Newsletter Subject

🏆 Closing Soon So Please Don't Miss It - Footballguys Playoff Challenge

From

footballguys.com

Email Address

bryant@footballguys.com

Sent On

Thu, Jan 12, 2023 08:51 PM

Email Preheader Text

Special Limited-Time Offer from Footballguys ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌?

Special Limited-Time Offer from Footballguys  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [Go PRO]( | [Rate My Team]() [Unsubscribe]( | [Sign Up]() [Footballguys.com](=)Special Limited-Time Offer From Footballguys --------------------------------------------------------------- Howdy {NAME}, --------------------------------------------------------------- [Footballguys Playoff Challenge]() --------------------------------------------------------------- The NFL Playoffs are here and we've got the fantasy contest you've got to check out. Our [Footballguys Playoff Challenge]() is hands down my favorite playoff contest and this year, we've got a Grand Prize of $100,000 up for grabs. [Check it out HERE](). We sold out early last year and we're on the same pace this season. At just $35 a team, [grab several NOW before they're gone](). We've even got a killer guide on [how to crush this contest]() by our Sigmund Bloom. Check it out below. And if the [Footballguys Playoff Challenge]() is sold out by the time you read this, make sure to check out its sister contest, The [FFPC Playoff Challenge](=). It's a $200 entry fee with a $500,000 grand prize. Same great format. Thanks for being part of the Footballguys Family and I hope you enjoy this Wildcard Weekend of games. Peace, J --------------------------------------------------------------- [Building the Perfect Playoff Challenge Lineup]() by Sigmund Bloom Exclusive to Footballguys.com --------------------------------------------------------------- The fantasy football regular season is over, but opportunities to test your predictive acumen against others abound in the playoffs. Our friends [at the FFPC]() are again offering Tthe [Footballguys Playoff Challenge](). It's just $35 per team to enter with a $476,250 prize pool and a $100,000 Grand Prize. They also offer the [FFPC Playoff Challenge](=), the sister contest in the exact same format that has a $200 per team entry fee with a $1,400,250 prize pool and a $500,000 Grand Prize. The simplicity of the rules is the beauty of the contest: - Each team will consist of twelve (12) NFL players in the following starting roster format: 1-QB, 2-RB, 2-WR, 1-TE, 4-Flex, 1-K, 1-D (Flex can be RB, WR or TE) - Each team will choose twelve (12) players from any of the 14 NFL playoff teams but ONLY ONE PLAYER PER TEAM - FFPC scoring rules are in effect, so 1.5 PPR for tight end, 1 PPR for other positions - Super Bowl points will count as DOUBLE the points toward each team’s total Last year’s winning lineups QB: [Josh Allen](=) RB: [Aaron Jones]()/[James Conner](, [Joe Mixon]( WR: [Cooper Kupp](), [Mike Evans](=) TE: [Travis Kelce]( Flex: [Mike Evans](=), [Deebo Samuel](, [Dallas Goedert]()/[Davante Adams](=), [Dalton Schultz]()/[Amari Cooper]( K: [Nick Folk](/[Daniel Carlson]() DEF: Arizona Cardinals/Philadelphia Eagles So the task here is to find a configuration of the most valuable players from each team. Ideally, we can create a lineup where there are no better options from each player's team and no better options at each position, but of course, without the luxury of doubling up on players from one team. We'll also have to leave two teams completely unrepresented. I'll touch on my thought process of why this player from this team and why this person out of his peers at his position. Let's get to it. Quarterback [Josh Allen](=), BUF This one basically comes down to [Josh Allen](=) or [Jalen Hurts](), with [Patrick Mahomes II]( ruled out because [Travis Kelce]( is a free square at tight end. With Super Bowl points counting double, this comes down to which team you believe is more likely to make it to the final game, and since the NFC bracket doesn’t feature a team as formidable as the Chiefs as an obstacle, the Eagles have an edge. There’s an argument for Allen because he would play four games on the way to the Super Bowl, but if he gets stopped in the AFC title game and Hurts plays in the Super Bowl, then Hurts gets the equivalent of four games (2x Super Bowl + divisional and NFCC rounds), while Allen gets three (WC, Div, AFCC). On the other hand, if the Super Bowl ends up being Buffalo vs. Philadelphia, then Allen would play the equivalent of five games and give Allen lineups a big leg up over Hurts lineups, especially if the Eagles don’t make the Super Bowl. Unless you have a dog in the AFC fight, rooting for the Bills and Allen is fun, and if the Bills make the Super Bowl, getting the equivalent of five games out of the highest-scoring position will make up for any mistakes at other positions. Other QB Considerations: [Jalen Hurts](), PHI, [Joe Burrow](=), CIN, [Patrick Mahomes II](, KC, [Dak Prescott](, DAL, [Justin Herbert](), LAC, [Tom Brady](, TB The thinking behind Hurts is covered above. If your Super Bowl pick is Chiefs/Eagles, you should probably go Hurts here. If you think the Bengals will return to the Super Bowl, then the five-game + highest-scoring position bonus applies to Burrow too. By all means, putting Burrow at quarterback makes this a “Bengals make the Super Bowl” ticket. Mahomes is an interesting lineup diversity pick because Kelce is going to be on the majority of