Newsletter Subject

Should You Buy ETFs, Individual Stocks Or Both?

From

investingchannel.com

Email Address

TheJuice@news.investingchannel.com

Sent On

Mon, Oct 7, 2024 06:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Juice backtests portfolios of Trackstar favorites to find the best strategies Should You Buy ETF

The Juice backtests portfolios of Trackstar favorites to find the best strategies [View in browser]( [The Juice Logo] BROUGHT TO YOU BY: [Logo]( Should You Buy ETFs, Individual Stocks Or Both? At The Juice, we believe long-term investing is — and should be — a relatively straightforward proposition. However, this doesn’t mean it’s easy and uncomplicated. If nothing else, you have to drown out a lot of noise to stick to a long-term plan that builds wealth and sets you up financially over time. That’s why we think that — once you have your personal financial ducks in a quack-free row (think debt, emergency savings and such) — your investment portfolio should include room for noise and speculation. Set aside 10% to dabble in, for example, penny stocks, meme stocks and the latest active ETF that you really don’t need to own. From there, keep the remaining 90% in what we know works over time. Investing in market leaders, dividend payers and (mostly) broad market or broad sector- and style-specific ETFs. Here again, only after you set yourself up for success financially. Something we plan to cover extensively in a January 2025 series about how to best situate yourself financially in the new year. Today, we consider that 90%. Looking specifically at how a portfolio of only ETFs, only stocks and a blend of the two would have performed over the last decade. To do this, we use [this]( handy portfolio visualizer, which lets you backtest stock and ETF performance. Of course, past performance isn’t necessarily indicative of future results, but we’re looking as much at how you approach your portfolio here as the specific names. Though, the names matter. We ran three different scenarios with $10,000 invested in January 2015 invested, dividends reinvested over time and an annual rebalance. [-facebook-share]( [-twitter-share]( [-linkedin-share]( [-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D633760?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=123010 ) Brought to you by [Money]( [Gold hits new peak as the Fed cut rates]( [ Money - Gold hits new peak as the Fed cut rates]( Following a bold 50 basis point rate cut by the US Federal Reserve, spot gold reached a peak of 2,687 per troy ounce. Experts predict that this bullish trend for the precious yellow metal may continue, so it may be smart to get in now before prices keep climbing. [START INVESTING]( Continued... Portfolio #1: All ETFs We simply took the five most-searched ETFs in our Trackstar database, put 50% in SPY and QQQ and spread the remaining 50% among the final three tickers. - SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY): 25% - Invesco QQQ (QQQ): 25% - iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT): 16.6% - iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM): 16.6% - Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO): 16.6% $10,000 invested on January 1, 2015 would be worth $28,941 as of September 30, 2024, which represents a cumulative return of 189.41%, or an annualized return of 11.5%. If you just put the entire $10,000 in SPY, you would have ended up with $33,145 for an average annual return of 13.1%. Over the past three months, our sample portfolio and SPY alone ran neck and neck, up about 5.6% apiece. YTD, SPY is outperforming our sample portfolio 21.9% to 16.2%. Portfolio #2: All Stocks For this portfolio, we simply went with the five most popular big-name stocks in Trackstar and, after that, the five most popular dividend payers. We realize that hindsight is 20/20 and damn profitable in this scenario, especially on the big tech high flyers. But, to compensate at least a little, we split things evenly between all ten names. We also didn’t include Meta Platforms (META) or Alphabet (GOOG) even though they’re in the Trackstar top ten, but not the top five because they’re relatively new dividend payers. - Nvidia (NVDA) - Tesla (TSLA) - Apple (AAPL) - Amazon.com (AMZN) - Microsoft (MSFT) - Intel (INTC) - Micron (MU) - Broadcom (AVGO) - Walmart (WMT) - Costco (COST) $10,000 invested in January 1, 2015 would be worth $181,435 as of September 30, 2024, which represents a cumulative return of 1,714.35%, or an annualized return of 34.6%. Of course, this blows away SPY’s 13.1% return. Here again, perfect world stuff, but certainly something to keep in mind going