Newsletter Subject

Bananas, Loans, and Defaults 🔥

From

failory.com

Email Address

nico@failory.com

Sent On

Thu, Oct 3, 2024 06:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

How Greenikk’s unpaid loans led to their shutdown.

How Greenikk’s unpaid loans led to their shutdown.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 [Listen Online]( | [Read Online]( Bananas, Loans, and Defaults How Greenikk’s unpaid loans led to their shutdown. [Nicolás Cerdeira]( [like]( [fb]( [fb]( [fb]( [fb](mailto:?subject=Post%20from%20Failory&body=Bananas%2C%20Loans%2C%20and%20Defaults%3A%20How%20Greenikk%E2%80%99s%20unpaid%20loans%20led%20to%20their%20shutdown.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fnewsletter.failory.com%2Fp%2Fbananas-loans-and-defaults) Hey — It’s Nico. Welcome to another Failory edition. This issue takes 5 minutes to read. These are the 5 most important things: - Greenikk, an agritech startup, [has shut down]( — learn why below. - Cowboy Ventures shared [what they’re excited about this Q4](. - Open-source data orchestration platform Kestra published their [$8M seed deck](. - [Y Combinator is facing criticism]( for backing a cloned AI startup. - Product Hunt is not what it used to be and [people are starting to notice]( — learn what’s wrong below. All this, brought to you by [Corporate Sunsetting](, the new way to shut down your company. Be Free of Business Liabilities AD Do you have a failed company? Dispose of it easily – including all liabilities. In just minutes. [Corporate Sunsetting](: The better way to shut down your company. Unload your company easily. Our automated process enables the disposal of your company quickly and painlessly. You can focus on what’s next instead of wasting time on the past. [Click here]( to see how it works. [Learn More →]( This Week In Startups 🔗 Resources A framework on how [vertical startups can approach product-market fit.]( Cowboy Ventures shared [what they’re excited about this Q4](. Open-source data orchestration platform Kestra published their [$8M seed deck](. Carta data highlights new [fundraising advice for startups]( in 2024. Sam Lessin on why the [SaaS era is over](. 📰 News [Fidelity cut X's valuation]( by 79% since Elon Musk's purchase. [Y Combinator faces criticism]( for backing a cloned AI startup. [SoftBank to invest $500M]( in OpenAI. LGBTQ+ social app [Lex was acquired by 9count](. Payments infrastructure startup Moov has [laid off up to 50 employees](. 💸 Fundraising [11x.ai]([raises $50M]( for its AI sales reps agents. Food delivery app [HungryPanda raises $50M at a 500M]( valuation. Event booking platform [EVA raises $2M](to expand to more US cities. YC-backed startup [Vector raises $2.6M](for its B2B lead generation platform. Fail(St)ory The Banana Platform A few days ago, Greenikk, an agritech startup, [announced its decision to shut down]( operations. Launched in 2020, Greenikk aimed to give banana farmers a new way to thrive by offering tools, resources, and market connections all through a digital platform. Despite the early excitement, things took a sharp turn as funding challenges, loan defaults, and low revenue growth forced the company to shut down. What Was Greenikk: Greenikk, founded by Naushad and Previn Jacob, aimed to build a digital ecosystem around banana cultivation. Their platform was tailored specifically for banana farmers, providing them with financial aid, seeds, expert advice on crops, insurance coverage, agricultural supplies, and connections to markets. Their services cover everything from production to sales, both within the country and internationally. Despite this ambitious vision, the company faced increasing challenges. Greenikk raised around $1 million in funding and initially planned to secure a larger Series A round of $5 million. But market conditions shifted, and raising that crucial next round became impossible. The Numbers: - 📅 Founded in 2020. - 💰 Raised around $1 million in total. - 🍌 Built a digital platform to support banana farmers. - 📉 Struggled with loan defaults and slow revenue growth, leading to a shutdown in 2024. Reasons For Failure: - Funding Challenges: Greenikk was hit hard by shifting market conditions. They initially raised capital in 2022 when AgriTech was booming, but by the time they were ready to scale, investor sentiment had cooled. This created a funding gap they couldn’t bridge, which was critical to their survival. As Naushad put it, “We chased the wrong metrics to grow and scale up.” - Loan Defaults: One of the key services Greenikk offered was access to credit for farmers. Unfortunately, this became a major source of their troubles. Farmers were defaulting on loans, and Greenikk struggled to recover the funds. This issue isn’t unique to Greenikk—other agritech startups like [ReshaMandi]( also struggled with collecting payments, contributing to their collapse. - Low Revenues: While Greenikk was providing much-needed services to farmers, it wasn’t generating enough revenue to sustain itself. Their model of providing support and market access wasn't scaling as expected. Naushad highlighted that while the company could have survived as a low-revenue business, that wasn’t the vision investors bought into. Greenikk had set