Newsletter Subject

Latitudes: For international postdocs, the U.S. research experience might not measure up

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Wed, Aug 28, 2024 03:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Foreign scholars often earn less and have fewer opportunities than Americans. ADVERTISEMENT You can

Foreign scholars often earn less and have fewer opportunities than Americans. ADVERTISEMENT [Latitudes Logo]( You can also [read this newsletter on the web](. Or, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, [unsubscribe](. New study looks at the experience of foreign postdocs and finds it lacking International postdoctoral scholars often earn less than their American counterparts and report having fewer opportunities to teach or be a co-investigator on research grants, especially if they earned their Ph.D.s. abroad. A [new paper]( by Shulamit Kahn and Megan MacGarvie, both associate professors of markets, public policy, and law at Boston University, suggests that foreign postdocs have a different experience than do American scholars — one that can be subpar. The findings are significant because more than half of all postdoctoral scholars are temporary residents, and of those, 70 percent received their doctorates outside the United States. Some 85 percent of American scientific papers are estimated to have at least one postdoc as part of the authorship team. At the same time, academic-laboratory directors in both the United States and Europe have reported a shortage of postdocs, as more young scientists go directly into the private sector after earning their degrees. The number of international scholars coming for fellowships at American colleges has also not fully recovered after dropping precipitously during the pandemic. Despite their critical role in science and academe, research on this group has been limited, Kahn and MacGarvie write. They mined the Early Career Doctoral Survey, conducted by the National Science Foundation, to try to paint a fuller and comparative picture. Foreign-educated postdocs, they found, earn less than international scholars who studied in the United States — who make less than do American citizens and permanent residents. American postdoctoral fellows are paid about 7 percent more than their overseas-trained counterparts and 5 percent more than those who received their schooling in this country. This disparity exists despite the fact that temporary residents are more likely to work in higher-paid fields, such as engineering and computer science. What’s more, postdocs with foreign degrees have higher research productivity: They produce 19 percent more published articles, make 17 percent more submissions, and have 34 percent more published proceedings than American citizens. MacGarvie and Kahn also examined several other aspects of the postdoctoral experience, including grant and teaching involvement, mentoring and career guidance, publication support, and collaboration with researchers outside their department or lab. On only one dimension, appropriate recognition for their work, did American and non-American scholars not report significantly different experiences. In general, the negative gaps were wider for those educated abroad. While the researchers do not claim to estimate causal effects, one reason for the differences in salary and experience may be that international postdocs have less bargaining power than those educated in the United States. Degree holders from American institutions, including those on student visas, often have more extensive and established networks in this country, which can result in better matches in lab placements and more fellowship offers. At the same time, international postdocs may have more to gain: Knowledge of the American research system has value, and connections with American scientists can increase scholars’ chances of getting a permanent job in the United States as well as expand opportunities for overseas collaboration if they return home. Noncitizens are also less likely to have their own research funding, mainly because of restrictions on U.S.-government grants. A third of the American postdocs MacGarvie and Kahn studied were either on federally funded fellowships or had other sources of federal funds awarded directly to them, rather than to their supervisor or institution. Less than 8 percent of American-educated temporary visa holders, and less than 14 percent of those who got their degrees abroad, have their own funding. There can be a disadvantage to not speaking English as a first language, despite the fact that many scientists in the United States are not native English speakers, the authors write. And a recent National Institutes of Health committee studying the postdoctoral experience noted that visa rules and immigration concerns can “compound” the challenges of foreign scholars. Supervisors could be hesitant to invest in temporary visa holders, but Kahn and MacGarvie discovered that better pay and more positive experiences can make postdocs who planned to leave the United States more likely to stay here. Their findings suggest that colleges and federal science agencies could do more to attract, retain, and improve the experiences of foreign postdocs, such as expanding mentoring and helping them find placements that better match their abilities and interest. ADVERTISEMENT Upcoming Workshop [The Chronicle's Early-Career Faculty Bootcamp | September 2024] Join us in September for a half-day virtual workshop that will offer early-career faculty the opportunity to build their skills, understand institutional and role-specific contexts, and gain access to the insights that experienced faculty wished they had known. [Learn more and register!]( Share your perspective I’d like to hear more from current or former international postdoctoral fellows: Do the researchers’ findings resonate with you? Did you discover different challenges or different opportunities? What are your suggestions for improving this early-career academic experience? Write to me at karin.fischer@chronicle.com, and I could include your reflections in an upcoming newsletter. FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [Overcoming Student Loneliness - The Chronicle Store]( [Overcoming Student Loneliness]( Students are especially vulnerable to loneliness, which can be difficult to measure and hard to combat. [Order this report]( for expert insights to foster stronger social connections on your campus. And finally … Latitudes will be back from break next week with fresh reporting and analysis. If there’s news I missed while on vacation, drop me a line at karin.fischer@chronicle.com. I always welcome your feedback and ideas for future reporting, In the meantime, thanks for reading. You can connect with me on [X]( or [LinkedIn](. If you like this newsletter, please share it with colleagues and friends. They can [sign up here](. ADVERTISEMENT CAREER RESOURCES [Finding a New Job] [Read the August collection]( for advice on finding a new job. Learn how you can start preparing for the fall job search now, how to find jobs overseas, and more. JOB OPPORTUNITIES [Search jobs on The Chronicle job board]( [Find Your Next Role Today]( Whether you are actively or passively searching for your next career opportunity, The Chronicle is here to support you throughout your job search. Get started now by [exploring 30,000+ openings]( or [signing up for job alerts](. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. [The Chronicle of Higher Education Logo]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2024 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.