teams. Mahomes would only get four games worth of points (like Hurts) if the Chiefs win the AFC, so you would need four games of Mahomes to outscore any other quarterback (root for the Eagles to get knocked off before the Super Bowl) by more than Kelce outscores any other tight end (and with the equivalent of four games). Basically, you need an ace in the hole at tight end. [Dallas Goedert]() might apply, but if he plays in the Super Bowl, then the gap between Mahomes and Hurts might not be enough to outscore Hurts/Kelce teams. [George Kittle](=), [T.J. Hockenson](), and [Dalton Schultz]() have the chance to play in the equivalent of five games if their team makes the Super Bowl, so if you have a strong feeling about the 49ers, Vikings, or Cowboys making the Super Bowl and think the tight end will be a big part of why they make it, pairing Mahomes with one of those tight ends instead of going with Kelce and the quarterback from your most confidence Super Bowl team pick makes sense. Of course, if you think the Cowboys are going to the Super Bowl, Prescott should be your pick here, and the same goes for Herbert and Brady. Other Buffalo Considerations: [Stefon Diggs](, WR, [Dawson Knox](), TE Diggs is the chalky Bills pick if you don’t go with Allen, although if you see the Chiefs only playing two games and the Bills playing four, and you feel confident in the Eagles making the Super Bowl and pair Hurts with Knox (who is on a four-game touchdown streak), it could work. [Footballguys Playoff Challenge]() Running Back [Austin Ekeler](=), LAC, [Christian McCaffrey](=), SF The two best fantasy running backs in the playoffs. This is pretty simple. There are going to be a lot of Ekeler/McCaffrey/Kelce lineups. Other Running Back Considerations: [Jerick McKinnon](, KC, [Joe Mixon](, CIN, [Miles Sanders](=), PHI, [Dalvin Cook](), MIN McKinnon has scored in six straight games and could work as a Chiefs pick if they are upset in the divisional round, and one of the 49ers or Chargers are upset in the Wild Card round (therefore, McCaffrey and Ekeler might not outscore McKinnon by much if at all), and you use your quarterback slot on a team that makes the Super Bowl. However, if you take McKinnon over Mahomes or Kelce and the Chiefs play multiple games, chances are you will be giving up a big gap to other teams. Mixon, Sanders, and Cook are all key parts of their offenses. If you have confidence that one of their teams will make the Super Bowl with them playing a lead role and you don’t like the Chargers/49ers chances in the Wild Card round, they could easily outscore the more ballyhooed options. Still, it’s probably best not to overthink this. McCaffrey and Ekeler both have the potential to outscore two games of any other running back in a one-and-done scenario, and both have the potential to go deep in the playoffs from a wild card game start. If you are going to go away from one of the chalk picks, Ekeler is the one less assured of victory and multiple games in the playoffs. Other LAC considerations: [Justin Herbert]() If you’re picking the Chargers to go to the Super Bowl, the delta between Herbert and any other quarterback score might be larger than Ekeler and the next running back not named McCaffrey. Other SF considerations: [George Kittle](=) If you have the 49ers playing four games and the Chiefs playing only one or two, then the delta between Kittle and Kelce could be larger than the gap between McCaffrey and the next running back not named Ekeler. Wide Receiver [Justin Jefferson](=), MIN, [Ja'Marr Chase](=), CIN Much like the running back choices, there’s not a lot of nuance here. Jefferson finished the season on a down note, fantasy-wise, but he has the ability to outscore 2-3 games of most wideouts in one game. The Vikings aren’t assured of beating the Giants by any means, but Jefferson posted 12-133-1 in the regular season matchup, which is enough to justify him in any event. You’re likely to pick even if you see them as one-and-done, and Jefferson should be our highest projected Viking. Chase should be our highest-projected Bengal RB/WR, which makes him a simple pick. Other Wide Receiver Considerations: We’ll deal with these in our flex picks section. Other MIN Considerations: [T.J. Hockenson](), [Dalvin Cook]() If we are going to cite the NYG-MIN game from the regular season, then we have to consider Hockenson’s 13-109-2 line, which would make him the better pick than Jefferson. There will be at least one wide receiver in our four flex picks, and with tight end premium scoring, Hockenson may end up being the best Vikings pick if you are putting in multiple entries, it’s worth considering him on at least one for lineup diversity. Cook was discussed above, but he has been very cold for fantasy in the second half of the season, and it’s difficult to see him coming alive enough to justify the pick. Other CIN Considerations: [Joe Burrow](=), [Joe Mixon](, [Tee Higgins]() Burrow and Mixon were discussed above. It’s not outlandish to have Higgins outproducing Chase, so like Hockenson, it might be worth it to swap out Chase for Higgins in one lineup if you have multiple entries. Tight End [Travis Kelce](, KC What else is there to say? He was so far ahead of the pack at tight end that there was no need to hesitate when making this choice. Other Tight End Considerations: [Dawson Knox](), [Evan Engram](), [Mark Andrews](, [Dallas Goedert](), [George Kittle](=), [T.J. Hockenson]() If you have the Chiefs playing