Newsletter Subject

RE: Protect millions more kids from these chemicals

From

consumer.org

Email Address

action@cr.consumer.org

Sent On

Tue, Oct 8, 2024 02:25 PM

Email Preheader Text

to the nation’s largest school lunch suppliers to do the right thing, and remove these chemical

[Consumer Reports]   Friend, help protect kids from harmful chemicals by joining our effortÂto get toxic dyes out of food served at your local schools. California just became the first state to ban these chemicals in school lunches – now we need all kids to get these same protections! [Sign our petition]( to the nation’s largest school lunch suppliers to do the right thing, and remove these chemical dyes from the food they serve all children. It’s an easy thing to do to protect our kids from these health risks!  [Sign the Petition »](  Thanks again for all you do make our food safer for all families. And don't forget to share the petition with friends and family to amp up the pressure on these companies. Meg BohneConsumer Reports _________________________________________________________________ Dear Friend: It’s hard enough these days to choose food free of toxic chemicals for your family. But it’s another thing for giant food corporations to serve these chemicals to our children in public school lunches. Consumer Reports just helped pass a landmark law in California to ban six harmful chemical food dyes in public school food. Now, we need your voice to make sure all kids in the U.S. have these same protections from unnecessary and harmful chemicals. Join us in pressuring the nation’s largest school lunch suppliers – Aramark, Sodexo and Chartwells – [to remove these chemicals from the food they serve to all our children]( Every kid deserves the same shot at a healthier future.  [Sign the Petition »](  California’s new law bans six harmful food dyes – Red Dye No. 40, Yellow Dye No. 5, Yellow Dye No. 6, Blue Dye No. 1, Blue Dye No. 2 and Green Dye No. 3 – from school lunches and snacks in the state. Recent studies found these dyes put some kids at higher risk of hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral issues that interfere with learning. And one, Red Dye 40, has been linked to cancer. Despite these risks, the safety of many of these dyes have not been reevaluated by the FDA since the 1970s and 80s. The reality is, eliminating these dyes would not mean banning any food or drinks in the national lunch program. Instead, it would require the giant food suppliers to substitute natural alternatives to these dyes – which are used primarily to make food more colorful – with things like beet or pomegranate juice. Ensuring school food is free of these chemicals is important for our nation’s children, since kids have lower tolerance levels to chemical exposure than adults, and are especially vulnerable as their bodies are still developing. And with so many U.S. students relying on school meals as their main source of nutrition, it’s critical these chemicals don’t impact their ability to learn. Let’s make sure all students across the nation are served healthier food. [Tell the three largest school lunch providers to commit to not using chemical dyes in school food.](  [Sign the Petition »](  Thank you for taking action. And please share this message with parents and others who will join you in calling for safer school foods. We'll be back in touch about next steps and more ways to get involved! Thank you,Meg BohneConsumer Reports [Unsubscribe from Consumer Reports action alerts.]( © 2022 Consumer Reports, 101 Truman Avenue, Yonkers, NY, 10703 [Contact Consumer Reports](

Marketing emails from consumer.org

View More
Sent On

02/10/2024

Sent On

26/09/2024

Sent On

25/09/2024

Sent On

23/09/2024

Sent On

12/09/2024

Sent On

10/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.