Newsletter Subject

Welcome Home, NEO

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, Oct 3, 2024 09:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Welcome Home, NEO By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge -----------------------------------------

[The Bleeding Edge]( Welcome Home, NEO By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge --------------------------------------------------------------- Meet NEO Beta, a recently announced humanoid robot designed for the home. NEO Beta | Source: 1X Technologies Designed and developed by Norway-based 1X Technologies, NEO is one of the three primary contenders racing to develop a mass-market, general-purpose humanoid robot. 1X has currently raised about $140 million to date, a relatively small sum for such an ambitious goal, primarily backed by Norway-based investors. There are, however, three strategic investors worth noting. Neo’s Partners Who’s taken an interest in NEO? And what for? - Samsung NEXT Ventures, which is the venture capital arm of Samsung Electronics. Its interest will certainly be centered around selling semiconductors and sensors to what it sees will be an absolutely massive market for humanoid robots. - ADT Security Services (ADT), which is a well-known company for commercial and home monitoring and security systems. This is an interesting investment, as it provides a glimpse into ADT’s views on humanoid robots, specifically that ADT believes these robots can be used as part of a security system, which makes perfect sense. A humanoid robot powered by artificial intelligence (AI) that has sensors and computer vision can actively monitor any environment, investigate disturbances, and even automatically call police or emergency services when warranted. - OpenAI Startup Fund, which is OpenAI’s venture arm, is designed to propagate the use of its large language models (LLMs) into electronic devices. All humanoid robots will have on board multi-modal large language models that will act as a key part of their “brains,” capable of communicating with humans and interacting with the real world. Aside from a large number of hardware improvements in NEO Beta compared to the previous version Eve 2, the most obvious major change has been to evolve its humanoid robot form from operating on two wheels to a bipedal (two legs) humanoid design. NEO Beta | Source: 1X Technologies 1X has also made a leap in its training approach, using the real world and human examples as the most important inputs to training its neural network to achieve assigned tasks. 1X went so far as to say that as it trains NEO Beta, it probably won’t use past training data used with Eve 2, suggesting that its approach to software design has undergone a major change. This is the same approach that Tesla is using for Optimus, and Figure AI is using for its latest humanoid robot Figure 02. Figure 02 | Source: Figure AI In fact, Figure makes an interesting case study for what we might be seeing happening with 1X’s new NEO robot today. Recommended Link [Image]( [Meet ChatGPT’s Killer: Bill Gates]( I recently traveled to Wisconsin to investigate Bill Gates’ newest AI project ([Click here to see it with your own eyes]( I believe this new type of AI is so revolutionary that it will make ChatGPT as obsolete as VHS tapes. Believe it or not, this could end up being more valuable than Microsoft itself. [Click here to see the details]( because I found a way for you to profit from it. -- Figure’s Leapfrog Not too long ago, Figure AI was on par with 1X Technologies. However, Figure became a serious contender in the race to develop a general-purpose humanoid robot earlier this year when it raised $675 million. (To date, Figure AI has raised $845 million in total.) Far more telling were the two lead investors in the last round: Microsoft and OpenAI, which – as my readers know – are linked at the hip. Microsoft has already invested almost $14 billion in OpenAI and is the only company to have an exclusive license to OpenAI’s source code. The round was an absolute pile-on with 39 different investors contributing to the round, including Amazon and Bezos Expeditions (Jeff Bezos’ venture capital firm). Amazon and Jeff Bezos clearly want an alternative to Musk’s Optimus. Figure AI needed the capital. While it had made solid progress on the hardware for its humanoid robot, it was woefully behind in artificial intelligence. The reality was that Figure 01 didn’t have much of a “brain”. So Figure AI made a “shortcut” to catch up with Tesla’s Optimus – by incorporating OpenAI’s latest multi-modal large language models into its humanoid robot. It makes perfect sense to leverage the incredible work being done at OpenAI, and with the pace of improvements. Every new release of OpenAI’s LLMs will be relevant to Figure’s own humanoid development – and can be incorporated into Figure 02. And in a recent interview, Figure AI’s CEO Brett Adcock revealed even more… He said the value that Microsoft is bringing to the table is well above and beyond just capital. “Microsoft has given us as many H100 NDs as we need.” Said Adcock. He was, of course, referring to NVIDIA’s H100 GPUs, which are the workhorse semiconductors