet. Typically, these holdings are a small percentage of the bankâs total equity. In the past few years, they have become a larger percentage. In SVBâs case, these securities were a significant holding and became over 50% of the bankâs investment portfolio. With fast rising interest rates, these securities were sitting with large unrealized losses. When it became known that Silicon Valley Bank may be in trouble, there was an immediate demand for capital (run on the bank). The bank needed to sell these securities and take realized losses, thus ensuring that the bankâs book value would decrease substantially. See the chart below: [image] All banks have a percentage of their investment portfolio in government securities, and typically these are made up of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities. However, when these securities make up a larger percentage of the allowable investable securities and the bank size is smaller, any need for this capital can have a detrimental and, in the case of SVB, horrific consequence. Here is a chart showing the breakdown of many U.S. banks and their percentage of the portfolio in these types of securities: [image] The largest bank on the list with a high percentage of government related investable securities is Banc of America. See some other banks and their potential unrealized losses as a percentage of total bank equity: [image] Looking at the Modern Family and Regional Banking One of the most often used members of the Modern Family by our own Mish Schneider is the Regional Banking Sector ETF (KRE). A key component of the Modern Family, this sector gives a view of the health of small businesses in smaller cities and towns throughout the U.S. that are not dedicated to the large Money Center Banks (JPM, BAC, WFC, etc.). Take a look at the âcrashâ like appearance of the KRE (Regional Banks) in just the past two days: [image] The major market indices were all down for the week, with the S&P 500 down -4.5% and the DIA and QQQ similarly down. However, given the effect that higher interest rates (Powell comments) and regional banking can have on small businesses, the IWM (Russell 2000 index made up of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded businesses in the U.S.) was down 8% for the week and went into negative territory on a year-to-date basis. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also is down on the year now. The S&P 500 is barely positive year-to-date, and the tech heavy QQQ is still in better shape. Given this recent downdraft, the S&P 500 ended below its 200-day moving average (see yellow arrow below), which turns the technical picture of the S&P 500 index negative. Notice that the S&P 500 had been staying above a wedge and has now firmly broken below the rising trendline that began in late 2022. See the graph below: [image] Will this be a Contagious Event for Banks? I am fairly confident that the Treasury Department, the current Administration as well as the all-important banking regulators are experiencing a troubling weekend. Most likely, they are meeting with the Federal Reserve. I donât know how much damage this causes, but remember that in 2008 bank Tier 1 Capital was $90 billion. Today that number has grown to $900 billion. Could this be another Lehman or Bear Stearns event? Of course. But in my view, right now, the Federal Reserve must pivot. My guess is that they will come out and announce that they are moving their inflation targets from 2% to more like 3-4% and will not be raising rates any further. They will do this potentially in order to resolve the potential banking crisis upon us (unrealized losses). Additionally, the Fed may very well have to consider lowering Fed overnight rates in the very near future. The market also believed this on Friday as we saw TLT (20-year bonds) rally over 5% in one day. See the chart below: [image] The 2-year Treasuries, which spiked higher earlier in the week when Powell spoke, retraced most if not all of its recent higher prices. See the chart below: [image] Probabilities that the Fed would raise 50 basis points at their upcoming Fed meeting diminished greatly by Friday afternoon. The probability chart that came out late Friday afternoon clearly showed this: [image] By the end of the day, interest rates on the 10-year Treasuries were lower than at the start of 2023. See below: [image] As an Investor, What to do Now? As we have been suggesting for quite some time, it is imperative to stay nimble and not get married to the market or any buy and hold strategy. More importantly, this type of market requires discipline, diligence, and a strict risk averse play book. MarketGauge and our affiliated company Market Gauge Asset Management (MGAM) can help you do that. Here are the most significant ways we can provide some guidance: - Use our investment strategies to follow a disciplined risk approach.
- If you are a short-term trader, consider using our proprietary trading tools and techniques to help avoid negative situations and identify and invest in positive ones.
- Consider allowing MGAM to manage some or all of your assets. With Dynamic Portfolio Blends that âtuneâ into your risk and return profile, MGAM offers investment approaches that are matched with your risk tolerance parameters. We also have risk-averse fixed income approaches, and our strategy is currently sitting in cash and has avoided the recent fixed income gyrations.
- Please avoid being talked into any investment construct today that does not include a tactical, nimble, and risk-averse strategy. The uncertain markets could get more uncertain quickly.
- Reach out to [Rob Quinn]( or myself donn@mgamllc.com, and we will point you in the right direction. Thank you for reading today. Stay calm and safe, and enjoy your weekend. Thank you for being a loyal follower of MarketGauge and our related companies. Use the links below to continue reading and watching our Market Outlook analysis based on our Big View Service [Click here to continue to the FREE analysis and video.]( [Click here to continue to the PREMIUM analysis and video](. Best wishes for your trading, Keith Schneider
CEO, MarketGauge Donn Goodman
CMO, Market Gauge Asset Management P.S. When youâre ready, here are 3 free ways we can help you reach your trading goals⦠- [Book a call with our Chief Strategy Consultant](, Rob Quinn. He can quickly guide you to the resources that you'd like best. - Get the foundational building blocks of many of our strategies from Mish's book, [Plant Your Money Tree: A Guide to Building Your Wealth](=), and accompanying bonus training. - [Review quick descriptions]() of our indicators, strategies, services and trading systems here. Get more - follow us here...
Twitter
[@marketgauge]() and [@marketminute]() and [Facebook]( To stop receiving this go [here.]( Got Questions?Office hours 9-5 ET (New York time)
Email: info@marketgauge.com
Live Chat: Go to bottom right corner of our [home page.](=)
Call: 888-241-3060 or 973-729-0485 There is substantial risk of loss associated with trading any securities including and not limited to stocks, ETFs, futures, and options. Only risk capital should be used to trade. Trading securities is not suitable for everyone. No representation is being made that the use of this strategy or any system or trading methodology will generate profits. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. To unsubscribe or customize your email settings, [click here](). "Market Intelligence at a Glance + Tools For Serious Traders" [Unsubscribe]( MarketGauge.com 70 Sparta Ave, Suite 203 Sparta, New Jersey 07871 United States (888) 241-3060