Newsletter Subject

Jeff Brown’s 2023 Predictions: The EV Revolution Has a Big Problem

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, Dec 22, 2022 09:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

Editor?s Note: Welcome back to Jeff Brown?s prediction series. Over the next several days, Jeff

[The Bleeding Edge]( Editor’s Note: Welcome back to Jeff Brown’s prediction series. Over the next several days, Jeff will share his biggest predictions for the new year. Today, we talk about the electric vehicle (EV) revolution. As Jeff says, EVs have a major hurdle ahead of them. And hardly anybody is discussing it. Read on… --------------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Brown’s 2023 Predictions: The EV Revolution Has a Big Problem By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge Van Bryan (VB): Jeff, I’d like to ask you about what the electric vehicle industry looks like next year. I understand you have a big prediction along these lines. Jeff Brown (JB): I do. But it’s worth taking a high-level look at where the industry is first. There’s this misconception that electric vehicles are already widely adopted. Depending on where we live, it’s likely we’re seeing electric vehicles on the road every day. But the reality is that we’re still in the early innings of what will be a multi-decade adoption cycle. It was really only in the last few years that we’ve started to see increased adoption. In 2020, there were about 3 million EV sales worldwide. By 2021, there were close to 7 million. And 2022 is likely to be even higher. So, this is incredible growth. But it’s still a relatively small part of the overall automotive market. This trend will play out over years and decades. Recommended Link [Forget Musk and Twitter]( [image]( Forget about Elon Musk buying Twitter. Because [there’s a bigger story brewing behind the scenes at Tesla.]( In short, Musk is taking Tesla in a new direction. He says it will be worth “probably several times that of what the car business is per year”… and could soon be 50% of Tesla’s business. He’s already invested over $10 billion in [this new venture (so far).]( And it could be well worth it. Because at stake is an emerging trend Forbes reports will be worth $130 trillion. But Musk isn’t the only billionaire vying for all this money. Five of the world’s richest men are backing a tiny small-cap that could wreck Elon Musk’s plans for Tesla’s future. Don’t be left behind, this tiny company behind huge opportunity trades for around $4. [Click here to learn why you should be investing in this too.]( -- VB: And you believe this adoption cycle won’t be as easy as many believe. Is that right? JB: That’s right. Governments – including the United States – have set very aggressive targets for EV adoption. But what most seem to be ignoring are the commodity constraints. The cars themselves aren’t really the problem (i.e. the steel, materials, and electronic components). The constraints are going to come with the batteries, specifically with the commodities needed to make these batteries. They’re really the long pole for the industry. Lithium is a perfect example. It’s a major input for lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries used in most EVs. And there just aren’t enough lithium mines in the world to produce enough of the commodity to meet the aggressive targets set for EV adoption. I gave a presentation on this topic back in March. And I shared a chart that showed the cost to produce an EV battery had been declining for years. But in 2022, something unexpected happened. The cost to produce an EV battery increased. And this has everything to do with rising commodity costs. VB: Why do you think the cost of EV battery metals are on the rise? JB: Part of it has to do with all the supply chain disruptions we’ve had over the past few years. And in the wake of the lockdowns, we had plenty of miners simply shut down. But we’ve also had a tidal wave of new demand in recent years. We should remember that for years, there was only one automotive company generating significant demand for these metals. That was Tesla. But in the last few years, virtually every major automaker has launched – or has plans to launch – an electric vehicle. They’re all desperately trying to catch up with Tesla. Toyota, GM, Ford – they’re all in. And that’s before we consider the new upstarts like Rivian, Lucid, and several others. It's a straightforward equation. More demand battling for less supply means prices go up. It means that these electric vehicles are more expensive to produce. And it’s created something of a landgrab for these metals. [Tiny $4 Company to “Steal” Billions From Tesla?]( And since the cost of the batteries make up the largest percentage of the cost of an EV, this will impact the rate of adoption, as most EVs will remain more expensive than their internal combustion engine (ICE) equivalents. VB: You also pointed out that the need for more battery metals could have a connection to the war in Ukraine. What was your conclusion there? JB: What most don’t know is that there’s about 500,000 tons of lithium oxide under the Ukraine. It’s probably the largest untapped lithium oxide reserve in the world. My suspicion is that one of the motivations for the U.S.’s proxy war there is to ensure that the supply of lithium stays accessible for future exploration to the West. Is that the only motivation? No. But I certainly think it’s a big incentive. VB: That turned out to be a controversial conclusion for some. JB: It was. And I was a little surprised. After all, nations have been waging wars for access to strategic commodities for literally centuries. In the past, that might have been access to agricultural land or oil. Is it so controversial to suggest that access to lithium and other metals is one motivation for some of these geopolitical conflicts? And if this is a zero-sum game, what wouldn’t nations do to maintain access? And we won’t hear this from the mainstream media, but there are numerous biological laboratories throughout the Ukraine that are funded by the United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). I’ve even reviewed documents myself posted on the website of the U.S. Embassy in the Ukraine that outlines the support for these laboratories. The documents even name a U.S.- based contractor from Kansas City – Black & Veatch – as the integrating contractor. Recommended Link [“I’m rooting for a recession – and you should too!”]( [image]( He called the bottom in 2020… He called the bottom in 2022… And now, he’s preparing for a “major shift” in the markets. [Get the details here – including the name of the #1 stock to protect yourself.]( -- I only mention this to demonstrate that what’s happening in the Ukraine isn’t “clean.” The conflict isn’t about some virtuous stand against Russia. Earlier this year, CBS reported that only 30% to 40% of the aid being sent by the U.S. actually gets to where it needs to go. The rest is siphoned off for other purposes – none of which would make U.S. taxpayers happy. Maybe some subscribers think I went out on a limb. But it’s very naive to think that the U.S. is spending $100 billion supporting the Ukraine – more than the U.S. spends on its own U.S. infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) – just to take a philosophical stand against Russia, and that 100% of the aid is getting to where it needs to go with no accounting in place. Just look at the pandemic policy program – the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Even NBC News calls it the “Biggest Fraud in a Generation,” claiming that more than $400 billion was stolen. If the current government can’t properly manage and account for a domestic aid and stimulus program, is it that hard to believe that there’s corruption associated with the $100 billion and growing being sent to the Ukraine? I