Newsletter Subject

nuclear annihilation by computer

From

citizen.org

Email Address

robert@citizen.org

Sent On

Thu, Jul 20, 2023 07:42 PM

Email Preheader Text

Only 6,376 people have signed the petition so far. We HAVE TO get that number up. Look, I know that

Only 6,376 people have signed the petition so far. We HAVE TO get that number up. Look, I know that the worry about artificial intelligence can sound overblown. - But think about all the devices in our lives that have computer chips in them — phones, TVs, coffee makers and washing machines, cars, the actual computers we use at home and at work, and so much more everyday technology. - At some point in your life, has a computerized device frozen up or malfunctioned? - And think how criminals and hackers routinely exploit computer systems to attack or extort individuals, businesses, and governments. - And think about how irresponsible Big Tech has always been — and still is — about privacy and security. Now imagine if artificial intelligence systems — the most powerful computer technology yet, which Big Tech is rushing into existence even though it doesn’t really understand how it works — were given final say in launching nuclear missiles. That is insane. Read my earlier note for more. [And add your name now to urge the Senate not to let the military give AI final say in whether human civilization ends in nuclear holocaust.]( Thank you, - Robert ****** It is supposed to be science fiction (as in classic ’80s films like WarGames and The Terminator): An artificial intelligence system initiates a global nuclear war and wipes out human civilization as we know it. But that precise scenario is now too close for comfort. That’s why Sen. Edward J. Markey (Massachusetts) has introduced an amendment to the annual legislation — in the Senate right now — that sets the Pentagon’s budget. This critical proposal would prohibit our armed forces from giving artificial intelligence the final say in whether to launch nuclear weapons. Currently — as has also been depicted in many movies — each of our nation’s nuclear missile silos and submarines requires two human beings to verify a launch order and to turn the keys that actually set missiles into motion. It may seem crazy to have to say this, but we must not leave it up to some artificial intelligence system to decide if human civilization ends in nuclear holocaust. [Tell the Senate:]( [This is real life, not science fiction. You must adopt Sen. Markey’s amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act and prohibit — by law — artificial intelligence from having the final say in launching nuclear missiles.]( [Click now to add your name.]( Thanks for taking action. For progress, - Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen Public Citizen | 1600 20th Street NW | Washington DC 20009 | [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from citizen.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Sent On

19/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.