Newsletter Subject

The Ponzi Market... And The Poster Child of Indefensible Market Positions

From

empirefinancialresearch.com

Email Address

wtilson@exct.empirefinancialresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Nov 23, 2021 09:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

It's so easy to want to call this a Ponzi market... Ponzi, of course, refers to Charles Ponzi, the 1

It's so easy to want to call this a Ponzi market... Ponzi, of course, refers to Charles Ponzi, the 1920s swindler whose claim to infamy was promising big, fast investment gains, and did... but only because he would funnel money from new investors to old investors. The catch is that the scheme needs a steady […] Not rendering correctly? View this e-mail as a web page [here](. [Empire Financial Daily] The Ponzi Market... And The Poster Child of Indefensible Market Positions By Herb Greenberg It's so easy to want to call this a Ponzi market... Ponzi, of course, refers to Charles Ponzi, the 1920s swindler whose claim to infamy was promising big, fast investment gains, and did... but only because he would funnel money from new investors to old investors. The catch is that the scheme needs a steady supply of suckers – in the form of new investors – to buy in. I couldn't help but think of that when I was writing [Friday's column]( which mentioned venture capitalist Fred Wilson's comment on the amount of money flowing into funds designed to fund the riskiest of companies... I think they are being delusional, comforted by the likelihood that someone will come along and pay a higher price in the next round. But it seems that person may also be delusional. Because when you model things out, the numbers just don't add up. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Angel investor Jeff Brown finally opens the curtain]( Jeff Brown has identified 12 unicorns and decacorns. Now, he's finally going to show you how to invest before companies go public... even if you're not an accredited investor. [Click here]( to see how to become a founding member and claim an 80%-plus discount. [Deadline is Tuesday, November 23 at midnight](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [The No. 1 stock to buy EVER?]( One of our analysts admitted, "I almost quit my job to buy this stock." He thinks we could be looking a potential double in weeks... and 1,000% gains over the next few years. This opportunity has crypto-like upside, but with far less risk than buying bitcoin. [Get the details right here, while this presentation is still available](. --------------------------------------------------------------- But it's not just in the melt-up in private markets... It's hard to find anybody, even among the most bullish, who hasn't wondered even privately about the greater fool feel of this stock market. The recent mania surrounding all things electric vehicles ("EVs") is just the latest to have a Ponzi-like feel to it. You just know somebody will be the bag holder... you just hope it's not you. Fear of missing out while everybody else appears to be easily getting rich is a powerful driver into lower-quality investments... especially those driven by a sexy story or seemingly credible narrative. In his Adventures in Capitalism [blog]( Harris Kupperman – who started hedge fund Praetorian Capital – refers to some of these stocks as "The Ponzi Sector." As he explains: To me, these are businesses that sell a dollar for $0.80 and hope to make it up in volume. Just because Amazon (AMZN) ran at a loss early on, doesn't mean that all businesses will inflect at scale. In fact, many of the Ponzi Sector companies seem to have declining economics at scale – largely the result of intense competition with other Ponzi companies who also have negligible costs of capital. One of his current favorite examples is Peloton Interactive (PTON) because, in his view, it hit peak saturation... and burned through a boatload of cash getting there. Or as Kupperman says... They have zero path to profits but continue to incinerate capital to grow profitless revenue and sell a story to Wall Street so that they can continue to raise capital and set it on fire. There are plenty of others, but nothing stands out quite like this year's near-historic bumper crop of initial public offerings ("IPOs"), most of them profitless. They include last week's sizzler, [Sweetgreen (SG)]( a restaurant chain. In a note over the weekend to his subscribers, Renaissance Capital CEO Bill Smith, whose firm specializes in IPOs, referred to Sweetgreen this way: [It's] the latest example that the market will pay almost any price for the right growth story. The fast-growing but unprofitable salad chain opened 86% above the offer price. In the past decade, only one other restaurant has gone public with negative EBITDA [earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization] (China's Luckin Coffee). As a fast-growing coffee shop chain in China, Luckin's 2019 "upsized" IPO was a headline grabber, as was its soaring stock... before an accounting scandal caused it to plunge to less than $2 from a high of $50 in a matter of months. Nobody suggests anything like that at Sweetgreen, but the first-day frenzy over its stock underscores something more important... It's the public's sudden appetite for investing in restaurants, widely regarded as one the