Newsletter Subject

Can AI deepfakes harm democracy?

From

counterhate.com

Email Address

info@counterhate.com

Sent On

Wed, Jun 12, 2024 02:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

New research finds that AI companies are enabling election disinformation. Friend, Did you see our l

New research finds that AI companies are enabling election disinformation. [Center for Countering Digital Hate]( Friend, Did you see our latest research? AI images and audio clips of politicians uttering controversial statements are spreading online in this big election year - and our latest reports show how easy it is to manipulate AI tools into creating election deepfakes. Here’s what we found: The Attack of the Voice Clones - We tested 6 popular [AI cloning voice tools]( by feeding them 5 false statements and asking them to create audios clips in the voices of 8 US, UK and EU high-profile politicians. The platforms generated convincing election disinformation in 80% of our tests. - These included voice clips of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Rishi Sunak, Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, and Ursula von der Leyen. Check out our findings in [NPR](, [The Hill](, and [AP News](. [Attack of the voice clones image]( Fake Image Factories - We found that [Midjourney]( keeps generating misleading images of US and EU politicians, despite the platform’s policy to stop election disinformation. The AI tool generated convincing deepfakes in 40% of our tests, including images of Biden, Trump, and Macron. Read more in [The Times](, and [France24](. - This report is a follow-up to our [Fake Image Factories]( research, published in March, when we tested Midjourney, ChatGPT Plus, DreamStudio & Microsoft’s Image Creator with text prompts about the 2024 US presidential election. Find out more in [CNN](. --------------------------------------------------------------- AI companies are utterly failing to implement sufficient guardrails to stop users from manipulating their tools to generate election disinformation. Convincing deepfakes are already disrupting elections worldwide, with the serious potential to mislead voters as it gets harder and harder to discern true and false images and audios. Share our findings and raise awareness about AI’s dangerous potential to harm democracy. [SHARE ON TWITTER/X]( [SHARE ON FACEBOOK]( [SHARE ON LINKEDIN]( If you want to learn more about AI, [check out our explainer]( and take a deep dive into AI and how we can make these platforms safer. Best wishes, The CCDH Team [CCDH Facebook]( [CCDH Twitter/X]( [CCDH Youtube]( [CCDH Instagram]( [CCDH TikTok]( [CCDH LinkedIn]( General:info@counterhate.com | Press: press@counterhate.com You are receiving this email as you subscribed to CCDH's email list. [Manage personal data, email subscriptions, and recurring donations]( here or unsubscribe from [all.]( [supporter]

Marketing emails from counterhate.com

View More
Sent On

12/06/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

16/05/2024

Sent On

23/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.