its sights on becoming a scalable, high-impact player in the agritech space—something they ultimately couldn’t achieve. Trend The Fall of Product Hunt Last week, Nico Jeannen, an indie maker and longtime user of [Product Hunt](, shared a long tweet that caught the attention of many in the startup community. [tw profile: Nico] Nico @nico_jeannen [tw] Fuck you @ProductHunt 💩🖕 I will probably get banned from there because of this post, but fuck it, it's time to stop lying to your users First, @iamjasonlevin showed how it was on the inside (imagine the CTO not knowing the #1 person in the audience. Still not sure if it was… x.com/i/web/status/1… [tw profile: Jason Levin] Jason Levin @iamjasonlevin Found out Product Hunt CTO didn’t know who @levelsio is so I just quit on the spot. Into the unknown we go. 11:12 AM • Sep 29, 2024 903 Likes 64 Retweets 209 Replies Jeannen expressed frustration over the direction Product Hunt has taken, particularly after his latest app failed to get featured. His thoughts echo what many have been feeling for a while now: that Product Hunt is no longer the vibrant, indie-focused platform it used to be. Why It Matters: - A VC Playground: Product Hunt used to be a space where anyone could launch a project, get upvoted, and maybe even win the prestigious "Product of the Day" badge. Today, it seems dominated by VC-backed startups with big advertising budgets. - Declining Traffic: Product Hunt's traffic has dropped significantly, going from 2 million monthly visitors in 2023 to just 800,000 in 2024. I used to enter daily — now I don’t remember the last time I visited the site. - Pay-to-Play: More and more, startups are paying hefty sums to get featured, turning what was once a community-driven platform into something more transactional. The Evolution of Product Hunt: Product Hunt has long been a go-to place for indie makers, startups, and tech enthusiasts to showcase their latest projects. Founded in 2014, it quickly became the heart of the startup ecosystem, where new tools and apps gained visibility through community upvotes. The competition was tough but fair, and anyone, regardless of their resources, had a shot at standing out. However, things began to shift after the platform was acquired by [AngelList]( in 2017. The focus gradually moved away from indie makers towards larger, VC-backed startups. This change didn’t happen overnight but became more noticeable as the years went by. In the early days, a small side project could capture the community's attention and rise to the top. Makers would post their latest creations, whether or not they planned to monetize them. This spontaneity kept Product Hunt interesting and gave it a unique charm. There was a genuine sense of discovery, with new and quirky projects popping up daily. But as Jeannen pointed out, now the platform feels more like browsing a directory of polished, investor-driven products, lacking the fun and community engagement that once made it special. The VC Takeover: The increasing dominance of venture-backed startups has shifted the dynamics on Product Hunt. These companies have the budgets to pay for expensive ads, which indie makers simply can't compete with. Product Hunt now charges $55 just to show an ad to 1,000 people. This is very expensive, but for VC-backed startups, it is a worthwhile investment. According to Jeannen, the “Product of the Day” badge is still seen as an important social proof among investors. Therefore, if you are a VC-backed startup, spending a couple of thousands to promote your startup in Product Hunt and increase your chances of winning the badge is a good investment. But this pay-to-play approach is alienating the community that once made Product Hunt thrive. My Experience with Product Hunt: I've been a long-time user of Product Hunt and have launched several products there over the years. Back in 2017, when I first launched Failory, it earned the "Product of the Day" badge with 900 upvotes. This was a pivotal moment for Failory as it helped validate the concept. The response showed me there was real interest in the idea and motivated me to keep building it. At that time, Product Hunt was a place where indie makers had a fair shot. If you had a solid product and a bit of luck, getting the "Product of the Day" badge felt achievable. But today, I’m pretty sure Failory wouldn’t even make it to the front page. There’s no longer much room for makers without VC backing or the funds for expensive marketing. Product Hunt just isn’t what it used to be—and that’s a real shame. So, what do you think? Do you still use Product Hunt? [✅ Yes, it is still a great way to find new startups.]( [❌ No, it is full of sponsored startups nowadays.]( Help Me Improve Failory How Was Today's Newsletter? If this issue was a startup, how would you rate it? [🚀 Launches to the moon!]( [🤔 Room for a pivot]( [💀 Crashes and burns]( That's all of this edition. Cheers, Nico Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © 2024 Failory 1309 Coffeen Avenue Ste 1200, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, United States of America [[beehiiv logo]Powered by beehiiv]( [Terms of Service](

Marketing emails from failory.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.