Newsletter Subject

⚽️ World Cup: How Deadly Is The Group Of Death?

From

foxsports.com

Email Address

reply@email.foxsports.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 31, 2022 06:51 PM

Email Preheader Text

Every four years, a World Cup group packed with juggernauts emerges as the fearsome four. will take

Every four years, a World Cup group packed with juggernauts emerges as the fearsome four. [View in browser]( [FOX SPORTS INSIDER WITH MARTIN ROGERS] In today’s FOX Sports Insider with Martin Rogers: The history behind the World Cup’s infamous Group of Death and what to look for in Friday’s draw ... why the Chicago Bears need to build around and protect QB Justin Fields ... and more! It is one of the most evocative terms in international sports — and certainly the most gruesome. But the Group of Death, originally coined in 1970 as “grupo de la muerte” by a collection of Mexican journalists, isn’t always quite what it promises to be. [On Friday, the draw for this year’s men’s World Cup]( will take place and for most of the 32 teams (three qualifiers are still to be decided), there is one current hope and one only. That they can avoid the perilously named group, given every four years to the pooling packed with the highest quality and which inevitably sees at least one highly touted team meet its demise. Maybe, however, the nervous anticipators shouldn’t be so worried. For the Group That-Shall-Not-Be-Named isn’t always as deadly as its moniker makes it out to be. Rather than a graveyard of potential champions — sometimes surprisingly often — it can actually be the precursor to success. [STORY IMAGE 1] The United States will be among the teams hoping to avoid a stacked group and its world ranking of No. 13 — more on the draw format later — will increase its chances of staying (relatively) safe. Yet there will still be some nervous pre-draw moments for head coach Gregg Berhalter, whose team clinched its spot in the field despite a 2-0 defeat in Costa Rica on Wednesday night. There is not always unanimous agreement as to which group should be classified as a Group of Death, and sometimes there isn’t really one at all. However, the 12 Groups of Death most frequently mentioned over the past 52 years have produced the eventual winner of the entire tournament no fewer than five times, with a further three runners-up and a semifinalist. Only in 1998, when Spain crashed and burned, and Nigeria and Paraguay succumbed in the round of 16, did neither of the Group of Death’s top two teams advance further. Four years ago, Croatia survived a group gauntlet that pitted it against Argentina, Iceland and Nigeria, and progressed all the way to the final. [STORY IMAGE 2] In 2014, then-U.S. head coach Jurgen Klinsmann proclaimed that his team was ready to take on anyone before the draw, then described their fate as “the worst of the worst” when they were paired with Germany, Portugal and Ghana. They did survive, however, before losing to Belgium in the Round of 16, while Germany won it all by toppling Lionel Messi and Argentina in the final. Italy was a Group of Death champion in 2006, as was Brazil in the original incarnation of the term in 1970. The Group of Death was also used to describe the second stage groups used in the 1978 and 1982 tournaments, from which Argentina and Italy advanced and then lifted the trophy. From an American perspective, former national team defensive star and FOX Sports soccer analyst Alexi Lalas believes an ultra-challenging draw might not be the worst fate to befall a young and enterprising squad. “The draw matters and who you play matters,” Lalas told me. “But this is a team I still think is trying to prove themselves to the world and the country. I feel that this team can rise to the occasion. The higher quality the opponent, the better they may play. I don’t want a Group of Death for them, but I don’t fear it.” [STORY IMAGE 3] The format of the World Cup draw is specifically designed to keep the best teams apart, but there are some quirks that provide irregularity — which is when you get a Group of Death. Teams are allocated into one of four pots, with the strongest squads according to world ranking in Pot 1, the next batch in Pot 2, and so on. All of the eight World Cup groups will take one team from each pot. While seven of