Newsletter Subject

"Why do people keep voting against their own self-interest?"

From

lucasformo.com

Email Address

team@lucasformo.com

Sent On

Sat, Dec 7, 2024 08:10 PM

Email Preheader Text

Some thoughts about the question I've been asked the most I got from Trump voters describing, in the

Some thoughts about the question I've been asked the most [Lucas Kunce for U.S. Senate] {NAME}, I’m going to share some thoughts with you today that you might find challenging. If you’re reading this, you’re likely someone who I’ve been able to count on over the last few years, and I hope you’ll read this with an open mind while continuing to share your own perspective with me. A couple weeks ago I wrote about my experience with Trump voters, particularly working people, on the campaign trail. A lot of the responses to that email reminded me of a question I have probably been asked once or twice a day for the last few years: “Why do people keep voting against their own self-interest?” Honestly, I’ve never understood where to even begin answering this question, so I usually just talked about what I was doing to connect with people across Missouri and how I would like to make our state better. But as we all reflect on how to move forward after this election cycle, I think it’s important for us to get uncomfortably real about it. If we think about this question from the perspective of the voters it references, the people who are “voting against their own self-interest,” this question—even if asked entirely in earnest—doesn’t come off as a question. They don’t believe they are voting against their self-interest, so it comes off as a statement: that they are stupid, and that the questioner knows more about what’s good for them than they do. Which is unfortunate, because that’s the mentality that working people, independent voters, and persuadable people are told Democrats have, and it’s one of the things they really don’t like. Even if the presumption in this question is true, that someone would have a better life if they voted for a certain candidate, there’s no way forward from this question that comes to a mutual understanding. Because it comes from a place of superiority. Instead, given the way elections have been going, I think we need to take a moment to ask if the presumption is even correct and why people would feel differently, so that we can reach a point of understanding and move forward. So, here we go… Are people who are rejecting Democrats actually voting against their own self-interest? If you [go back to the messages]( I got from Trump voters describing, in their own words, why they didn’t vote for me even though they liked me more than my opponent, it’s because they think Democrats are ruining the country and have jacked up the economy. We obsess over policy a lot, but most people don’t pay that much attention to policy, to what’s happening in DC, or what long term infrastructure bill passed. They do, however, notice that they can’t afford groceries anymore and that the President is a Democrat. Frankly, I’m getting killed by groceries every month, so I get it. And when you look back over the last few years, being a normal person has not always been easy when Democrats were in charge nationally, so claiming that voting for a Democrat is in someone else’s own self-interest goes against a lot of people’s lived experience. Here are a few examples from my own life. When I got back from Iraq in 2009, I spent a large part of 2010 and 2011 trying to keep Marines in their homes who were illegally foreclosed upon by the same big banks that the government had just bailed out. Banks and bankers at the time were knowingly violating the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) left and right, breaking the law kicking servicemembers out of their homes—many of whom had the money to stay but hadn’t gotten proper notice due to deployments. And it all happened under a Democratic President who had a Democratic majority in the House and 60 Democratic votes in the Senate. I specifically remember these Marines and their families asking me how the bankers could get away with it. Didn’t we all just bail these banks out? They would ask. I signed up after 9/11 when these guys were attacked in New York, they would say, how could they forget that and treat us like this? Who is the government supposed to be looking out for, anyway? Why isn’t it us? I didn’t have a good answer for them, I just did my best to keep them in their homes. And in every single case where they came to me before the foreclosure was complete, I was able to keep them in their homes, because the law was on our side and the banks were egregiously violating it. By the way, knowingly violating the SCRA is a criminal act punishable by imprisonment. Can you guess how many people went to jail for illegally kicking Marines out on the street? You instinctively knew that the answer was zero. Before you even read it. Because it didn’t matter that the President was a Democrat or that Democrats controlled Congress — there is no accountability for the rich and famous in our system no matter who is in charge. And Joe Biden pardoning his son Hunter just solidified every skeptic’s view on Democrats for a generation. Try telling those Marines or anyone else who struggled through the foreclosure crisis that the system is fair or that it works. So many powerful people actively destroyed, actually ruined, the lives of everyday people in this country during that time and not a single one of those who caused the damage suffered or lost anything. Does that feel like an administration that was in a normal person’s “self-interest?” A couple of years later, when Democrats all around the country were bragging about how they had brilliantly saved the housing market by doing little more than pouring more money into this corrupt system, my dad put our childhood home up for sale. That house sat for sale on the “recovered” housing market for two years before it finally sold for $43,000. My dad owed seventy-something on it at the time. He could have gotten $43k for it 25 years earlier. Try telling anyone in Missouri who experienced the effects of that era of national Democratic control that Democratic control is in their best interest. Almost every time that I’ve been at the Hy-Vee here in Independence over the last couple of years I’ve seen people putting items back at the register because inflation has sent their grocery bills up more than they could afford. This doesn’t mean that policies supported by Democrats are bad for working people. They’re certainly better than massive tax cuts for multinational corporations and the rich, which is likely what we are staring down again as the biggest accomplishment of the next four years. And maybe the timing was just bad luck for when Democrats were in charge. But the reality is that most people aren’t looking at their lives and thinking, damn, my life is better when Democrats are in charge. And they certainly aren’t lining up screaming for people to save a system that feels entirely broken. When you are the party that stands for the system and the system is broken, it doesn’t matter how bad the other side is. I remember people on the campaign trail asking me how it’s possible that working people don’t realize that voting for the same people as their bosses could never be in their best interest. Well, the great unifying theme of the Republican Party right now is that they are going to tear the system down. An agenda that has accomplished that neat trick of politically aligning working people with the big bosses. Building a big tent that’s expanded the base of Republican voters in nearly every Midwestern state. The billionaires, industrialists, and many others want the system torn down because they want to squeeze everyday people, the economy, our land and water, and our health for everything they can get. They want to transfer every spare dollar to the shareholder class and they’re tired of the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, courts, laws, regulations on financiers, and everything else getting in their way. Everyday people want to tear down the system because it is corrupt, they can’t afford groceries, they can’t buy a house, and they basically have to work until they die. The response to these voters just can’t be doubling down on “the system works” rhetoric and telling people that “no, it really works, and by the way you are voting against your own best interest by not supporting it.” That’s a recipe for decades of 2024s, because people just don’t think the system is in their own self-interest anymore. Please keep the email replies coming. I read through them all even though I don’t respond individually, and they are really helpful in showing me what people might find interesting and how my experiences relate to your thoughts. More to come! — Lucas [Like on Facebook]( [Follow on Twitter]( [Follow on Instagram]( Paid for by Lucas Kunce for Missouri This email was sent to [{EMAIL}](#). Email is the most important way we keep in touch with people like you. But, if you'd like to receive fewer emails, [you can do so here](. If you need to remove yourself from our email list, [click here to unsubscribe](. Mail us: PO BOX 1240 Independence, MO 64050. Use of military rank, job titles, and photographs in uniform do not imply endorsement by the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense.

Marketing emails from lucasformo.com

View More
Sent On

11/11/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.