Newsletter Subject

When Will This End?

From

chooseyourselffinancial.com

Email Address

james@jamesaltucher.com

Sent On

Thu, Apr 2, 2020 07:51 PM

Email Preheader Text

The stimulus only works if the economy is OPEN. Else, you are giving electric shock to a patient who

The stimulus only works if the economy is OPEN. Else, you are giving electric shock to a patient who’s already dead. April 2, 2020 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [WEBSITE]( [Altucher Confidential] “The stimulus only works if the economy is OPEN. Else, you are giving electric shock to a patient who’s already dead.” [Enable Images To See More] When Will This End? By James Altucher Wall Street’s gonna have a heart attack when it sees this clip [Must watch by Midnight Friday] [Doug and Graham]( That’s because one of their most trusted trading analysts is [stepping out from the shadows…]( To give YOU the [secret moneymaking tactic]( that could even the score between you and them… Or even put you WAY up in points (and profits). To discover this savvy way of potentially winning 83%–92% of your trades from now on,[just click here.]( There's been data flying back and forth. Every university has a "model." Every health official. Everybody on Twitter who in their spare time became a pandemic expert. Let's look at some of the models out there. The below model was considered by many to be the standard. Six days ago it projected that in New York there would be 50,000 hospitalizations by April 1 (see below graphic). [chart] Instead, there are 12,000. It was off by a factor of four in only six days. I can understand a bunch of PhDs being off by 10–20% in six days but there are 1/4 the number of hospitalizations they projected. What went wrong? I hope "What went wrong?" is a question a lot of people ask when this is over. What went wrong with not only U.S. preparation but the entire Western world? What went wrong with the CDC, which was aware in 2005 that chloroquine could be a possible remedy for SARS and other coronaviruses? But most of all, what went wrong with almost EVERY single model that predicted exponential growth and millions and millions of deaths by now? Imperial College, Harvard, University of Washington, The New York Times, on and on and on. The answer is straightforward. They all assumed exponential growth. They used sixth grade math to make predictions rather than take into account that this virus, like every virus in world history, does not have exponential growth. Something only has exponential growth when there are no boundaries. Eventually, if there are boundaries, then the growth stops being exponential, starts to flatten, and then starts to go down. What are the boundaries to this virus? There’s nothing I love more than helping people make more money. [James Altucher](You have to see my newest book — it could change your life. Stop running in circles and take charge of your future. [Click here now]( to learn how to claim your free copy of my book. Population, demographics, immune populations, the amount of exposure different groups have to the virus, possible mutations, possible weather effects, we don't really know. There's one paper I found that takes all of this into account. It looks at each country, and even each state, where the virus hit. It looks at how many times the virus doubled (i.e., how long was it still exponential?)... and then how long it took for the "second derivative" to go negative (i.e., how long it took before the acceleration of the virus's growth started to go down, even though new cases/deaths were still rising)... and then how long it took for the virus to get under control (i.e., the number of cases/deaths started going down to the point where they quickly became negligible.) The paper is by Gerard Tellis of USC, and is titled: "[How Long Should Social Distancing Last](?" He looks at the ONLY important math: How many doubles does the virus make? And when does the growth rate (the second derivative of the growth in cases/deaths) start to go negative? This is what you need to know to determine the peak of the virus and when it will end. No other paper that I have looked at has done this. In part because, until now, the data wasn't there. It was possible to make a guess based on China, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Sweden, and even Italy and now Spain. But guesswork is not good enough for an academic paper. Here is the main table to focus on. [new your] The curve in every location basically remains the same. So based on prior curves, and based on the data so far in locations that are still "pending," they can extrapolate and figure out roughly when a location will hit its peak and when the virus cases will start going down quickly. In Spain, for instance, it forecast a peak yesterday. Just eyeing the data... [chart] You can maybe guess that Spain's growth ended about a week ago but it's still been volatile. The model predicts yesterday as the peak and April 14 the date the virus will be fully under control. In New York, it estimates April 5, with the virus fully under control around April 22. These are only estimates and can vary a little bit. This is the first paper that seems to take into account the inevitable slowdown in exponential growth. What does this all mean? I hope it means that the government is able to take this seriously when the data fully reveals itself, and, as cases lessen, as fewer hospital beds are needed, as the country gets on the road to health recovery (even though there will still be cases), that a plan is put into place to fully reopen the economy. The stimulus is going to be great. But the stimulus only works if the economy is OPEN. Else, you are giving electric shock to a patient who’s already dead. It's useless. The economy needs to come to life. Sincerely, [James Altucher] James Altucher The Mysterious Retirement Benefits Book That’s Changing Lives… [Mysterious book]( Inside [THIS MYSTERIOUS BOOK,]( you’ll find 100 life-changing ways to maximize your retirement benefits… These folks have already read it and shared their stories online: $50,000 in Benefits… Just Like That! “Told us exactly how to get over $50,000 more in the first 4 years of my wife receiving her benefits. And 32% more every year thereafter.” — Don T. My Wife and I Got $17,000 Right Off the Bat! “Excellent book! Making my wife and I almost $17,000 right off the bat and increasing our retirement income by well over a third. Purchase of this book was my biggest and best investment ever!” — Rick M. Added Over $1,000 to My Monthly Payment! “Told my friend who has just reached her retirement age about the spousal benefit… but is now able to add over $1,000 a month to her payment. People just are not aware of this, and everyone should be. I am so grateful to the person who recommended this book to me!!” — Andreas I. [Click here to learn how to claim your copy now while they last.]( Subsribe To My Podcast [The James Altucher Show]( Add james@jamesaltucher.com to your address book: [Whitelist Us]( [The James Altucher Website]( [Subscribe Via Text]( [Subscribe With YouTube]( [Subscribe On Messenger]( [Subscribe With iTunes]( [Connected on LinkedIn]( Join the conversation! Follow me on social media: [Facebook Group]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Pinterest]( [Instagram]( Altucher Confidential is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Choose Yourself Media delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Altucher Confidential e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Altucher Confidential, feel free to [click here](. Please read our [Privacy Statement](. For any further comments or concerns please [contact us here.]( If you are you having trouble receiving your Altucher Confidential subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox [by whitelisting Altucher Confidential](. © 2020 Choose Yourself Media, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. EMAIL REFERENCE ID: 430ALCED01

Marketing emails from chooseyourselffinancial.com

View More
Sent On

22/04/2020

Sent On

21/04/2020

Sent On

19/04/2020

Sent On

17/04/2020

Sent On

15/04/2020

Sent On

14/04/2020

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.