Newsletter Subject

Pelosi Gives Shocking Denial About Kamala & Primary

From

civildeadline.com

Email Address

mail@civildeadline.com

Sent On

Mon, Sep 23, 2024 02:39 PM

Email Preheader Text

She's gotta be drunk. In the whirlwind of political processes, few things have sparked as much debat

[Logo]( [Pelosi Gives Shocking Denial About Kamala & Primary] [Pelosi Gives Shocking Denial About Kamala & Primary]( She's gotta be drunk. In the whirlwind of political processes, few things have sparked as much debate as Vice President Kamala Harris's swift rise to the Democratic nomination in the wake of President Joe Biden's exit from the race. What was initially framed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as an "open primary" has now become a point of contention, with critics from across the political spectrum questioning the legitimacy of Harris's path to the nomination. Pelosi's assertion that Harris won the nomination in a fair, open contest is facing heavy scrutiny, with many calling the process a mere formality rather than a true primary. Leading up to Biden's decision to step down in July 2024, there was much discussion about what the Democratic Party would do if the sitting president were to withdraw from the race. Pelosi herself was on record favoring a competitive primary should the need arise. However, when Biden endorsed Harris as his successor the same day he announced his exit, the landscape shifted dramatically. What followed was a [fast-tracked process]( that included a virtual roll call vote at the Democratic National Convention. Despite some potential challengers to Harris, none were able to officially qualify for the ballot due to the high threshold of delegate signatures required. "We had an open primary and [Kamala Harris] won it. Nobody else got in the race," [@SpeakerPelosi]( tells [@kadiagoba](. [pic.twitter.com/y2O0JhKBgc]( - Semafor (@semafor) [September 18, 2024]( As the sole candidate in the roll call, Harris secured an overwhelming 99% of the delegate vote. Pelosi, in defending this process, argued that while the primary was open to others, Harris's momentum and support from Biden effectively shut out other candidates before they even had the chance to formally run. Her remarks emphasized that Harris's early backing and strategic positioning "saved time" and allowed the party to rally quickly around her candidacy in the short window leading up to the general election. But for conservatives and skeptics, this "open primary" narrative rings hollow. Heritage Action for America's Ryan Walker criticized the process, calling it a farce and claiming that millions of voters who initially cast ballots for Biden were essentially disregarded. Others, like Jenny Beth Martin from the Tea Party Patriots, echoed similar sentiments, accusing Pelosi of misleading the public and trying to paint a pre-determined outcome as a legitimate contest. Political analysts, however, argue that while the process may not have followed contemporary expectations, it wasn't illegal or even unprecedented. Experts like Jeremy Mayer from George Mason University and Leonard Steinhorn from American University note that political parties ultimately have wide discretion in choosing their nominees. The system Harris ascended through mirrors an older style of convention-based selections, not dissimilar to how candidates were chosen prior to the adoption of widespread primaries. Mayer highlighted that, historically, figures like Gerald Ford were appointed without facing direct primaries, underscoring that party conventions have long played this role in American politics. Ultimately, the criticism around Harris's nomination is less about legality and more about perception. For some, it feels like a deviation from the democratic norms we've come to expect in modern elections, where voters anticipate an active primary with multiple candidates vying for the top spot. Instead, the Democratic Party quickly coalesced around Harris, leaving many to wonder whether anyone else had a real chance to challenge her. Yet, as Steinhorn aptly pointed out, with less than four months until the general election, the party had little room for error. The stakes were high, and Harris, armed with Biden's endorsement, had a clear path to solidify her position. Given the circumstances, the party acted decisively, and by the time Harris secured her nomination, any meaningful opposition had already been sidelined. [Another Dem Candidate Caught In Stolen Valor Scandal] [Another Dem Candidate Caught In Stolen Valor Scandal]( Why are Democrats always the ones lying about this. [Leftists Kamala Supporting Billionaire Wishes To Make A Play For Twitter] [Leftists Kamala Supporting Billionaire Wishes To Make A Play For Twitter]( They want control and censorship so bad. [New Trump Anthem Hits Top 10!] [New Trump Anthem Hits Top 10!]( Incredible response. [Top Hip Hop Producers Blasts Celebs Over Political Endorsements] [Top Hip Hop Producers Blasts Celebs Over Political Endorsements]( Looks like boycotts work. [Top Globalist Resigns in Disgrace After Trump Interview Scandal] [Top Globalist Resigns in Disgrace After Trump Interview Scandal]( Tried to make interview illegal. You are receiving this email because you opted in to Civil Deadline daily newsletter. Copyright 2024. Civil Deadline. All rights reserved. 30 N. Gould St, Suite 6911, Sheridan, WY 82801 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from civildeadline.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.