Newsletter Subject

JD Vance on climate change: “weird science”

From

climatepower.us

Email Address

info@climatepower.us

Sent On

Wed, Oct 2, 2024 09:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

Last night we heard two very different plans for protecting our planet and its people Team, last nig

Last night we heard two very different plans for protecting our planet and its people [Climate Power]( Team, last night at the vice presidential debate, JD Vance stood before the American people and declared climate change, and carbon pollution’s scientifically-proven contributions to it, “weird science.” Only a few hundred miles south of the debate stage, thousands are doing the unimaginable work of recovery after one of the deadliest hurricanes in the U.S. And just a few days ago, Vance’s running mate Donald Trump called climate change “one of the greatest scams of all time.” Team, the choice could not be more clear. We can have climate champions, Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, or climate deniers, Donald Trump and JD Vance. And this team is committed to making sure voters appreciate that decision before they cast their ballots. [We are only weeks away from Election Day. Chip in now to support Climate Power and our work to educate the public about climate change and to educate and turn out climate voters this November.]( When Governor Tim Walz was asked that same question about tackling climate change, a priority for 7 out of 10 Americans, his response stood in stark contrast to JD Vance’s. Tim Walz acknowledged that climate change is real. He talked about farmers in Minnesota -- folks who aren’t a bunch of activists or even particularly liberal -- but real people who are struggling to make ends meet when dealing with 500-year droughts and 500-year floods back-to-back. And he talked about the ways the Biden-Harris administration is already addressing that. He cited the Biden-Harris clean energy plan -- the biggest investment in climate, ever -- that has led to a record number of good-paying clean energy jobs (334,000 and counting, in fact). And the path we’re forging toward our clean energy future by taking significant and swift climate action. Here is the choice we have to make. We can spend the next four years continuing to make progress toward our clean energy future with Kamala Harris, or we can roll back all the progress we’ve made under Donald Trump. [So we’re asking for your help, Team: If you’re able, make a donation to support Climate Power to educate people about climate change and mobilize voters to elect climate champions up and down the ballot.]( Thanks for being on this team, Climate Power [DONATE]( Climate Power 815 Black Lives Matter Plaza NW, Suite 4100 Washington, DC 20006 United States [CLIMATEPOWER.US]( | [INFO@CLIMATEPOWER.US](mailto:info@climatepower.us?refcode=email_fund_VPDebate_20241002_180d&source=email_fund_VPDebate_20241002_180d) Sent via [ActionNetwork.org](. To update your email address, change your name or address, or to stop receiving emails from Climate Power, please [click here](.

Marketing emails from climatepower.us

View More
Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Sent On

30/09/2024

Sent On

29/09/2024

Sent On

28/09/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.