forward. Though, for risk and diversification sake, we don’t recommend this approach unless it’s in addition to portfolio #1 or part of an expanded portfolio #3. Over the past three months, SPY actually crushed our sample portfolio 5.8% to 1.5%. YTD, our sample portfolio is outperforming SPY 32.5% to 21.9%. Portfolio #3: Stocks and ETFs For this portfolio, we created a blend and allocated 10% to each position. - SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) - Invesco QQQ (QQQ) - iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) - iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) - Tesla (TSLA) - Apple (AAPL) - Microsoft (MSFT) - Intel (INTC) - Costco (COST) - Walmart (WMT) $10,000 invested in January 1, 2015 would be worth $61,753 as of September 30, 2024, which represents a cumulative return of 517.53%, or an annualized return of 20.5%, which outpaces SPY’s 13.1% average yearly increase. Over the past three months, this portfolio beat SPY, 7.1% to 5.8%. YTD, SPY is winning handily, 21.9% to 13.4%. [Lucrative income source no longer reserved for the rich elite!]( Rampant inflation and reckless government spending have impacted almost every single American... But there’s one income source that the world’s smartest and wealthiest investors are collecting millions in extra income from — even as costs and rates stay high. And RIGHT NOW, any investor with a brokerage account can start collecting reliable, monthly payouts from the rich elite’s lucrative income source, too! I’ve revealed everything in a special briefing. [Get all the info here.]([Ad] The Bottom Line: The Juice enjoys running these exercises. We hope you get as much out of them as we do. The key takeaway here — for us — is that individual stock picking is hard, but can look super easy in the rearview mirror. Don’t fall for this trap. Even if you made the “right” choices ten years ago, who knows what you would have done over the last ten years. While this goes for any type of portfolio construction, we strongly suggest doing something closer to portfolios #1 and #3 with your long-term money. Set that 10% aside to have some speculative fun with. [-facebook-share]( [-twitter-share]( [-linkedin-share]( [-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D633760?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=123010 ) Proprietary Data Insights Top ETF Searches This Month Rank Ticker Name Searches #1 [SPY]( SPDR S&P 500 ETF 194,320 #2 [QQQ]( Invesco QQQ 106,149 #3 [TLT]( iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 26,690 #4 [IWM]( iShares Russell 2000 ETF 29,583 #5 [VOO]( Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 26,492 #ad [Unlock Daily Stock Gems - FinPro Secrets Spilled!]( News & Insights Freshly Squeezed - [Harris Or Trump: A Cheat Sheet To Investing In An Election Year On The Issues]( - [Beyond Traditional Investments: Embrace Diversity]( - [Tesla: The Classic ‘Buy The Dip’ Story Stock]( - [10 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy at 52-Week Lows]( [News & Insights-facebook-share]( [News & Insights-twitter-share]( [News & Insights-linkedin-share]( [News & Insights-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D633760?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=123010 ) [We want to hear from you. Let us know your thoughts by clicking here]( [Pixel] [InvestingChannel Logo](#) Follow us on: [Facebook Logo]( [LinkedIn Logo]( [Twitter Logo]( [Instagram Logo]( To ensure delivery of all emails, [allow us on your list](. Manage your subscriptions with our [preference center](. [Unsubscribe here.]( View our privacy policy [here](. Copyright ©2024 InvestingChannel. All rights reserved. 1325 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 27 & 28 New York, New York 10019 Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. This InvestingChannel, Inc., newsletter is for information purposes only and is based on opinion. Futures, forex, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for all investors. There is a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can ensure returns or eliminate losses. InvestingChannel, Inc., makes no representation or implication that using any of the methodologies or systems in this newsletter will generate returns or insure against losses. Investors should be cautious about any and all investments and are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to making any investment decisions. [Link](

Marketing emails from investingchannel.com

View More
Sent On

09/10/2024

Sent On

09/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

05/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.