Newsletter Subject

The Review: Expertise, Pedantry, and the Woes of the Fact-Checker

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Mon, Jul 26, 2021 11:02 AM

Email Preheader Text

Accuracy, or propaganda? ADVERTISEMENT free to receive your own copy. . In the middle of the Trump p

Accuracy, or propaganda? ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( [logo] Did someone forward you this newsletter? [Sign up]( free to receive your own copy. [Read this newsletter on the web](. In the middle of the Trump presidency, [Sam Fallon wrote a widely]( criticizing professors of literature and history for what he called “literalist interventions” — attacks on presidential policy and rhetoric that hinged on a kind of irrelevant pedantry, an exhausting and pointless unfurling of “dull litanies of fact.” The constraints and contortions of the media to which public-facing scholars have recourse might be part of the problem, as Fallon acknowledged: “Twitter’s enforced brevity privileges the factoid,” for instance, and outlets like Vox have “built a brand around a house style that blends earnest righteousness and complacent, self-satisfied wonkery.” What Fallon called “fact-grubbing” became, in the Trump years, a metastasizing genre all its own, a genre whose finale, or tombstone, was the Washington Post “Fact Checker” [article]( headlined “Trump’s False or Misleading Claims Total 30,573 Over 4 Years.” Trump’s compulsive mendacity might have seemed to justify that quantitative approach, though one wonders how Obama, or Bush, or any world leader anywhere, would have fared in a comparable exercise. Paid for and Created by University of Denver [University of Denver Research Addresses Global Challenges]( Learn how University of Denver faculty and students are collaborating with other institutions, community organizations and state agencies to drive positive innovation, leveraging its diverse portfolio of knowledge leaders to create global solutions. Articles like the Post’s were rhetoric, not fact-checking; their purpose was to persuade, not to explain, and at their worst they shaded into propaganda. Trump is out of office now, but, unfortunately, the genre of the motivated fact-check is still around, one more irritating revenant from the Trump years. I was reminded of it recently when a friend, anxious about the Delta variant, texted me in alarm about a CNN “fact check” of President Biden’s statement that “if you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU unit, and you’re not going to die.” “[This is false]( CNN insisted (in decisive red highlighter), I guess because it is not literally impossible to die if you’re vaccinated, merely extremely unlikely. As of this writing, around 99.5 per cent of Covid-19 deaths are [among unvaccinated people](. Accusing Biden of a falsehood is absurd. The point seems to be to justify showy Trump-era fact-checking with a display of even-handedness. But the result merely confirms that pedantic fact-checks were never good journalism. [Read Fallon’s 201](. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( Subscribe to The Chronicle The Chronicle’s award-winning journalism challenges conventional wisdom, holds academic leaders accountable, and empowers you to do your job better — and it’s your support that makes our work possible. [Subscribe Today]( The Latest THE REVIEW [The Pernicious Fantasy of the Nikole Hannah-Jones Saga]( By Jason England [image] Her success is not a collective victory for Black academics. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( THE REVIEW [Classic Books or Diverse Books?]( By Roosevelt Montás [image] That’s a false binary. ADVICE [How to Finish Disparate Tasks Without Cloning Yourself]( By Rebecca Schuman [image] An academic-writing specialist offers two ways to manage work on multiple projects. ADVICE [6 Types of Book Proposals That Don’t Get Contracts]( By Laura Portwood-Stacer [image] How to avoid pitfalls and write a pitch that will inspire a “yes” from a scholarly publisher. Recommended: - At her newsletter, [Anne Helen Petersen is withering]( on predatory M.A. programs. Her exemplum is the University of Chicago’s Master of Arts Program in the Humanities (annual tuition = $62,640), admission to which is often offered to rejected applicants from funded Ph.D. programs. - “Ordinary people were acting out ultimate things amid gnats, birds, trees — and doing so despite a wider culture that had mostly abandoned outdoor theater and, increasingly, ultimate things.” [At]( Point]( Andrew Kay on Mormonism]( religious theater, sci-fi, and death. (And then check out Kay’s 2019 [Review]( about the MLA, “Academe’s Extinction Event.”]( - “Under Arendt’s analysis, the terms of the post-2016 conversation about truth and lies grow slippery. If politicians have always lied, and the American government has a well-established habit of attempting to deceive its citizens, what is new about ‘post-truth’? Trump’s hatred for reporters was hardly novel.” At Harper’s, [Rebecca Panovka on what the current vogue]( for Hannah Arendt gets wrong. (And on related questions: See my [Review]( with Samuel Moyn]( from January.) Write to me at opinion@chronicle.com or len.gutkin@chronicle.com. Yours, Len Gutkin Paid for and Created by Dipont Education [The Making of a Global Educator]( Since joining Dipont Education and shaping the curriculum at Kunshan American School in China, Carol Santos says her view of what global education entails continues to evolve as she learns more about her students and their needs. Today's Global Campus Strategies for Reviving International Enrollments and Study Abroad Pandemic travel restrictions cut both ways, causing international enrollments to plummet and limiting study-abroad opportunities. This Chronicle report provides an in-depth look at how the global education experience has changed and offers strategies for assessing and adapting programs to ensure students' exposure to cultural and global diversity. [Order your copy today.]( Job Opportunities [Search the Chronicle's jobs database]( to view the latest jobs in higher education. What did you think of today’s newsletter? [Strongly disliked]( // [It was OK]( // [Loved it](. [logo]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2021 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.