Newsletter Subject

What’s the future of social media?

From

counterhate.com

Email Address

info@counterhate.com

Sent On

Mon, Sep 23, 2024 01:58 PM

Email Preheader Text

Here’s how governments can combat online harms. Friend, Social media companies only care about

Here’s how governments can combat online harms. [Center for Countering Digital Hate]( Friend, Social media companies only care about their business models. They enable the spread of hate online because it’s profitable. This puts all of us at risk, but especially marginalized communities, vulnerable kids, and our democracies. This doesn’t have to be our reality. Imagine an internet where user safety and well-being are priorities, transparency is non-negotiable, and social media companies are accountable and responsible to users and democratic bodies. Imagine an internet where kids are shielded from online harms, marginalized groups are protected from harassment, and users aren’t bombarded with disinformation. It’s time for policymakers to step up and hold these social media giants accountable. This better and safer internet IS possible. Policymakers must be willing to implement the necessary reforms. CCDH provides this guidance with our [STAR Framework]( which equips policymakers with a blueprint to combat online harms and fortify democracy. [Social media regulation: STAR 2.0 report cover]( What does STAR stand for? - Safety by Design – to prompt companies to design their products with user health and well-being in mind from the start. - Transparency – to ensure companies disclose information about algorithms, product design, platform decisions, and advertising. - Accountability & Responsibility – to force social media companies to be responsive to users and democratic institutions. So, what can you do? Tell your close ones how vital it is to regulate social media giants. It’s time to hold these companies accountable. You can do so by sharing this petition on your social media. [SHARE ON TWITTER/X]( [SHARE ON FACEBOOK]( [SHARE ON LINKEDIN]( [SHARE ON WHATSAPP]( Online harms are rising. If we don’t act now, things will just get worse. Current legislation like Section 230 in the United States is already allowing platforms to avoid accountability and depriving victims of online harms of real justice. As the digital landscape continues to grow and develop, it’s urgent that policymakers implement the STAR framework to counter online harms and achieve a safe internet for all. Best wishes, The CCDH Team [CCDH Facebook]( [CCDH Twitter/X]( [CCDH Youtube]( [CCDH Instagram]( [CCDH TikTok]( [CCDH LinkedIn]( General:info@counterhate.com | Press: press@counterhate.com You are receiving this email as you subscribed to CCDH's email list. [Manage personal data, email subscriptions, and recurring donations]( here or unsubscribe from [all.]( [supporter]

Marketing emails from counterhate.com

View More
Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

28/10/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Sent On

31/08/2024

Sent On

20/08/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.