riskiest and toughest of all businesses. This year there already have been five restaurant deals, with another three more getting prepped... sparked, no doubt, by the run-up in restaurant stocks starting late last year. While that's still a fraction of the nearly 400 non-special purpose acquisition company ("SPAC") IPOs this year, for perspective, the prior peak was 17 in 1996. And since 2015, when there were four, there have been virtually none. You can't blame the restaurants or any company for taking the money while it's there for the taking. Investors, after all, are tripping over themselves to get in while the getting is good... even if the performance of IPOs hasn't been there. If you knew nothing else, it would be this one stat: Despite all the hoopla and headlines, after years of outperforming the S&P 500 Index, the Renaissance IPO Index of the largest most liquid U.S.-listed newly public companies has been underperforming for the past year. You wouldn't know it by deal activity, which is the busiest for IPOs since 2020... or the value of deals, which is the highest ever. And that's the point: Nobody knows when that window will close, in turn causing a near-panic rush to go public. This gets us back to the EV IPOs, with deals for Rivian Automotive (RIVN) and Lucid (LCID) sparking interest in any EV name that wasn't nailed down. While some initial euphoria has faded, analysts have been pulling out all stops to justify the seemingly crazy valuations. As New York University professor Aswath Damodaran, an authority on valuing companies, told the [New York Times last week]( Let's be quite honest, Wall Street analysts are not valuing Rivian or Lucid. They are chasing the price and finding ways to rationalize it. Right, almost like they're trying to lure in more new investors... you know, like Charles Ponzi. P.S. I'm old enough to know I could have written this same story three years ago and maybe will be writing it again three years from now. For some inexplicable reason, this feels like a good time to do it, too. Moving on... one way around the valuation trap is finding companies with "defensible market positions"... The phrase "defensible market position" is something my colleague Gabe Marshank harps on whenever we talk stocks. As I wrote last week, it's one reason he hates the idea of EV charging stations as an investment... it's a business that invites competition. That's the problem with some of the companies rushing to go public. Regardless of how good their story is, or their food may be – or how much you like their shoes or what they claim their software does – many are either easily knocked off, not scalable, or are likely to find themselves in a race to the bottom in pricing... ultimately resulting in struggling, broken or failed business models... with battered stocks. A recent and great example of a business model that wasn't hot – and one that investors figured out surprisingly early – is Casper Sleep (CSPR), the mattress company. With its popular bed-in-a-box, it seemed like it could be a poster child for the burgeoning direct-to-consumer space. Now it's more like a poster child of a company that should have never gone public. Casper had the misfortune of doing its IPO right before the pandemic collapsed the markets. The stock never quite recovered... and the company is now getting folded into another company at a steep discount to its IPO price. Even before going public, Casper's fate as a public company was so dubious that I wrote a column headlined, "[Is It Better to Stick Money Under a Casper Mattress, or Invest In It?]( The dead giveaway that the "sleep arc" hype being spewed by Casper was little more than a dream was its use of the word joyful in its IPO prospectus... it appeared 19 times. Equally dubious was Casper's claim that it was a pioneer in the sleep economy. (Sound familiar? See my [recent column]( on Allbirds (BIRD).) But the one thing the company itself admitted could be its comeuppance was the boilerplate risk included in its IPO filing... that its industry is highly competitive. Not just the mattress industry but bed-in-a-box competitors were springing up like the way these beds pop out of a box. This is otherwise known as an indefensible market position. And trust me... there are plenty more where Casper came from... As always, feel free to reach out via e-mail by [clicking here](mailto:feedback@empirefinancialresearch.com?subject=Feedback%20for%20Herb). And if you're on Twitter, feel free to follow me there at [@herbgreenberg](. My DMs are open. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Herb Greenberg November 23, 2021 If someone forwarded you this e-mail and you would like to be added to my e-mail list to receive e-mails like this every weekday, simply [sign up here](. © 2021 Empire Financial Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Empire Financial Research, 601 Lexington Ave., 20th Floor, New York, NY 10022 [www.empirefinancialresearch.com.]( You received this e-mail because you are subscribed to Empire Financial Daily. [Unsubscribe from all future e-mails](

Marketing emails from empirefinancialresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2023

Sent On

06/11/2023

Sent On

04/11/2023

Sent On

03/11/2023

Sent On

02/11/2023

Sent On

01/11/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.