Newsletter Subject

The Edge: Two research universities forge a unique $11.5-million online-ed collaboration

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Wed, Jun 5, 2024 11:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

Shunning models tried by others, UT-Knoxville reached out to Arizona State U. to help it expand its

Shunning models tried by others, UT-Knoxville reached out to Arizona State U. to help it expand its digital offerings and tap new pools of students. ADVERTISEMENT [The Edge Logo]( You can also [read this newsletter on the web](. Or, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, [unsubscribe](. I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed. This week I report on an unusual new online-education partnership involving two research universities. Plus, a few updates. Also a programming note: The Chronicle will not be publishing on June 19 in honor of the Juneteenth holiday. So look for the next issue of The Edge, in your inbox and online, on June 20. ADVERTISEMENT SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to essential news, analysis, and advice. Two research universities forge an $11.5-million online-ed collaboration When the University of Tennessee at Knoxville began getting serious a few years ago about building out its online-education offerings, officials there first took a hard look around at several models they might follow to jump-start their efforts. To be sure, there’s no shortage of those. In just the past five years we’ve seen private institutions like Simmons University [betting big with online-program-management companies]( public universities like the University of Arizona [buying for-profit universities]( with big online footprints, a public university (the University of Massachusetts) [acquiring a mostly-online nonprofit institution]( and even a public system (the University of North Carolina) [creating its own OPM](. But smashing successes, most of those have not been. In fact, some have [become rather problematic]( and [frustrating](. It didn’t take the Tennessee folks very long to determine they’d be better off with a new approach. “There were enough cautionary tales out there,” John Zomchick, the provost, told me. So instead of buying an existing online-ed venture whose culture and values would be out of sync with the university’s, or agreeing to give away a big share of tuition revenue to an OPM, the Knoxville campus decided to create a partnership with another public research institution — one that already has a major presence in the online-ed world: Arizona State University. ASU enrolls 95,000 students in exclusively online programs, and boasts 4,500 online courses and nearly 400 degree and certificate programs. Its on-campus students also can take some of their courses online. Enrollment in UT-Knoxville’s [Vols Online]( program is much smaller — about 2,500 students over all, mostly in master’s programs. Online education “wasn’t a focus,” Zomchick told me. If you know anything about ASU, you know [“scaling” is one of its mantras](. No surprise, then, that the collaboration’s prime goal, according to the contract shared with me this week, is to bring 30,000 new students to UT-Knoxville by 2029 — half in degree programs and half in noncredit and certificate offerings. It’s hard to judge whether the deal — which involves payment of $11.5 million to ASU over five years — will turn out to be a worthwhile financial gamble for UT-Knoxville. But at the very least it does strike me as a smart match for several reasons, which I highlight below. But first, some of the nuts and bolts of this unique model: The most visible piece of the collaboration is the course exchange, which will begin this August with ASU providing up to 10 of its general-education courses to UT-Knoxville students. Over time, ASU will make more courses available, and UT-Knoxville will offer some of its courses to ASU as well. Students will remain at their home institutions and pay their respective tuition prices. The institutions will remunerate each other by paying a flat, per-credit fee for each student who enrolls in the other’s course (initially, $242 per credit for undergrad courses and $425 for master’s). So as with the OPM model, there is a revenue share, but it’s not based on a percentage of the tuition. The two institutions also expect to develop at least one shared degree program. The collaboration differs from the OPM model in other ways, too. ASU is not developing online versions of UT-Knoxville courses or assuming responsibility for marketing the programs or recruiting students to them, as companies like Academic Partnerships or 2U typically do. Instead, people in ASU’s online operation, known as EdPlus, will work side-by-side with UT-Knoxville personnel to help the Vols Online operation develop that expertise for itself. The idea is to “rapidly accelerate” Knoxville’s digital knowledge, said Phil Regier, chief executive at EdPlus. ASU will advise and assist Vols Online on all aspects of online-ed offerings, but as UT-Knoxville’s Zomchick told me, the goal is to “build up our capacities here.” UT-Knoxville will pay $3.5 million for those operational advisory services. It will pay an additional $8 million for access to innovative teaching technologies ASU has helped to create, such as its virtual-reality [Dreamscape Learn]( project, and the asynchronous early-college [Study Hall]( courses it developed in collaboration with Crash Course. As part of the collaboration, the two institutions have also agreed to exchange insights, feedback, and lessons from the relationship in a “shared knowledge core,” which is meant to benefit both parties. This collaboration intrigues me for several reasons. First, because it involves two major research universities, it could bring more legitimacy to online education. That’s especially important for ASU, which is still sometimes knocked by its academic peers (or, at least, by faculty members at institutions it considers its peers) for its high profile in online ed. “We don’t want to be a unicorn in this space,” Regier told me. “There should be other universities that help us achieve a higher degree of adult completion.” The collaboration also makes sense from a business standpoint. While ASU has been aggressively courting students beyond Arizona — especially in California — there’s not a lot of overlap between the two institutions’ markets. The ASU brand “is stronger west of the Mississippi,” said Regier, adding that there’s now no pre-eminent online university in the Southeast (though that’s not for lack of trying by the University of Florida). And Zomchick said he’s optimistic that with the right underpinnings, Vols Online can attract students, especially some of the 900,000 Tennesseans with some college under their belt but no degree. The Tennessee name “means a lot to people in our region,” he said. Still, as Regier insisted, “market domination” isn’t the goal; it’s about getting more universities using online education to reach new students. I also think it’s cool to see two major research universities from opposite sides of the country sharing expertise in this manner. I wonder why more don’t. It will be fascinating to watch, as both an academic collaboration and a business partnership. A deal