Newsletter Subject

'Sucker Yield' or Not... This Investment Is a Trap

From

chaikinanalytics.com

Email Address

powerfeed@exct.chaikinanalytics.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 1, 2023 01:47 PM

Email Preheader Text

I've warned you about avoiding the trap of "sucker yields" in the past... Suppose ABC Inc. pays a $1

I've warned you about avoiding the trap of "sucker yields" in the past... Suppose ABC Inc. pays a $1 dividend and trades at $25 per share. [Chaikin PowerFeed]( 'Sucker Yield' or Not... This Investment Is a Trap By Marc Gerstein, director of research, Chaikin Analytics I've warned you about [avoiding the trap of "sucker yields" in the past](... Suppose ABC Inc. pays a $1 dividend and trades at $25 per share. That's a 4% yield. Now, assume investors worry that ABC Inc. can't afford to keep paying that dividend. The stock might then fall to, say, $10 per share. So it looks like it's now a 10% yield. But good luck with that... If the company cuts the dividend, any suckers who believed in the 10% yield will wind up with zero. And they'd likely be stuck with a bad company and no real reason to own shares. That's pretty easy to understand, right? Well, in today's essay, I'll cover an intriguing twist to this idea... As you'll see, one investment yields nearly 13% today. And even better, it's not technically a "sucker yield" because the monthly dividend probably won't fall much – if at all. But as I'll explain, it's still a trap that investors should avoid today... Recommended Links: [Here's What You Missed Last Night]( The man who nailed the Melt Up explains why a rare moment is coming for stocks this year and how it could open the biggest moneymaking opportunity of the next 20 years. You could have doubled your money more than a dozen times with his picks, so be sure to watch his exclusive interview while it's still online, and [click here for his FREE recommendation for 2023](. [The #1 Gold Play for 2023]( Some of the richest men in the world are jumping into gold right now... because evidence suggests we could see MUCH HIGHER prices in the coming weeks. But if you're not taking advantage of a little-known way to invest for around $5 today, you're missing out. [Click here for full details](. The investment I'm talking about is the Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Fund (QYLD). In short, QYLD invests in the stocks in the Nasdaq 100 Index. That's just like the more-recognizable Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ). But there's one important difference... QYLD goes a step further. This exchange-traded fund ("ETF") also generates income for shareholders by selling call options on the Nasdaq 100 Index. Index options don't involve the transfer of stocks. They're "cash settled." The money value at the end of a trade is the difference between the index price on which you bet (the "strike price") and the actual value of the index at expiration. And the folks running QYLD choose "at the money" strike prices with end-of-month expirations. In other words, they bet on the Nasdaq 100 staying flat during the month. On the third Friday of each month, QYLD's managers sell a new at-the-money call for the next month. The money ("premiums") that QYLD received from selling these options counts as income. Most of these premiums are paid to shareholders as dividends. And they're in addition to any regular dividend income the ETF receives from the companies in which it invests. And the thing is... QYLD pays a pretty hefty 12.8% annual dividend yield today. QYLD's dividends vary based on market conditions. But they've been much more stable than typical sucker-yield stocks. Take a look at QYLD's lifetime dividend track record... [Chaikin PowerFeed] As you can see, QYLD pays out a dividend between $0.10 and $0.25 every month. And it has done that consistently for the past decade. If the Nasdaq 100 falls during a month, the option trade is successful... QLYD keeps the premium and pays income to shareholders. And it profits from the cash settlement (a positive difference between the strike price and the actual index's price). It's a classic "hedge" for investors in the Nasdaq 100... In bear markets, it can work well. Option profits offset part of the Nasdaq 100's declines. But here's where things become too good to be true... You see, QYLD lags when the market is moving higher. Rising share prices are great. But option losses from betting against an index that's moving up cut into investors' returns. The following table shows how QYLD's total return (price change and dividends) compared with QQQ across various time periods over the past decade. Take a look... [Chaikin PowerFeed] In theory, a more stable, income-generating alternative to QQQ sounds great. But as you can see, it doesn't really work in practice. Sure, investing in Big Tech companies remains risky at the moment. However, with the market [possibly near a major bottom]( it doesn't seem wise to bet against the Nasdaq 100. In the end, I hope my point is clear... QYLD isn't technically a "sucker yield." But it's still a losing bet for investors. Avoid falling into this trap. Good investing, Marc Gerstein Market View Major Indexes and Notable Sectors # Hld: Bullish Neutral Bearish Dow 30 +1.09% 11 15 4 S&P 500 +1.47% 160 278 62 Nasdaq +1.50% 36 50 15 Small Caps +2.44% 601 1024 265 Bonds +0.80% Consumer Discretionary +2.29% 20 28 8 — According to the Chaikin Power Bar, Small Cap stocks and Large Cap stocks remain Bullish. Major indexes are mixed. * * * * Sector Tracker Sector movement over the last 5 days Discretionary +5.47% Real Estate +2.76% Communication +2.23% Financial +2.21% Materials +1.87% Information Technology +1.26% Industrials +1.11% Staples +0.81% Health Care -0.10% Energy -0.39% Utilities -0.73% * * * * Industry Focus Mining Services 21 11 1 Over the past 6 months, the Mining subsector (XME) has outperformed the S&P 500 by +20.79%. Its Power Bar ratio, which measures future potential, is Very Strong, with more Bullish than Bearish stocks. It is currently ranked #5 of 21 subsectors and has moved down 1 slot over the past week. Top Stocks [rating] CMC Commercial Metals Co [rating] STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. [rating] SCHN Schnitzer Steel Indu * * * * Top Movers Gainers [rating] AOS +13.67% [rating] IP +10.66% [rating] PHM +9.43% [rating] PNR +9.23% [rating] GM +8.35% Losers [rating] PSX -5.78% [rating] GLW -4.89% [rating] CAT -3.52% [rating] MRNA -2.66% [rating] MU -2.28% * * * * Earnings Report Reporting Today Rating Before Open After Close ABC, MO, TMO AFL, GL, HOLX, MET BSX, FTV, HUM, JCI, ODFL, OTIS, TMUS, WRK ALGN, ALL, CHRW, CTVA, DXC, IEX, MAA, MCK, META, PTC, QRVO TECH, WM No earnings reporting today. Earnings Surprises [rating] MTCH Match Group, Inc. Q4 $0.87 Beat by $0.24 [rating] NVR NVR, Inc. Q4 $133.44 Beat by $34.56 [rating] GM General Motors Company Q4 $2.12 Beat by $0.44 [rating] CB Chubb Limited Q4 $3.17 Beat by $0.56 [rating] MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation Q4 $6.65 Beat by $1.02 * * * * You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to PowerFeed. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from PowerFeed, [click here](. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call [+1 (877) 697-6783 (U.S.)](tel:18776976783), 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Eastern time or e-mail info@chaikinanalytics.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Chaikin Analytics, LLC. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Chaikin Analytics, LLC. 201 King Of Prussia Rd., Suite 650, Radnor, PA 19087. [www.chaikinanalytics.com.]( Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Chaikin Analytics, LLC, does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Chaikin Analytics forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Chaikin Analytics, LLC (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from chaikinanalytics.com

View More
Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

16/04/2024

Sent On

16/04/2024

Sent On

15/04/2024

Sent On

15/04/2024

Sent On

14/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.