know that topics like this are uncomfortable to think about. None of us want them to be true. After all, these are U.S. taxpayer dollars, and there are clearly domestic needs. But as an analyst, these are the facts – whether I like them or not. [The #1 stock for 2023]( And the Ukraine’s lithium oxide reserves are critical for the U.S. EV battery production goals. It won’t solve the shortage in metals for battery production, but it’s a critical resource for future production. We’ll of course be tracking this closely, and I’m confident that we’ll see this play out over the next couple of years. As the conflict eventually gets resolved, let’s watch and see which Western miners announce major deals for new lithium mines in the Ukraine. By then, the whole picture will unfold. And I think it will be obvious to all. VB: Let’s pivot back to what these shortages mean for the automotive industry. Why is it a problem? JB: The industry has always had a target in mind for the cost of electric vehicle production. The idea is that once battery production costs reach around $100 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) , then the cars will be comparable to an internal combustion-engine vehicle. In other words, the cost to the consumer would be roughly the same as a traditional car. I actually think the number needs to be a bit lower, but that $100 per kWh target has been long-held by the industry, including Tesla. Recommended Link [Extra $1,420 in seconds? You won’t believe this…]( [image]( This has nothing to do with dividends, day trading... taking out a loan… or anything like that. What you need is about 3 seconds to execute this simple financial maneuver… And you could be generating $230… $630… even $1,420 or more… In the next hour. [Click here to learn how!]( -- And for years, it looked like that target was inevitable. Battery production costs have been declining year after year. And the idea was that it was only a matter of time before we got to that $100 per kWh mark. But it hasn’t happened. Many of these automotive executives either misunderstood or simply ignored these market dynamics. And this is going to be a major problem for automakers, especially those that have gone “all in” on EVs in the past two years. Ford is a perfect example. Ford recently unveiled its Ford Lighting. It’s basically an electric version of the F-150. Pre-orders were sold out almost immediately. But then something happened. Ford raised the prices on the trucks. When the truck was first announced, the base model was $40,000. But the economics didn’t make sense for all the reasons we just discussed. Ford had to raise the prices to $53,769. That’s a big increase. Meanwhile, the very basic model of the F-150 – with the internal combustion engine – can usually be purchased between $35,000 and $40,000. And of course, this truck has a longer range and can easily be refueled at any gas station. So, what’s a consumer going to do? They’re going to buy the F-150. And I know some will say that there are still plenty of tax incentives for electric vehicles. And that’s true. But is that really our long-term plan? That governments will subsidize electric vehicles forever? Subsidies have been in place for more than a decade, and they continue. And the reality of rising commodities prices has thrown a wrench into the timeline when many EVs can reach price parity with ICE equivalents. As I look into 2023, I predict that we’ll see one or two EV manufacturers lower their production forecasts because they simply don’t have the batteries to “fuel” their EVs. The industry, and the U.S. government, is going to learn a major lesson over the next couple of years. VB: Would any company be immune? JB: Maybe unsurprisingly, Tesla is in the best position right now. The company has been ahead of the curve for years. The reality is that Tesla is the only EV company that’s been aggressively and proactively putting in place supply agreements with mining companies years in advance of current production. All other automakers are scrambling to catch up. In 2020, Tesla announced it had purchased the rights to a 10,000-acre lithium deposit in the Nevada desert. And earlier this year, Tesla signed a deal with a nickel mine in Minnesota to buy 75,000 tons over the next six years. And as usual, there were plenty in the mainstream press who didn’t understand this. Why is Musk getting into the mining business? But it was precisely for this reason. It was a brilliant chess move. And it’s paid off. This year, Tesla said it was able to directly source 95% of its lithium hydroxide. About half of its cobalt was directly sourced. And it was about one-third for nickel. This is a remarkable competitive advantage. And I don’t think people realize the long-term benefits this will give Tesla. Even Tesla’s EV battery technology is a competitive advantage, minimizing the amount of cobalt needed for production – an expensive metal that comes from volatile markets with poor labor practices. So, we could be looking at a scenario where other automakers either stall or stop production of new EVs next year while Tesla carries on. VB: And probably the most important question: What should investors do with all of this information? JB: The obvious answer is also the best one: Go straight to the source. Invest in the companies that mine and refine these metals like lithium. It was actually Elon Musk who said lithium refiners have a “license to print money.” And that’s what we’ve done. Just last month, we added my favorite lithium miner and refiner to our Near Future Report portfolio. Select commodities have been one of the only areas in the markets that have delivered positive returns this year. While historically The Near Future Report has focused on technology and biotechnology companies, I call it the “Near Future” for a reason. I’m focused on what’s growing right around the corner – it doesn’t matter what the industry is…. So I’m excited to see how that investment develops next year. [Editor’s Note: Subscribers to The Near Future Report can [catch up here](. And if you’d like to join Jeff’s flagship letter for the new year, we’d love to welcome you. [Learn more right here]( And longer term, there will be some very interesting investment opportunities around new battery technologies like solid-state batteries. And I would like readers to know that just because I’m pointing out these headwinds doesn’t mean I’m not excited for the future of electric vehicles. And by understanding the nuances of this industry, we’ll be able to find some truly incredible investments. VB: Thanks, Jeff. JB: Anytime. --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor’s Note: We’ll be back tomorrow with a new prediction from Jeff Brown. We’ll discuss the future of 5G and a looming consumer electronics “craze” that could replace all smartphones. You won’t want to miss it. --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@brownstoneresearch.com. --------------------------------------------------------------- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [1 Chart Reveals Why Many Americans Will Remain Poor 📊]( While most Americans fight to stay afloat The wealthy grow even richer Could this chart explain why? - Just 5% of ordinary folks own[this secretive investment]( - Compared to a whopping 81% of the ultra-rich Yahoo Finance says, “This is where millionaires keep their money.” We’ve discovered a way for ordinary people to stake a claim. [How $50 gets you into the #1 money secret of America’s wealthiest men.]( [image]( Get Instant Access Click to read these free reports and automatically sign up for daily research. [The Ultimate Guide to Taking Back Your Privacy]( [The 101 Guide to Pre-IPO Investing]( [The Trader’s Guide to Technical Analysis]( [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2022 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

