Soros DA Goes After Musk To Stop His Giveaway

[Logo]( [Soros DA Goes After Musk To Stop His Giveaway] [Soros DA Goes After Musk To Stop His Giveaway]( They are trying to stop him from helping Trump Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner's recent lawsuit against Elon Musk's America PAC initiative has kicked off a fierce debate, spotlighting the intersection of technology, election law, and campaign influence. At the center of this dispute is Musk's $1 million-a-day giveaway program, which offers a substantial prize to individuals who sign a petition supporting First and Second Amendment rights through America PAC. The initiative targets registered voters in critical swing states, fueling Krasner's concerns about what he calls an "unlawful lottery." [Krasner argues]( that the giveaway not only poses a "deceptive" incentive but skirts Pennsylvania's lottery laws, which strictly regulate financial inducements linked to voting or pledging support. He's far from the only one taking issue. The Biden-Harris Department of Justice has also entered the fray, issuing a stern warning to Musk that these giveaways "might violate federal laws against paying voters." Citing federal restrictions on monetary inducements to voting or voter registration, the administration has hinted at the possibility of criminal action if Musk doesn't back down. The DOJ's letter followed a request from a group of anti-Trump Republicans, who urged federal intervention, adding another dimension to this escalating legal showdown. This legal challenge arrives against a backdrop of increasingly polarized opinions over election integrity laws. The Biden administration has repeatedly positioned itself against Republican-led election legislation, asserting that these laws suppress voter turnout. Adding fuel to this tension, Biden recently filed a lawsuit aiming to prevent Virginia from removing non-citizens from voter rolls, arguing that the effort disproportionately affects communities of color and voters' access. Legal experts say this case is in "new legal territory." Nate Persily, a Stanford Law professor, noted that if the giveaway effectively induces voter registration, it may indeed run afoul of federal law. However, if it's solely tied to signing a petition, the giveaway could fall outside legal restrictions. Analysts see the incentive as a tactic to galvanize support, with Michael Morse from the University of Pennsylvania characterizing it as a strategy to build a comprehensive voter contact list, especially for potential campaigning in a razor-thin election. [Kamala Factory Visit Goes Upside Down - Straight Out of Veep] [Kamala Factory Visit Goes Upside Down - Straight Out of Veep]( Told: 'Do not touch it.' [All Heck Breaks Loose At Major US Paper After Kamala Decision] [All Heck Breaks Loose At Major US Paper After Kamala Decision]( Wow! Didn't see this coming. [Trump Drops A New Tax Credit, No Wonder The Left Is Fuming] [Trump Drops A New Tax Credit, No Wonder The Left Is Fuming]( Dems jaws drop. [Dr. Phil Has Special Message for Trump Supporters] [Dr. Phil Has Special Message for Trump Supporters]( Holy smokes. [Scarborough Panic: Demands Harris Do A 180 On Policy] [Scarborough Panic: Demands Harris Do A 180 On Policy]( The guy had a panic attack. You are receiving this email because you opted in to Civil Deadline daily newsletter. Copyright 2024. Civil Deadline. All rights reserved. 30 N. Gould St, Suite 6911, Sheridan, WY 82801 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](