Newsletter Subject

The Edge: Colleges bootstrap their way to AI literacy

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Wed, May 22, 2024 11:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

With strategies like hands-on experiments, librarian-led demos, and templates for model-policy langu

With strategies like hands-on experiments, librarian-led demos, and templates for model-policy language, colleges are preparing for a new era in tech. ADVERTISEMENT [The Edge Logo]( You can also [read this newsletter on the web](. Or, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, [unsubscribe](. I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed. This week I highlight various ways colleges are preparing to teach and operate in a world suffused with artificial-intelligence tools. ADVERTISEMENT SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to essential news, analysis, and advice. Here’s how five colleges are building their AI expertise It doesn’t take a big budget or a deep bench of computer-science researchers for organizations to begin equipping themselves to understand the potential impact of powerful new artificial-intelligence tools. That was the clearest takeaway — and in many ways, the most comforting one — from the many responses to [my question last month]( on how organizations are preparing for an AI-powered future. I appreciate the detailed responses so many of you sent my way. Notably, many of the interesting ideas I received came from institutions that aren’t giant, and the people heading up the efforts aren’t necessarily techies, but rather folks like librarians and professors of writing. I’m impressed by the initiative so many people are taking in developing resources for their colleagues and I’ll note that many of these resources are available for sharing. I also want to highlight the anxiety over AI many of you shared — concerns about its use in cheating and in diminishing the value of teaching writing — that I saw in many of the comments. Clearly that concern runs deep and deserves continued attention. Following are highlights from five colleges: Metropolitan State University of Denver runs monthly workshops on [AI Empowerment in Higher Education]( led by Samuel M. Jay, a professor of communications studies and director of faculty affairs. It is also building an [AI for All]( site that is rich with readings, how-to videos, and policy guidance to help professors and staff members. Jay said he plans to spend the summer developing additional videos explaining the best approaches to “prompt engineering” — that’s the skill of crafting the questions so AI tools return the most useful responses. He’ll also be working with the English department on policies for the best use of Chat-GPT and other generative AI tools. Last year MSU Denver created a generative AI taskforce that advises the provost, deans, and others in academic affairs on matters, like whether to deploy AI detectors. Having faculty members well-represented on committees like this, Jay wrote, is “a great way to lower the anxiety level (just a bit).” Randolph College, in Virginia, has been engaging on AI issues through one of its committees, the Writing Board, which has been soliciting its faculty members for opinions on and strategies for generative AI. This is more than informational, said one member, Jennifer Gauthier, a professor of media and culture. The board is hoping to use the information to propose changes to the [Honor Code]( which is entirely managed by students. Also, she said, most professors now realize they need statements on AI use in all their syllabi, and probably for each assignment, too: “It has become clear that AI might be useful and could be allowed as a resource in some circumstances.” (As an instructor teaching students to analyze media messages, however, Gauthier is still wary. The speed at which the tools provide answers, she said, is “truly terrifying to me.”) Hudson County Community College, in New Jersey, created a GenAI Professional Learning Community as a vehicle for faculty and staff members to explore AI hands-on. Over the past year the community has organized a series of individual and group exercises using the tools to develop lesson plans, prepare meeting agendas, write grant proposals, and the like. The idea is for college personnel to get “a feel for how these tools can be used ethically to increase creativity and productivity,” wrote Matthew LaBrake, executive director of the college’s Center for Online Learning. The hands-on exercises are key. “Experimentation with gen AI,” LaBrake said, “is really a prerequisite to understanding them and their potential impact on both education and industry.” Marshall University brought together professors, administrators, and technologists for a Presidential Task Force on AI, and that has in turn developed [templates for language faculty members might use on their syllabi]( some [practical guidance for teaching with AI](. (The first lesson in that latter document: “AI is here to stay.”) The West Virginia university is also experimenting on the business side. It’s working with AI tools from Microsoft and Amazon Web Services to explore if the technology can be used to increase efficiency. Some examples, per Jodie Penrod, the university’s chief information officer: Can they spot abnormal end-of-the-year spending or simplify the query systems used for budgeting ? Even more exciting — to me, at least: Marshall is also evaluating ways that AI might be able to scan the content of courses offered by other universities, to pave the way for smoother transfer for students. At Camden County College, in New Jersey, library personnel are leading the charge. Information-literacy librarian Lori Lenox has been teaching both students and instructors the power of using AI tools for research — and the ways they can come up with some pretty bad responses to queries. Andy Woodworth, a systems and web-services librarian, has developed [an admirably comprehensive guide]( to a wide range of topics related to AI and higher ed. Yet in his note to me, Woodworth said he’s now finding it useful to look beyond higher ed — at things like data-center investments, chip-design announcements, and geopolitics — to better understand the AI developments likely to affect colleges in the future. “The AI chatbots that are now being pushed by vendors come from somewhere,” Woodworth wrote, “and understanding the underlying players helps inform me as to what has merit and what has hype.” Of course not all responses were examples of campuses enthusiastically