Newsletter Subject

đź’° Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: How To Survive A Cooler

From

cardplayer.com

Email Address

noreply@cardplayer.com

Sent On

Tue, Jun 11, 2024 07:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

Is this email not displaying correctly? . Jun 11, 2024 I recently played a hand on the second day of

Is this email not displaying correctly? [View it in your browser](. Jun 11, 2024 [Poker Strategy With Jonatha]( Little: How To Survive A Cooler]( I recently played a hand on the second day of a $1,500 buy-in poker tournament where I decided to play cautiously with pocket kings, which resulted in me not going broke. It was a situation where many other players would have, but by playing the hand that way, it allowed me to stay in the tournament and continue grinding out my expected value. With blinds at 500-1,000, I raised to 2,400 out of my 200,000 stack from first position with K[Heart Suit] K[Diamond Suit]. The player in the lojack, a somewhat tight, straightforward player who seemed to be in line, thought for a while, messed around with his chips in an odd way, then three-bet to 6,300 out of his 130,000 stack. I learned from Zach Elwood’s chapter in my book Excelling at No-Limit Hold’em that when people take a long time and then act in a somewhat bizarre manner, that they usually have an abnormally strong range. While K-K is obviously a strong value hand, I decided to call just in case I happened to be against A-A. The flop came 10[Heart Suit] 7[Club Suit] 4[Spade Suit]. I checked and my opponent checked behind. At this point, I assumed his range was mostly A-K, A-Q, and various other unpaired hands. He could have overpairs, but I assumed he would continuation bet those for value. He could also have sets, 10-10 and 7-7, but there are very few combinations of those hands, plus I thought he would value bet those as well. Some other hands he could check behind include A-10, J-10, and 9-9, although I did not think he would make a preflop three-bet with those. The turn was the 8[Heart Suit]. Because I thought my opponent’s range was mostly worse made hands and unpaired hands, I bet 6,500 into the 14,900 pot. Much to my surprise, my opponent quickly raised to 20,000. I was not sure what to make of my opponent’s range at this point, but I thought he may be trying to “buy” a free showdown with a hand like J-J or A-10. I thought he may have also viewed my small turn bet as weak, which of course is not the case because I would make that same turn bet size with all the holdings I wanted to bet. All of this led me to call. Notice reraising the turn has no merit because if I happen to be against A-A or a set, I want to minimize my losses. The river was the 3[Heart Suit]. I checked and my opponent immediately checked behind. I assumed I won against a worse overpair, top pair, or a random bluff, but my opponent proudly tabled A-A after seeing my K-K. If my opponent had bet the river instead of checking, I would have certainly called because I was wary that my small turn bet may have induced him to bluff or overvalue a worse made hand. In tournaments filled with mostly recreational players, you will find that a large portion of your win rate comes from your opponents’ poor plays, not your own great plays. While I minimized my losses by just calling my opponent’s preflop three-bet, my opponent made a huge blunder by not betting every street. Especially in main events full of recreational poker players, it is important to minimize your losses in cooler situations in order to give your opponents additional opportunities to make errors against you in the future. If you want more resources to help you improve your game, I put together a course called The 25 Biggest Leaks and How to Fix Them. This course is completely free inside Card Player Poker School! When you join the [Card Player Poker School]( (it’s free to join), you’ll also get: ✔ Free downloadable preflop charts ✔ GTO preflop charts ✔ Video Classes ✔ Interactive Hand Quizzes ✔ Free Course: Master the Fundamentals ✔ Free Course: The 25 Biggest Leaks and How to Fix Them ✔ Free training every week If you want to increase your poker skills and learn to crush the games, check out Jonathan Little’s elite training site at [PokerCoaching.com/CardPlayer](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2024 Card Player Media, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Card Player Media 6940 O'Bannon DriveLas Vegas, NV 89117 [Add us to your address book]( [unsubscribe from this list]( | [update subscription preferences]( | [view email in browser](

Marketing emails from cardplayer.com

View More
Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

22/06/2024

Sent On

16/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.