only one or two games, and you have any of these other tight ends playing three or more, they could end up outscoring Kelce, although you’d still have the question of your Chiefs pick, which would likely be Mahomes or McKinnon, and it could hurt you having a QB/RB that doesn’t make the Super Bowl more than having a tight end that does. None of these tight ends have flashed a high enough weekly ceiling combined with a high enough probability of going to the Super Bowl to justify deviating from the most obvious pick on the sheet. Other Chiefs Considerations: [Patrick Mahomes II](, [Jerick McKinnon]( Discussed above. Flex [A.J. Brown](=), PHI, [CeeDee Lamb](), DAL, [Christian Kirk](), JAX, [Saquon Barkley](), NYG As discussed above, you’re probably going to want to play the #1 receiver from whichever of the Eagles and Bills that you don’t use their quarterback (or both if you try the Mahomes over Kelce gambit). So this could just as easily be [Stefon Diggs]( with [Jalen Hurts]() at quarterback if you’re more confident in the Eagles than the Bills and not worried about Hurts' shoulder. Lamb is the easiest pick from the Cowboys, especially considering the strength of the Buccaneers run defense and Lamb’s production as of late. We’re also certainly picking a player from the Cowboys with the team still having a legit shot at going to the Super Bowl. The Jaguars/Chargers game is much closer to being a coinflip than SF/SEA or BUF/MIA, so we’re going to pick a Jaguar. Kirk finished strong against the Titans and had a strong game vs. the Chargers in the 38-10 Jacksonville romp back in Week 3, when we really had to start considering the team as a playoff contender. The Vikings/Giants game is also much closer to being a coinflip than SF/SEA or BUF/MIA, so we’ll take our favorite RB/WR/TE from the Giants too. That has to be Barkley. The Giants wide receivers have been a fun underdog story, but none are truly trustworthy for fantasy, and Barkley had 133 total yards, eight receptions, and a score in the narrow loss to the Vikings in Week 16. Other PHI Considerations: [Jalen Hurts](), [Miles Sanders](=), Devonta Smith Hurts and Sanders are discussed above. Smith outsourcing Brown wouldn’t be a surprise in the least bit, and again, if you are entering multiple lineups, you might want to include Smith on one. Other DAL Considerations: [Dak Prescott](, [Dalton Schultz]() Both are discussed above. It’s possible that Lamb is still the best Cowboys pick over Prescott even in the event that the team goes to the Super Bowl because of Prescott’s lower weekly ceiling than many of the other quarterbacks in the playoffs. Other JAX Considerations: [Travis Etienne](), [Evan Engram]() Etienne over Kirk could be the right call. The Jaguars had a great day on the ground in the 38-10 win over the Chargers, although it was [James Robinson]() who had the bigger day. Engram has some allure with the tight end premium scoring, but he was quiet in the first matchup and has been quiet again lately after a big outburst in Weeks 14-16 Other NYG Considerations: None Kicker [Justin Tucker](=), BAL The best kicker in the game, and if the Ravens can upset the Bengals, it will probably be a low-scoring game with a lot of defensive stops and field goal attempts. Other Kicker Considerations: [Ryan Succop](), TB, [Jason Sanders](=), MIA, [Jason Myers](), SEA If you think the Dolphins or Seahawks are poised to pull an upset, consider their kicker, but then again, if you think they are going to pull off an upset, you might want to change some of the picks above. Tampa Bay, like Baltimore, is one of the two teams left after using ten players with the best chance of advancing, so Succop is a consideration, but he’s not as compelling as Tucker. Other BAL Considerations: [Mark Andrews](, BAL If you like the Ravens to upset the Bengals, plugging in Andrews at flex over Kirk, Lamb, or Barkley (whichever you are least confident in to advance on Wild Card Weekend) would make sense, especially if [Lamar Jackson](=) is going to be back, which is the only way you could pick the Ravens over the Bengals. D/ST Tampa Bay If the Bucs can win as a home dog against the Cowboys, it probably won’t be on the back of their offense, which is one of the worst in the league. The defense will have to force some turnovers and otherwise swing a game that could hinge on the Cowboys being tight, considering their recent playoff history and Mike McCarthy’s record of playoff failures. Other D/ST Considerations: Miami, Seattle If you like the Dolphins or Seahawks to pull an upset, you could plug their D/ST in here over the Bucs, but again, if you felt that way, you’re likely putting in [Ken Walker III]() or [Tyreek Hill]() in one of your flex spots. Other TB Considerations: [Tom Brady](, [Chris Godwin](, [Mike Evans](=) If you see a magical run coming for this team, consider Brady at quarterback or one of the receivers as a flex. Godwin is the safer pick, but Evans did win leagues for folks in Week 17. No Players Chosen: Seattle, Miami Seattle wasn’t even close to San Francisco in either matchup. The chances of [Tua Tagovailoa]() don’t look too good, so Miami is going to have trouble hanging with Buffalo. [Footballguys Playoff Challenge]() [Joe Bryant - Guide - Footballguys.com](=) Thank you for subscribing to our Footballguys Daily Update Email! You're subscribed as {EMAIL} To unsubscribe, click [here](. * Sportsguys * 118 N. Peters Rd., Suite 208 * Knoxville[,]( TN 37923 *

