Newsletter Subject

Can You Spot the Forgery? This AI Can...

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Aug 1, 2023 08:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Can You Spot the Forgery? This AI Can... By Colin Tedards, Editor, The Bleeding Edge Dear Reader, In

[The Bleeding Edge]( Can You Spot the Forgery? This AI Can... By Colin Tedards, Editor, The Bleeding Edge Dear Reader, In October 2009, one asset appreciated in value by 150,000,000%... And it happened in an instant. The asset in question wasn’t a stock or even a cryptocurrency. It was a painting. This painting, to be specific. Source: Wikimedia Commons Previously known as Young Girl in Profile in Renaissance Dress, the painting was sold at an auction in 2007 for $22,000. But the owner of the piece felt that the artwork had been misattributed. So, he sought a second opinion. Recommended Link [He Declined to Go on CNBC – Now He’s Finally Revealing His “Millionaire Secret”]( [image]( During the 2008 financial crisis, millionaire trader Jeff Clark stunned the world when he managed to double his readers’ money 26 TIMES… CNBC caught wind of this and asked Jeff to come on live TV to explain his secret. Jeff politely said no. And now, years later, Jeff is back to finally bring this secret into the light. …Revealing how anyone can collect returns of huge gains in just 8 days… in bullish AND bearish markets! And why you need to IGNORE 99.9% of the market, instead focusing on only ONE stock. [(ticker revealed here)]( Jeff says: “I am tired of watching as investors lose their shirts buying risky assets… even my OWN SON lost -60% in crypto & tech stocks… now I’m going to give him a [“Financial Intervention”]( to help him win his account back in 2023!” [Click Here to Watch Jeff Demonstrate This ONE Stock Secret.]( -- Art professionals reviewed the work and concluded that the owner was correct. The real creator, they deduced, was none other than Leonardo da Vinci. The value of La Bella Principessa, as it became known, was marked up to around $150 million. It was a dramatic turn of events. And it goes to show that proving a piece’s origin can mean the difference of hundreds of millions of dollars. Proving the work to be authentic might be the hardest part. Even today, the authenticity of La Bella Principessa is hotly contested. Art experts devote an entire career to a specific artist or time period. This makes the world of professional art authentication a very small and exclusive club. Researchers from the University of Bradford and the University of Nottingham are hoping new AI-powered models can unlock the real truth behind a painting’s origins. Recommended Link [“Amazon Loophole” could hand you $28,544 in “royalty” payouts]( [image]( Thanks to a little-known IRS loophole… Regular Americans can collect up to $28,544 (or more) in payouts from what Brad Thomas calls the “Amazon secret royalty program…” And the best part is, there are: - NO age or income requirements… (It’s available to anyone 18+ or older) - NO employment requirements… (You can be working part-time, full-time, or even be retired) - And you NEVER have to shop or sell a single product on Amazon… (It only takes 5 minutes to set up!) See how to collect the next payout before the strict cutoff deadline. [Watch short video now.]( Experts vs. AI In 1981, art collector George Lester Winward bought the de Brécy Tondo. Like the painting above, for the past 40 years, experts have largely agreed that the painting is a Victorian-era copy of the Sistine Madonna by Raphael. The de Brécy Tondo alongside Raphael’s 16th-century masterpiece, the Sistine Madonna Source: The University of Nottingham The similarities are striking. But skilled con-artists go to incredible lengths to replicate classic works. For instance, notorious forger Wolfgang Beltracchi teamed up with his wife to forge over 50 artists. He was successful for a time… making an estimated $100 million from fraudulent art. He was only caught because of a slip-up. He unknowingly used a paint that contained titanium oxide, a compound that wasn’t available until relatively recently. Art experts have relied on chemical analysis to sniff out frauds like Beltracchi. But advancements in AI are adding an extra tool for uncovering fakes and replicas. What’s notable about the de Brécy Tondo is that it's the first example of an AI asserting that a replica is the real thing. Using facial recognition technology, researchers determined that the face of the Virgin Mary has a 97% similarity to the authentic Sistine Madonna work. The face of the baby Jesus has an 86% probability of being from the same artist. The study, scheduled to be published later this year, considers a rating above 75% to be identical. The AI model measures more than just similarities seen with the naked eye. It analyzes the brush strokes and patterns that are consistent throughout an artist's work. An art expert is limited to what they can take in… going back and forth between the two paintings as their own biases blur the lines between objective and subjective analysis. AI doesn’t have the same failings. It can digest the totality of both images and overlay the similarities and differences at varying scales. I don’t know if the AI is right about the de Brécy Tondo’s origins. But I think the bigger question here is far more interesting. Recommended Link [The One Ticker Retirement Plan]( Over the Shoulder Demo Now Available [image]( Market Wizard Larry Benedict crushed the market in 2022. But he didn't do it with a “traditional” method… For a limited time, he’s sharing a free over-the-shoulder “demo” of his strategy in action. It takes less than 10 seconds… [Watch it here.]( -- Who Do You Trust? We’re quickly entering a world where artificial intelligence is “smarter” than any human expert. The question is, will we recognize its genius or dismiss it as faulty code? We’ve just seen how artificial intelligence has the potential to disrupt the fine art market, even “disagreeing” with a host of human experts. But we can see how this could easily apply to other areas. In the years ahead, would you trust artificial intelligence to diagnose you at the doctor’s office? Or perhaps we’ll rely on AI to tell us what news is real or fake. Would you feel comfortable letting an AI set the rate of a new loan? Or assess the value of an insurance claim? And more importantly, what happens when the AI disagrees with the “experts” in these given fields? Who do you trust? It may offer new ideas that challenge long-standing theories of biology, physics, and chemistry. And it may propose radically new concepts that at face value may seem foolish… but could be wise beyond our comprehension. Once again, I share this story to make the point that AI is more than just an investment trend. It has the potential to radically reorganize society and upend some long-held beliefs. It could be a very uncomfortable period for some people… The question for us is, do we fight against it or embrace it? Regards, Colin Tedards Editor, The Bleeding Edge --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@brownstoneresearch.com. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [WARNING: Mandatory U.S. Dollar Recall to Begin on September 20th?]( If you have any U.S. dollars in your bank account… You must see [this shocking video exposing the government’s new plan to recall the U.S. dollar.]( According to Business Insider, this recall “could be imminent.” And if you don’t prepare now, you could end up holding a bunch of worthless U.S. dollars. [Click here to see the three simple steps you can take now to protect your life savings.]( [image]( [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2023 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.