AOC Roasted And You'll Never Guess Why

You have to see this                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 March 24, 2024 Would Hillary Clinton make a good President? [Is this a serious question, No way!]( [Yes, she would make a great President.]( BREAKING NEWS: In a spectacle that has conservatives across the country shaking their heads in disbelief, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has once again demonstrated a breathtaking lack of understanding of basic legal principles. This time, her misstep came during a critical House hearing, where she astonishingly claimed that "RICO is not a crime" while interrogating former Hunter Biden associate Tony Bobulinski. AOC's Legal Blunder In a moment that has legal experts and laypeople alike bewildered, AOC’s encounter with the law occurred under the bright lights of a Biden impeachment probe hearing, prompting Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett to offer a swift rebuke on "FOX & Friends." Do you support Biden's open border policy? [Yes, I do.]( [NOT at all!]( Jarrett didn't mince words, calling out AOC's glaring error and suggesting she acquaint herself with the actual statutes. "It's absolutely a crime," Jarrett asserted, pointing to the specific section of the U.S. Code that defines RICO offenses. This episode adds yet another entry to the growing list of AOC's public gaffes, underscoring a pattern of misunderstandings that would be comical if they weren't so concerning. The Hearing Showdown The hearing itself turned into a spectacle of evasion and confusion, with AOC attempting to corner Bobulinski with a question about President Joe Biden's alleged criminal activities. However, before Bobulinski could fully respond, AOC repeatedly cut him off, seemingly more interested in staging a confrontation than uncovering the truth. Does Israel have a right to defend itself against terrorism? [Yes]( [No]( Bobulinski, undeterred, attempted to list a series of allegations implicating the president in a RICO violation among other serious charges, only to be met with AOC’s baffling declaration that RICO is merely a "category" and not a crime itself. Experts Weigh In The fallout from AOC's statement was swift, with legal experts like Judge Jeanine Pirro and former Whitewater deputy independent counsel Sol Wisenberg joining Jarrett in criticizing her lack of legal acumen. Pirro highlighted AOC’s apparent depth of ignorance on the subject, while Wisenberg pointed out the broader strategy of diversion and distraction employed by Democrats in the face of Bobulinski's damning testimony. The Bigger Picture This episode is emblematic of a larger problem within the Democratic Party—a troubling trend of prioritizing ideological posturing over factual accuracy and legal knowledge. AOC's misstep is not just an individual error; it's a symptom of a party increasingly out of touch with the realities of governance, law, and the concerns of the American people. As conservatives, we're witnessing the unraveling of a narrative the Democrats have long clung to. AOC's latest gaffe isn't just a fleeting moment of embarrassment; it's a clarion call for a return to substance, expertise, and respect for the rule of law. Should Biden finish the Keystone XL Pipeline? [Yes]( [No]( Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © 2024 Conservative Roundtable 96 Cove Road Oyster Bay, NY 11771, United States of America [[beehiiv logo]Powered by beehiiv](