like this is a first for ASU. University leaders from around the country visit EdPlus all the time, Regier told me, but typically “they go back and nothing happens.” But this collaboration came together pretty quickly. Donde Plowman, the UT-Knoxville chancellor, brought colleagues to ASU in March 2022, and within a year, officials at both institutions were already working together — even before any money had changed hands. Zomchick said he’s convinced that faculty members at UT-Knoxville were more willing to get behind this new push for online ed because they have an academic institution as a partner, not an OPM. Vols Online will continue to employ its OPM company, Noodle, for some services, but Zomchick said he’s confident the arrangement with ASU will help it quickly gain self-sufficiency. “We’ve got the talent, and the opportunity now, to build it in-house.” I also wondered how ASU was viewing the arrangement. Will this be a new line of “business” for ASU? Apparently, that will depend. There’s nothing in the deal that prohibits it from working with other universities. But for now, Regier said, the attention is on “really getting this one right first.” An advocate for men and boys lands a grant for women’s empowerment Melinda French Gates is going her own way in grantmaking, and among those receiving a share of the first [$1 billion in grants to promote women’s health and empowerment]( from her new Pivotal Philanthropies Foundation is the author and scholar Richard V. Reeves. That’s interesting to me because, [as I shared with you in March]( Reeves’s focus has been primarily on how education is leaving men behind, particularly in areas he’s dubbed the HEAL fields. Reeves was among an eclectic group of 12 global leaders granted $20 million each to distribute to charities doing urgent and innovative work to improve women’s health and well-being in the United States and around the world. If “gender gaps matter, they matter in both directions,” Reeves said [in a thread on X]( after the gift was announced last week. “Broadening the gender-equality movement to include men will not hinder the progress of women. Failing to, just might.” Yup, faculty members and administrators see higher ed differently During a recent virtual forum I hosted, we talked about a new survey that compared opinions of faculty members and administrators. Two of the findings from that survey stood out to me: For the question “How optimistic are you about the future of your institution?” 56 percent of administrators said extremely or very optimistic; but just 23 percent of faculty members gave that same response. And for the question “How would you characterize the state of shared governance at your institution?” 58 percent of faculty members said not at all strong or slightly strong, while only 29 percent of administrators responded that way. You can obtain the full report on what faculty members and administrators want from one another via [this link](. If you missed the conversation live and want to watch it at your leisure, you can find it [here](. Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, [find them here](. To receive your own copy, free, register [here](. If you want to follow me on X, [@GoldieStandard]( is my handle. Or find me on BlueSky Social, which I just joined with [the same handle](. UPCOMING PROGRAM [The Chronicle's Strategic-Leadership Program for Department Chairs | June 2024] [Join us in June]( for a professional development program tailored to the needs of department chairs. Experienced academic leaders will provide insights on the current trends in higher ed, effective ways to manage a department, strategic planning, and more. [Register today!]( Goldie's Picks A SEA CHANGE [Colleges Have Agreed to Pay Athletes. What’s Next?]( By Nell Gluckman [STORY IMAGE]( The agreement, by the NCAA and the nation’s most high-powered athletic conferences, is part of a historic settlement that still faces review by a judge. MAKING THE CASE [Iowa Businesses Are Making Their Pitch to High-School Graduates. Colleges Struggle to Compete.]( By Eric Kelderman [STORY IMAGE]( Enrollments are falling as more grads go straight into the work force. How can colleges change their minds? THE REVIEW | ESSAY [Can Small, Struggling Colleges Survive?]( By Robert Kelchen [STORY IMAGE]( There are paths forward, but they all require acting early. CAREER RESOURCES [Read the June collection]( for advice on finding a job as a new PhD grad. Learn how you can manage job market expectations, dually apply for industry and academic roles, and more! ADVERTISEMENT FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [Fostering Students' Free Expression - Buy Now]( [Higher Education in 2035]( Higher education is facing an array of challenges: economic headwinds, political pressures, and shifting demographics. [Order your copy]( to help your institution prepare for what’s ahead, and discover how the sector will evolve in the coming decade. JOB OPPORTUNITIES [Search jobs on The Chronicle job board]( [Find Your Next Role Today]( Whether you are actively or passively searching for your next career opportunity, The Chronicle is here to support you throughout your job search. Get started now by [exploring 30,000+ openings]( or [signing up for job alerts](. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2024 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

EDM Keywords (227)

would world working wonder women within willing well week web ways way watch want viewing view urgent university universities unicorn typically turn tuition trying today tip throughout thread thought tennessee talked talent take sync surprise sure support student strong strike state signing side shortage shared share services sent sector response report remunerate remain relationship region receiving receive read question publishing prohibits progress programs primarily pitch picks percentage people peers paying pay partnership partner parties part overlap optimistic opportunity opm online one offer obtain nuts nothing noncredit next newsletter needs ncaa nation mostly money missed minds men meant matter master marketing mantras manner manage making make lot look long link like lessons leisure legitimacy least lack know june joined job interesting institutions instead industry inbox idea house hosted honor hinder highlight helped help health hard handle half grants grantmaking grant got going goal gift getting future frustrating forwarded follow focus florida first findings finding find fascinating falling fact facing expertise expand evolve even enrolls empowerment employ email efforts education edplus edge dubbed distribute discover developed develop determine depend degree deal create courses copy cool convinced continue considers confident compete college collaboration chronicle charities characterize capacities california buying business building build bolts better benefit belt begin based author august attention asu aspects array arrangement around areas among already ahead agreement agreeing agreed advocate advise advice advertisement actively access 425 10

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

11/10/2024

Sent On

10/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

05/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.