Free Newsletter Sample | State of Thursday | RORSCHACH REALITY

Imagine if NASA comms guys and space enthusiasts got together in the minutes after the Challenger shuttle blew up mid-air on live TV and decided they were going to say that the attempt itself to put a school teacher in orbit was what counted. That only a strong nation would attempt such a thing. Hey there! We thought you might like to see a sample of our State of the Day newsletter. If you like what you see, you can signup [here]( to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday. RORSCHACH REALITY Greetings, Fellow Callers, It’s another day in the U.S. of A! Welcome back to State of the Day, where I strip the euphemism and misdirection off national news to give it to you straight, no ice, no mixer. And boy, is there some misdirection in the wake of Harris’s big Fox News interview … RORSCHACH REALITY Imagine if NASA comms guys and space enthusiasts got together in the minutes after the Challenger shuttle blew up mid-air on live TV and decided they were going to say that the attempt itself to put a school teacher in orbit was what counted. That only a strong nation would attempt such a thing. If you were online or watching pro-Harris network media or both, neither of which I recommend, the immediate aftermath of Kamala Harris’s interview with Fox’s Bret Baier was something to behold. As far as the interview itself goes, really the most charitable description you could give would be an Orwellian “ungood.” At worst, it was a disaster unfolding live in homes across the nation. Watch the absolute blank look on Harris’s face after Baier walks her into the most foreseeable trap in the history of interviews ([17 seconds in](. Watch another moment of blankness turn into an attempt to [awkward cackle]( her way out of answering a legitimate question. “C’mon you know, you know what I mean!” She insisted as her ignition giggle failed to turn over into that signature cackle. “I actually don’t,” Baier deadpanned. Houston, we have a problem. Supporters, likely aghast and scrambling for a bright side, settled on a few terms they’d repeat over and over in the hopes of shifting the debate at least by the next morning’s newsletters. “Strong” was one of them. She was “pugilistic.” Worse yet, they claimed the attempt proved it was Kamala, not Trump, who was willing to do contentious interviews. If this sounds like inverted reality, it’s because it is – but it paid off, at least in the minds of Acela corridor elites. By the next morning, Playbook felt bold enough to declare Harris a “Baier hunter.” Points for the pun, but you guys have seriously lost the plot. Of course, there’s a point to all this. It’s an attempt to shift the overton window on analysis of exactly what happened in front of everyone’s eyes Wednesday evening. Playbook’s own write up was almost too on the nose when they declared the interview a political “ink-blot” test, [something I predicted]( several hours earlier. But like reality, there a few undeniable signs the contention is, in a word, bullsh*t. [Like what you're reading? Click here to sign up!]( First, if the interview wasn’t even 15 minutes old [and MSNPC personalities]( were contending that it was both racist and sexist, you might have blown up in the stratosphere. Nobody pulls the race card when they’re winning. Second, where are all the viral clips? Like the 60 Minutes interview before it, very little is going viral online that paints Harris in a positive light. You can find plenty of quotes in heavily-massaged print pieces under utterly tortured headlines, but where are all the clips? Outside of Kamala HQ clipping a series of old talking points she managed to get through the barrage, there’s nothing. If Harris really had a “because you’d be in jail” moment or two, wouldn’t they be going viral on left-wing accounts? The best they seem to have is an “excuse me, a woman is speaking” moment and that’s it. Elon Musk landed a literal skyscraper-sized rocket from outer space on a launch pad and there’s videos of that getting shared everywhere. Lastly, perhaps most importantly, her handlers cut the interview short. She was supposed to do a half hour, but ended up vamoosing after 28 minutes. If you’ve really got a guy pinned to the mat, if you’re “strong,” do you give up? Do strong armies retreat? Does any of this make sense? Meanwhile, [in the immediate wake]( of the interview, a betting market ticked up in Trump’s favor, putting stock in the phrase “money talks and bullsh*t walks.” But will the “everything is fine, this is actually good” routine break through the corridor and into American minds? My guess is not. More than likely it’s just positive self-talk for politicos and media elites. If America tuned in, they likely saw what everyone else saw, Harris burning up in the atmosphere. [Like what you're reading? Click here to sign up!]( WHAT I’M READING: Oops! [MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris]( — Maybe psychologists will get Trump Derangement Syndrome declared an actual mental health malady and these people will end up institutionalized? [Mark Halperin Tells Tucker Carlson Trump Win Would Cause ‘Greatest Mental Health Crisis’ In US History]( — Mary Rooke, ladies and gents. [ROOKE: Feds Quietly Correct Major Election Bomb Harris Doesn’t Want Blowing Up In Her Face](   [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use]( [Feedback]( [Unsubscribe]( [About Us]( 2024 THE DAILY CALLER INC. | 1775 EYE ST, NW STE 1150-290 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.