Poll: 72% Americans Say President Biden Should Not Run For Re-Election, You Agree?

Vote Now - Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Trump America News 72% Americans Say President Biden Should Not Run For Re-Election, You Agree? [Yes, I Do]( [No, I Do Not]( [Do You Support Pardoning Trump?]( Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Trump The Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have certain immunities from prosecution, which directly impacts Donald Trump’s criminal case regarding his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. This decision delays the proceedings and reduces the likelihood of Trump being tried before the November election.   In a 6-3 decision, the justices sent Trump’s case back to the trial court to reassess the indictment. This ruling prevents barring Trump from the ballot due to his post-2020 election actions, highlighting the Supreme Court's significant role in the upcoming election.   Chief Justice John Roberts stated that former presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for actions within their official capacity and presumptive immunity for all official acts, but not for unofficial acts. The conservative justices supported Roberts, while the three liberal justices dissented.   Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that granting former presidents criminal immunity undermines the constitutional principle that no one is above the law. Trump celebrated the ruling, calling it a victory for the Constitution and democracy. Special counsel Jack Smith's office did not comment.   The ruling came after a slower pace than other high-profile presidential cases, like Watergate. Trump, who denies wrongdoing, claims the prosecutions are politically motivated to prevent his return to the White House. He faces multiple indictments, including a New York felony conviction for falsifying business records.   If Trump’s trial in Washington does not occur before the 2024 election and he does not secure another term, he will likely face trial afterward. However, if he wins, he could appoint an attorney general who might dismiss the federal cases against him or attempt to pardon himself, though this would not apply to his New York state conviction. The Supreme Court’s ruling also involved justices appointed by Trump, and concerns about impartiality were noted due to their personal connections and actions related to January 6. [signature] [Unsubscribe](