Newsletter Subject

#1 worst fish for your HEART (tuna vs salmon vs...?)

From

fireflyengage.com

Email Address

inform@ijr.com

Sent On

Sun, Apr 28, 2024 12:10 AM

Email Preheader Text

Sponsorships like below enable us to continue to bring you the latest news and information free of c

[Having trouble viewing this message? Click here to view online]( Sponsorships like below enable us to continue to bring you the latest news and information free of charge. Please note that the below message reflects the opinions and representations of the advertiser alone, and not necessarily the opinion or editorial positions of the Independent Journal Review. [independent-journal-review]( Eating wild-caught fish is good for your heart… right? WRONG. According to Dr. Sam Walters - one of America’s #1 heart specialists - there’s ONE fish you should avoid like the plague. This so-called “healthy fish” is contaminated with toxic chemicals… that are literally DEADLY for your heart. Yet 97% of Americans eat it at least once a week. Try to guess which one it is: [1. Tilapia 2. Tuna 3. Atlantic Salmon 4. Sardines]( So, click on your guess… Or tap below to get the correct answer from Dr. Sam Walters himself: [>> Never eat THIS fish (it’s DEADLY for your heart)]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2023. [ijr.com]( All rights reserved. | [Privacy Policy]( IJR | 108 South Washington Street | Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Sponsorships like the above enable us to continue to bring you the latest news and information free of charge. Please note that the above message reflects the opinions and representations of the advertiser alone, and not necessarily the opinion or editorial positions of Independent Journal Review. If you do not want to receive these emails [unsubscribe]( [Link](

Marketing emails from fireflyengage.com

View More
Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

09/05/2024

Sent On

20/04/2024

Sent On

18/04/2024

Sent On

05/04/2024

Sent On

01/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.