used to train AI. And there’s more… Chasing Optimus Adcock went further when he said, “So we’ve scaled up now three times in the last 90 days into larger clusters.” Gibberish to most… He’s referring to computational clusters of GPUs. Figure is ramping quickly. And this suggests rapid progress is being made on the software. Figure knows what every company in this space knows: If it spends more capital on computational power for training the AI models, the software that will run on Figure 02 will improve quickly. And the robot will learn how to do more… faster. More capital… More computational power… More electricity… Equals more training… I think we can all see the common thread by now: More… now. It has been incredible to watch how quickly the industry has gravitated towards Tesla’s design and approach to software for Optimus. All three players are leaning heavily on leveraging real-world data to train the humanoid robots on how to perform economically valuable tasks. This, of course, is nothing new to Tesla. It’s the same product development strategy it has been using for years. As long-time readers know, every Tesla car is equipped with seven cameras placed around the car. Each camera has a 250-meter depth of field. These cameras provide the primary inputs into the Tesla neural network – the backbone behind the company’s full self-driving (FSD) AI. Tesla collects all this data from its “fleet” of vehicles around the world, feeds it to its supercomputer, and then learns, optimizes, and improves its performance. Tesla has been doing this for years. And it’s now this software that Tesla is leveraging as the basis for Optimus’ mobility. The end goal is for a humanoid robot to operate in any unstructured environment much like how a Tesla car with FSD can drive on roads it has never “seen” or been trained on before without any geofencing. As for humanoid robots, the goal is to have a human provide directions to the robot, like, “NEO, watch me and learn how to assemble this device” or, “NEO, watch me and learn how to clean up this room and get it ready for bedtime.” Humanoid robots are being designed to be taught by humans. This is a necessity if they are to be general purpose. All of these hardware platforms – the humanoid robots -can receive software upgrades, just as any Tesla electric vehicle receives its updates today. With one push, every Tesla can download the latest FSD update… and receive all the newly learned capabilities. Humanoid robots will be no different. And all three companies know that the more humanoid robots they have in the field collecting data and improving in tasks – through trial and error – the faster they will be able to improve their AI software. When Will It Happen? 1X Technologies is currently gearing up its manufacturing capabilities. Its goal is to produce 100–200 NEOs a month in 2025 – the year it expects to first commercialize NEO. 2026 will bring even more scale to manufacturing, as well as developing a model of NEO for industrial applications. Figure AI has said that based on the rapid progress that it’s seeing with its own software development, it is moving up its schedule for in-home use for Figure 02. The race is heating up… Given that Figure AI has already been testing Figure 02 at the BMW plant in Spartanburg, South Carolina, a topic that we explored earlier this year in [Outer Limits – BMW Just Hired Its First Humanoid Robot]( it’s not unreasonable to project that we’ll see commercialization before the end of 2025. And we know that Tesla has already developed Optimus Gen 3 and has been testing it for months now. We should have an update soon from Tesla. But we already know that Optimus Gen 3 will have 22 degrees of freedom, even having the ability to play a piano, and will be sold for about $20,000 when production is at scale. While Tesla plans to absorb all of its Optimus production in 2025 for internal use in offices and factories, external commercialization is planned for 2026. And this is exactly why Figure AI and 1X Technologies are pushing as fast as they can to get a competitive robot into the market before the end of 2025. They have been trailing behind Tesla’s incredible progress. Consider this… - Tesla is not constrained by compute. It already has its Dojo supercomputer where it trains its full self-driving (FSD) software. - Tesla is not constrained by capital. It has $30 billion in cash and will generate more than $2 billion a year in free cash flow this year. - Tesla is not constrained by technology. Tesla went so far as to not only develop its own hardware for Optimus but to develop its own AI-specific semiconductor – the D1 – so it isn’t beholden to NVIDIA. The D1 is manufactured by TSMC in Taiwan. - Tesla has already mastered autonomy through its FSD software used in its EVs. This has been the foundation for giving Optimus its autonomy to “drive” itself in the real world, on foot. The timelines and the technology are converging. It has already been an incredible year for humanoid robots. And next year, we will be able to greet the first humanoid robot in our homes. [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2024 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.