soccer’s very best teams are in Pot 1, so too is Qatar, a favor always granted to the host nation, which in this case is rated a lowly 51. Four-time champion Germany, meanwhile, is in Pot 2 after some uncharacteristic results over the past couple of years, meaning it could easily be matched with Brazil, Argentina or England. Berhalter’s team is in Pot 2, meaning it can’t be lumped in with, say, both Brazil and the Netherlands, or world No. 1 Belgium and Germany. Canada, in Pot 4, theoretically could. [STORY IMAGE 4] Among the strongest Pot 3 teams are Japan, which continues to emerge as an international force, and European sides Serbia and Poland. From the lowest-ranked teams occupying Pot 4, no one will fancy playing Ecuador, which came through South America’s stacked CONMEBOL region, or Ghana, which faced the Americans in three consecutive recent World Cups. The Group of Death is not an official entity in soccer, it is just a talking point, initially a media creation, yet something fans love to discuss more than anything when the fortunes of the draw confer their varied favor. Therefore there is no set criteria, and often an unclear picture of which group, specifically, is the most challenging. “There has to be a recognizable balance to it,” Lalas added. “So much that you’re going to have good teams miss out, for certain. No gimmes. It is fun to talk about but even if it happens, it doesn’t mean it’s the end. Whoever you are, when the World Cup arrives it is time to deliver.” [STORY IMAGE 5] [IN OTHER WORDS] - It wasn't always pretty, and there's still work to do, [but Wednesday's game was a qualifying mission accomplished]( for the USMNT, Doug McIntyre writes. - The new leadership in Chicago needs to do everything possible to help Bears QB Justin Fields succeed, [writes Eric D. Williams.]( - With Opening Day almost here, Michael Conforto still needs a team for 2022. [Jordan Shusterman ponders where he could end up.]( [VIEWER'S GUIDE] Milwaukee Bucks vs. Brooklyn Nets (TNT, 7:30 p.m. ET) Eastern Conference finals preview? With Kyrie playing at home again, this is a must-watch. Los Angeles Lakers vs. Utah Jazz (TNT, 10 p.m. ET) The LeBron-less Lakers face another tough road test in Salt Lake City. 2022 FIFA Men’s World Cup Draw (Friday, FS1, 12 p.m. ET) Live from Qatar, we’ll learn which group each qualifying country ends up in. [BET OF THE DAY] [BET OF THE DAY] Odds provided by [FOX Bet]( Duke (-200 moneyline) to win straight up From FOX Sports Betting Analyst Jason McIntyre: Even though the Tar Heels have made at least 10 3-pointers in every tournament game except against Saint Peter's, they will look to trade 3-pointers for 2s since Duke has scored 52% of their points in the tournament in the paint. Duke can over-commit to a 3-point defense with Mark Williams sitting on the backline, which will be crucial to watch. There’s so much firepower in this game, with six potential first-round picks on the floor. The offensive ceiling has had this total bet up from 149.5 to 151. In a rivalry game, I am inclined to take the under. Toss in the game being played in the massive Superdome in New Orleans which is a tough place to shoot, and I'd bet the under if I played the total. For now, give me the Blue Devils to win straight up. [FOLLOW FOX SPORTS] [Twitter]( [Facebook]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( Download FOX Sports App: [Fire TV]( [Roku]( [Google Play]( [App Store]( [Fire TV]( [Roku]( [App Store]( [Google Play]( Also available on these devices: [fireTV | AppleTV | ROKU | Google Chromecast | XBOX ONE | SAMSUNG Smart TV] [fireTV | AppleTV | ROKU | Google Chromecast | XBOX ONE | SAMSUNG Smart TV] Trademark & Copyright Notice: ™ and © 2022 Fox Media LLC and FOX Sports Interactive Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Please do not reply to this message. If you do not wish to receive emails like this in the future, please [unsubscribe](. FOX Sports respects your privacy. Click [here]( to view our Privacy Policy. Fox.com Business & Legal Affairs - Manager Digital Media P.O. Box 900 Beverly Hills, California 90213-0900

Marketing emails from foxsports.com

View More
Sent On

17/06/2024

Sent On

17/06/2024

Sent On

16/06/2024

Sent On

15/06/2024

Sent On

14/06/2024

Sent On

14/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.