leaning into AI. Lew Ludwig, a math professor at Denison College and director of its Center for Learning and Teaching, wrote that he’s encountered “mounting avoidance of this new technology” at his liberal-arts college, in Ohio. At the sessions he’s held for professors at the center, he said, “three or four of my 220 faculty show up, even with a stipend.” (He’s also penned [a Harry Potter-themed analogy]( that laments higher ed’s reluctance to wrestle with “yet another potentially disruptive enchantment.”) In that same blog post, Ludwig channels the message of Ethan Mollick, a Wharton School professor and author of a new book, [Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI]( who argues that professors and others in higher education need to directly explore AI tools. To do otherwise, Ludwig wrote, is “effectively outsourcing our role in shaping the future of this transformative technology to a few tech executives.” The Supreme Court affirms the CFPB’s future Throughout its 14-year life, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has played [a key role]( policing the lending practices of for-profit colleges, the credit-card deals colleges offer to their students, and the operating procedures of organizations that service student loans. Its right to exist has also been frequently under attack. But earlier this month [the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7 to 2 to legitimize the way it’s funded,]( decision that assures the bureau will stay on the scene for the foreseeable future. Join our discussion this week on the trust gap Sometimes it seems that the Mars-Venus analogy applies all too well to administrators and faculty members. But with financial pressures growing and enrollments falling at many colleges, the need for greater understanding — and collaboration — has never been more vital. What does it take to find common ground? Can new models of shared governance bridge these divides? Please join me on Thursday, May 23, at 2 p.m. Eastern, as I explore those questions and dive into related survey data on a Chronicle virtual panel. [Sign up here]( to tune in and pose questions live, or watch on demand. Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, [find them here](. To receive your own copy, free, register [here](. If you want to follow me on X, [@GoldieStandard]( is my handle. Or find me on BlueSky Social, which I just joined with [the same handle](. UPCOMING PROGRAM [The Chronicle's Strategic-Leadership Program for Department Chairs | June 2024] [Join us in June]( for a professional development program tailored to the needs of department chairs. Experienced academic leaders will provide insights on the the current trends in higher ed, effective ways to manage a department, strategic planning, and more. [Register today!]( Goldie's Picks WHAT MOTIVATES STUDENTS [Colleges Are Selling Themselves as Wage-Boosters. They Have Something Better to Offer.]( By Scott Carlson and Ned Laff [STORY IMAGE]( Many workers care more about finding purpose in their jobs than they do about pay. Why did colleges stop emphasizing their role in the search for meaning? SUPPLY-CHAIN WOES [Why Won’t More College Students Tutor Schoolchildren?]( By Kelly Field [STORY IMAGE]( Work-study jobs in local schools could save colleges money, stanch learning loss, and raise student engagement. But hurdles abound. ‘THOSE MISTAKES ADDED UP’ [The War in the Mideast Fuels a Crisis in the Midwest]( By Kate Hidalgo Bellows [STORY IMAGE]( Indiana University at Bloomington made a series of unpopular decisions. Then it called the police on protesters. CAREER RESOURCES [May article collection about moving into administration ] [Read the May collection]( for insights on moving into administration. Find out what you need to know before starting a senior position, the rewards of being in administration, and more! ADVERTISEMENT FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [Fostering Students' Free Expression - Buy Now]( [Higher Education in 2035]( Higher education is facing an array of challenges: economic headwinds, political pressures, and shifting demographics. [Order your copy]( to help your institution prepare for what’s ahead, and discover how the sector will evolve in the coming decade. JOB OPPORTUNITIES [Search jobs on The Chronicle job board]( [Find Your Next Role Today]( Whether you are actively or passively searching for your next career opportunity, The Chronicle is here to support you throughout your job search. Get started now by [exploring 30,000+ openings]( or [signing up for job alerts](. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2024 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

EDM Keywords (218)

writing wrestle working well week web ways way watch war want vital virginia view videos vehicle value useful used use university universities understanding understand tune tools today tip throughout thought templates technology technologists teaching teach taking take systems syllabi support students strategies stipend stay starting spend speed soliciting skill site simplify signing sharing share shaping sessions series sent selling seems sector search scene scan saw samuel said role right rich rewards responses resources resource research reluctance receive really realize readings read questions question pushed professors professor probably prerequisite preparing power policies police played plans picks pay pave others organized organizations opinions operate one ohio offer note newsletter never needs need moving month midwest microsoft message merit media many manage lower like legitimize learning leading know june joined jobs jay instructors institutions insights initiative information individual impressed idea hype hoping highlights highlight help held hands handle giant get geopolitics future frequently four forwarded follow finding find feel faculty facing explore exist exercises exciting examples evolve even engaging email efforts education eastern earlier dive discussion discover director diminishing developed culture crisis crafting course could copy content community committees come college colleagues collaboration circumstances chronicle cheating cfpb center called bureau building board available author attack assures assignment array argues appreciate anxiety also allowed ai ahead advises advice advertisement administrators administration actively able

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

11/10/2024

Sent On

10/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

05/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.