Newsletter Subject

A Scientific Reason Why People Suck At Saving For Retirement

From

investingchannel.com

Email Address

TheJuice@news.investingchannel.com

Sent On

Thu, Jul 6, 2023 06:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

It?s all about how you see your future self Brought to you by In this market, it?s necessary to

It’s all about how you see your future self [View in browser]( [The Juice Logo] Proprietary Data Insights Top Stock Searches This Month Rank Name Searches #1 Tesla 532,329 #2 Apple 370,218 #3 Nvidia 332,041 #4 Amazon.com 259,354 #5 Microsoft 226,474 #ad [Q1’s Trending Stock Report, Predict The Market]( Brought to you by [The Alt]( [Markets are volatile, stay on top of Alternative Investments like Real Estate, Private Equity]( [ The Alt - Markets are volatile, stay on top of Alternative Investments like Real Estate, Private Equity]( In this market, it’s necessary to know all the possible moves! We heard, and we’ve hand-curated a newsletter with credible Alternative Investment articles and videos just for you! [Sign up for FREE now]( A Scientific Reason Why People Suck At Saving For Retirement Before we get to our main story on retirement, a quick update on [the battle]( in Trackstar between Tesla (TSLA) and Nvidia (NVDA). As [we detailed a couple weeks ago](, Trackstar collects data from our 100-plus financial media partners that tells us the most searched stock and ETF tickers among retail investors and financial professionals. Trackstar helps us [identify opportunities]( you - and we - might have otherwise missed. It also lets us have some fun, such as keeping tabs on the race at the top: Over the last month, NVDA did something that once looked impossible. Among retail investors, it became the second most searched stock only behind Tesla (TSLA), passing third place Apple (AAPL) by a whopping 74,371 views. More impressive – and maybe more telling – NVDA became the most searched stock among financial pros with 2,067 views compared to Tesla’s 1,612 and Apple’s 1,442. As you can see at the top of this newsletter, Apple has regained second place with retail investors, taking a lead of more than 38,000 views over now #3 Nvidia. Among financial pros, NVDA still leads TSLA, with 1,453 views compared to Tesla’s still impressive 1,381 views. Now, our latest thoughts on the - for some people - rough road to retirement. As we recently noted, [Gen X is absolutely screwed on retirement](: - 22% of Gen X have nothing saved for retirement. - 20% have never saved for retirement. - 56% of Generation X has less than $100,000 saved for retirement. - 55% believe they’ll require $500,000 or more for a comfortable retirement. And, as has been well-documented, the retirement crisis isn’t confined to Gen X. While listening to an [NPR]( podcast, The Juice heard a UCLA professor summarize research that might explain one reason why so many people have trouble saving for the future. Of course, in [our debt-fueled haves and have nots economy](, quite a few people simply don’t have the means to save enough for retirement. As we noted in reference to Gen X, sometimes this comes down to personal choice: Not to sound harsh, but we have to wonder how many spend their extra money on things they don’t need. Rather than prioritize retirement savings, they kick the can relying on their parents or anticipating an inheritance so they can “afford” the lifestyle they want to live now. This is where the UCLA research on how people view their future selves comes into play. When trying to figure out why people don’t save, professor Hal Hershfield asked: …how do people sort of move through time and think about these much older versions of themselves? So he ran an experiment. Long story short, Hershfield and his team studied the brains of some research subjects. When they asked the subjects questions about their present selves, one part of their brain lit up. When asked questions about famous people like Matt Damon another part of their brain lit up. Makes sense. But here’s the most interesting part. When asked questions about their future selves, the same part of the brain lit up as when asked about Matt Damon and other celebs. So, according to Hershfield, “In the brain, the future self looks like another person.” Surprised, they ran the study again and got the same results. Hershfield concluded that some people see a version of themselves in the future that they don’t “really don't feel all that emotionally connected to or invested in,” leading them to “live much more for today than tomorrow.” So next time somebody chides you for splurging on a trip abroad in lieu of contributing to your IRA, just tell them, science! The Bottom Line: Or better yet, go back to basics. For some people, conventional personal finance doesn’t work. However, if you don’t feel that bond with the person you’re gonna be in 5, 10, 15, 20 years, it might make sense to force yourself to save. The best way - contribute pre-tax dollars to a 401(k) that, ideally, provides a company match. Or putting investing into an IRA or some other tax-advantageous vehicle on autopilot. However you decide to save and invest, trick that part of your brain into thinking you have less money than you make. Pay yourself first every two weeks or each month. Meaning every time you paid, skim 5%, 10% or 15% off the top and send it to savings or an investment account. Then, do everything in your power to keep it there rather than withdraw it to spend needlessly on the person you are today. [-facebook-share]( [-twitter-share]( [-linkedin-share]( [-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D585110?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=110503 ) News & Insights Freshly Squeezed - From The Spill: [The Most Unusual Search by Financial Pros]( - [A Daily Stock Pick With Professional Analysis]( - [10 Semiconductor Stocks To Watch During A Potential Tech Pullback]( - [Airbnb Stock Still Looks Attractive To Value Buyers, Given Its Massive Free Cash Flow]( id:2023-07-06-15:55:43:953t [News & Insights-facebook-share]( [News & Insights-twitter-share]( [News & Insights-linkedin-share]( [News & Insights-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D585110?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=110503 ) [We want to hear from you. Let us know your thoughts by clicking here]( [Pixel] [InvestingChannel Logo](#) Follow us on: [Facebook Logo]( [LinkedIn Logo]( [Twitter Logo]( [Instagram Logo]( To ensure delivery of all emails, [allow us on your list](. Manage your subscriptions with our [preference center](. [Unsubscribe here.]( View our privacy policy [here](. Copyright ©2023 InvestingChannel. All rights reserved. 1325 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 27 & 28 New York, New York 10019 Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. This InvestingChannel, Inc., newsletter is for information purposes only and is based on opinion. Futures, forex, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for all investors. There is a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can ensure returns or eliminate losses. InvestingChannel, Inc., makes no representation or implication that using any of the methodologies or systems in this newsletter will generate returns or insure against losses. Investors should be cautious about any and all investments and are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to making any investment decisions. [Link](

Marketing emails from investingchannel.com

View More
Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.