EDM Keywords (230)

year worth worst worried win wideouts whichever way want vikings victory use upset two turnovers tucker try touch titans time think test teams team te task take swap surprise succop subscribing subscribed strength still st sold since simplicity sheet see season seahawks scored score say sanders rules return record receivers really read ravens quiet question quarterbacks quarterback putting pull production probably prescott potential possible positions position poised please plays playoffs playing players player play picks picking pick person peers part pack pace overthink outscore outlandish opportunities one offenses offense obstacle nuance none need much mixon mistakes miss might miami means mckinnon mccaffrey many making makes make majority mahomes luxury lot look lineup likely like league lately late larger lamb knox kittle kicker kelce justify jefferson jaguars hope hole higgins hesitate herbert hands hand ground got good gone going goes go giving giants get gap game fun friends formidable format force folks flex flashed find ffpc felt feature fantasy exact event evans equivalent enter enough enjoy else ekeler effect edge easily eagles doubling double done dolphins dog discussed difficult delta defense deal crush create cowboys covered course count could cook contest consist consideration configuration confident confidence compelling comes cold coinflip cite choice chiefs check chase chargers change chances chance burrow bucs brady bills bengals believe beauty beating barkley back assured argument andrews also allure allen afc advancing advance ace ability 49ers 35

Marketing emails from footballguys.com

View More
Sent On

23/02/2024

Sent On

19/02/2024

Sent On

13/02/2024

Sent On

12/02/2024

Sent On

12/02/2024

Sent On

11/02/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.