Newsletter Subject

Capitulation of the Greenwashers

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, Oct 17, 2024 08:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

Capitulation of the Greenwashers By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge --------------------------

[The Bleeding Edge]( Capitulation of the Greenwashers By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge --------------------------------------------------------------- Since 2007, Google had been making a “virtuous” claim. It declared it was carbon neutral and had implemented sustainable business practices. How was this possible? The scale of Google’s operations, even back then, was massive. Not only are its office footprints huge, but it also maintains massive data center facilities around the world. Its scale is hard to comprehend. Google’s Global Data Center Footprint | Source: Google And almost all of Google’s data centers are fueled entirely by carbon-based energy. It’s the only way the company can ensure 24/7 operations on a global scale. So how could Google claim carbon neutrality for so long? Google, like other companies, did this by waving a wand and purchasing carbon offsets – financial instruments designed to offset carbon emissions. They are used to “greenwash” corporations’ use of carbon-based energy, allowing them to make marketing claims of being carbon neutral. But something happened in the last few years. That something, of course, was the explosion in artificial intelligence (AI) research and development. And with it, the need for drastically larger data centers, computing power, and, of course, electricity. This July, Alphabet (Google) had to come clean. It announced that its carbon emissions were up 50% since 2019 because of its data center expansion. It also shared that its 2023 carbon emissions were up 13% over 2022. And in a striking admission, in its latest environmental report, Google announced that “starting in 2023, we’re no longer maintaining operational carbon neutrality.” And it stopped buying carbon offsets. Capitulation. The growth of its data centers and artificial intelligence initiatives was simply too great. It became impossible to maintain the charade of carbon neutrality. Recommended Link [This Technology Could Swing The Election]( [image]( Whoever wins the presidential election – Trump or Harris – [this energy breakthrough]( could see their popularity skyrocket. Now, billions of dollars are amassing behind this tech, with everyone from Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates to Sam Altman and Warren Buffett [pouring their money into this phenomenon](. Stocks connected to this breakthrough are already moving. [Don’t be left behind.]( -- Out of Necessity Google needed to lean in. Press the reset button. It chose growth over maintaining its carbon neutrality charade. And it has charted a new path forward – one that provides for even more electricity production, not less. So it was a pleasant surprise to hear this week that Google announced that it will do something tangible and concrete to achieve its desire for clean energy. It will back the construction of seven small modular reactors (SMR) in the U.S. Google had entered into a power purchase agreement, committing to buying power from these seven future reactors, which will be built by private nuclear power company [Kairos Power](. Kairos Power is a peculiar choice because it is still very early stage and has limited funding to date. In 2019, it received a $10 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy and does not appear to have raised any large institutional capital since then. Kairos’s approach to advanced nuclear fission power is through a pebble bed reactor design. Shown below on the left, the pebble bed reactor is fueled by ceramic “pebbles” that contain Tri-structural ISOtropic (TRISO) fuel. The fuel is made up of uranium, carbon, and oxygen. Kairos Pebble Bed Reactor | Source: Kairos Power What makes pebble bed reactors interesting is that the ceramic coating prevents the release of radioactive fission products. The TRISO fuel is more resistant to neutron irradiation and corrosion, as compared to traditional nuclear fuels used in fission reactors. The other major benefit is that the TRISO particles cannot melt, even in a high-temperature reactor. That means the reactor can’t melt down. Pebble bed reactors are an inherently safe reactor design. Kairos uses molten fluoride salt as a coolant. This transfers heat well at very high temperatures, is chemically stable, and does a good job of retaining any radioactive byproducts from the fission reaction that might be released by the fuel. While the terms of the deal between Google and Kairos were not disclosed, my working assumption is that Google will provide advanced payment as part of the deal. Kairos simply will not be able to build its SMRs to support Google without the capital to do so. And the agreement with Google will give Kairos the ability to go out and raise even more capital from institutional investors. The schedule is for Kairos to “turn on” the seven reactors for Google between 2030 and 2035. In the nuclear power industry, a six-year timeline to the first operational nuclear reactor is pretty fast, which is why I’m assuming that there is a lot of capital involved in the deal. The deal envisions bringing a total of 500 megawatts of power online for Google, enough to power an entire mid-sized city in the U.S. Amazon Joins the Party If that wasn’t exciting enough, Amazon just announced yesterday a similar agreement. It signed three agreements directly supporting small modular reactor projects. Amazon is in the process of completely repositioning nuclear power as “clean.” Nuclear is a safe source of carbon-free energy that can help power our operations and meet the growing demands of our customers while helping us progress toward our Climate Pledge commitment to be net-zero carbon across our operations by 2040. – Matt Garman, CEO of Amazon Web Services In Washington state – the home of Amazon’s headquarters – Amazon signed a deal with Energy Northwest, which is a consortium of state public power utilities, to develop four SMRs for Amazon. Those reactors will generate 320 megawatts of power initially, growing to 960 megawatts, scheduled to come online by the early 2030s. Related to that deal, is a $500 million investment in [X-energy]( a more mature private company that had already raised about $385 million before Amazon’s investment. Interestingly, X-energy’s nuclear fission technology is also a pebble bed reactor that uses TRISO fuel. The main difference is that X-energy uses a high-temperature, gas-cooled reactor as opposed to molten fluoride salt as a coolant. X-energy Xe-100 Pebble Bed Reactor | Source: X-energy The $500 million investment from Amazon is designed to provide X-energy with enough manufacturing capacity to complete its SMR design and bring online more than five gigawatts of nuclear power. The third agreement that Amazon signed was with publicly traded Dominion Energy (D) to explore the development of a new SMR-based nuclear power plant close to Dominion’s North Anna nuclear power station. The target is to generate at least 300 megawatts of carbon-free energy in northern Virginia. All Aboard! The announcements from Google and Amazon this week follow Microsoft’s big announcement last month with Constellation Energy (CEG) to turn back on a nuclear reactor on Three Mile Island. We explored that development in [The Bleeding Edge – Microsoft’s Power Grab](. An announcement like this would have been unthinkable several years ago. How times have changed… Nuclear power is all the rage right now. It’s no longer a whisper behind closed doors. Deals like these are being announced with pride by the tech industry. In truth, there is no other choice for grid-scale, carbon-free energy. And this time, the tech companies that need gigawatts of electricity are proactively funding the development of next-generation nuclear power technology. They aren’t waiting for institutional investors, or the government, to take the risk. They are stepping up to fund it themselves. Finally, real, tangible, practical progress towards clean energy. Regards, Jeff [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2024 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.