Newsletter Subject

How JFK destroyed Nixon on TV

From

everydayspy.com

Email Address

everydayspy@email.everydayspy.com

Sent On

Mon, Jun 17, 2024 09:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

And how you can decode the upcoming debates Greetings Everyday Spy, In 1960, John F. Kennedy and Ric

And how you can decode the upcoming debates Greetings Everyday Spy, In 1960, John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon had the first-ever TV presidential debate. JFK was ready to bring it. He had a sixth sense for realizing the power that the new platform of television held. Nixon, not so much. Kennedy: - Looked strong and healthy - Arrived early to prepare - Used TV to his advantage. He looked and spoke right at the camera, so people at home felt like he was talking to them. - Clearly outlined his plans as President. He was good at pointing the problems of the current administration. Nixon, on the other hand: - Looked tired and sick. - Was busy and didn't get ready as much. - Often looked at people in the room, not the TV watchers. - Seemed unsure and agreed with Kennedy a lot, so he didn't look as strong. The debate was watched by about 70 million people, which was a huge audience at the time. JFK won over the American public with polished performance and he went on to beat Nixon in the election. Today, political debates are more like watching kids talk trash at the playground. The next presidential debate will be the same, if not worse. You probably won't see well-spoken, charming personalities. Instead, you'll see insults, avoiding questions, and vague promises. It's your job to decode the propaganda so you can know what they're really saying. Decoding Debates teaches you to interpret speeches and the through the mental lens of a spy. Using real-world examples and simple language, Decoding Debates unveils [the secret strategies political leaders use against you every day.]( And when you understand how it works, you can even use these methods at work… Making any adversary look like a clueless Nixon. [Get Decoding Debates here]( and never fall for politicians' and advertisers' tricks again. Godspeed, #EverydaySpy P.S. Politicians exploit flaws in how we follow logic, process information, and make decisions. Decoding Debates shows you exactly how they do it so that you beat them at their own game. [Get it here]( and be ready to [decipher all of the political lies heading your way this year.]( Andrew Bustamante, Founder of EverydaySpy.com, is a former covert CIA Intelligence officer, decorated US Air Force Combat Veteran, and respected Fortune 500 senior advisor. Learn more from Andrew on his Podcast (The Everyday Espionage Podcast) and by following @EverydaySpy on your favorite social media platform. This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Don't want to receive these emails anymore? [Unsubscribe]( EverydaySpy, 411 Walnut St. #20309, Green Cove Springs, FL 32043

EDM Keywords (0)

Marketing emails from everydayspy.com

View More
Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.