EDM Keywords (285)

years year wrench world words whole west went welcome website way watch war want wake vb usually usual use unfold understanding understand uncomfortable ukraine turned true trucks truck trend trader tracking timeline time thrown thoughts think tesla technology target talk take suspicion support supply suggest subscribed stolen still started stake spends solve sold smartphones siphoned since simply showed shortage shared share set service sent seem see seconds scrambling scenes scenario says say russia roughly rooting rights right rest remember remain refueled refiner refine redistribution recession reasons reason really reality read rate raise questions purchased protect production produce problem probably privacy prices presentation preparing predict precisely posted pointing plenty play plans place past part paid outlines one oil obvious nuances nothing note none nickel needs need nations name naive musk motivations motivation money missed miss misconception minnesota mine mind might metals mention meet means mean matter markets march make love looking look lockdowns loan live lithium limb likely like license learn launched launch last landgrab laboratories know jb investors investing industry including impact image ignoring idea historically hear headwinds hard happening half guide growing governments government got gone going go getting gave future funded fuel focused first find feedback far expensive execute excited evs everything ev ensure embassy economics easy easily earlier done discussing discuss discovered details demonstrate declining decade deal curve critical course could cost corner controversial continue content constraints consider connection conflict confident conclusion comparable company companies commodity comes come cobalt closely close clean claim chart catch case cars called call buy business bottom believe batteries basically backing automakers ask areas analyst amount america always also aid ahead aggressively advance adoption added accounting account access able 5g 50 40 30 2023 2022 2021 2020 100

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.