Newsletter Subject

Shut It Down

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Mon, Jul 15, 2024 09:25 PM

Email Preheader Text

Shut It Down By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge In The Bleeding Edge, we have the pleasure of

[The Bleeding Edge]( Shut It Down By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge In The Bleeding Edge, we have the pleasure of focusing most of our attention on the positive and exciting developments in the world of high-tech and biotech. These developments are accelerating the pace of advancement in ways that will improve our quality of life. And naturally, these developments and insights give us direction as we look for compelling investment opportunities. This month’s recommendation in Exponential Tech Investor, which came out today, is a perfect example of that. But every once in a while, we’ll have a look at the failures and mistakes as well. After all, that’s a critical part of the learning process. Bad ideas, bad tech, bad execution, bad management, bad actors, and sometimes just outright frauds. In other words, things that just aren’t working. The deeply disturbing events of Saturday – which in the best-case scenario were a complete failure of management – had me thinking about these things this past weekend… The ITER nuclear fusion reactor is a great example of one of those failures. Because it’s a good illustration of so much of what is wrong right now. ITER Grows in All the Wrong Ways ITER – short for the European-led International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor – is a multinational collaboration between China, Europe, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the U.S. Source: ITER Currently under construction about 70 kilometers northwest of Marseille, France, ITER is building a massive, 23,000-metric-ton tokamak fusion reactor. This type of reactor requires absolutely huge, complex magnets to contain what will hopefully be a net energy-producing fusion reaction. I remember when the project was announced almost 20 years ago. Its original budget of 5 billion euros for 10 years of development, with plans to have ITER operational by 2016, was a massive budget at that time. But by 2010, when the construction of the facility shown in the picture above began, the cost estimate was increased to 15 billion euros. By 2011, already experiencing construction delays, first plasma was pushed back from the original target of 2016 to 2019. And by 2014, after already spending billions of euros, an independent report warned that the project was in “a malaise.” It recommended a management overhaul. Two years later, the ITER Council pressed the reset button… and pushed out first plasma until 2025, a target that is almost a decade later than the original 2016 target. 34th ITER Council (Source: ITER) Estimated project costs had since exploded to 20 billion euros – four times the original forecast. But this year, there had finally been some material progress with ITER… Most notably, it was the manufacturing and delivery of the massive, toroidal field coils… which are built in sections and assembled to create the donut-shaped chamber typical of tokamak reactors capable of confining a fusion plasma hotter than the surface of the sun. Source: SIMIC These toroidal field coils are huge, powerful magnets measuring 17 by 9 meters and weighing about 320 tons. That’s about as heavy as an Airbus A350. Earlier this summer, the last of the coils was delivered to ITER. These were the most complex pieces of the overall reactor to manufacture, and they therefore represented a major milestone. ITER management and its member countries cheered the milestone, indicating that the overall project was 70% completed. But there’s just one major problem… The Quiet Part ITER is nowhere near being finished. And we discovered that the management of the project is far worse than originally thought. In the 34th ITER Council meeting, which was conducted a few weeks ago, we received news of the worst delays in the project’s history. The tokamak fusion reactor will not achieve first operation until 2034, about a decade after the previous plan. But it’s far worse than it appears. First operation is just the point at which ITER will power up the reactor and begin to conduct experiments. It will not be the point at which the fusion reactor will be capable of creating and maintaining a nuclear fusion reaction with a net energy output. The first experiments for creating an actual deuterium-tritium-fueled fusion reaction are pushed back all the way out to 2039. That’s 15 years into the future. Oh, and the delay is expected to cost an additional 5 billion euros, bringing the total up to 25 billion euros. But I don’t believe those numbers for a second. A 15-year delay will result in much higher overall costs. I actually wrote the following on May 1 in [Outer Limits – Cheap Limitless Clean Energy Over War]( Oh, and the project’s costs have ballooned to 20 billion euros, already four times the original plan. And I can all but guarantee that the final number will be billions more. I just didn’t think I’d be proven right that quickly. I’m just going to say the quiet part out loud. I’m going to say what many scientists are thinking but are scared to say due to retribution… Why bother? ITER was conceived in 1985 and established in 2006, already embroiled in bureaucracy and big government think. And the entire private nuclear fusion industry went in exactly the opposite direction. The answer to limitless, cheap, clean energy isn’t 25-billion-euro nuclear fusion reactors that take decades to build. The industry saw the future in a different light: A much faster path to first light. Out Loud Smaller, modular nuclear fusion reactors can be built in years rather than decades. And venture capital, private equity, and private investors have stepped up – and continue to step up – to fund that vision. The solution is already here. So again, why bother? Why waste the taxpayer dollars, euros, yen, renminbi, rupee, won, and rubles? Why waste the scientific talent working on this largely irrelevant science experiment? Why not focus our energies on nuclear fusion technology and projects that have very near future potential for first light, and a clear path towards commercialization? My humble advice, shut ITER down. Take a fraction of the funding that has already been allocated and invest in private companies and public research with a concrete path towards producing limitless, baseload clean energy. Enough of this hypocritical nonsense from the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its partner organizations about achieving net zero. It is being used to justify government appropriation of farms and agricultural land from Dutch farmers, a need to implement social credit systems to control citizen behavior, a need to restrict annual travel to reduce carbon emissions, a need to reduce consumption of meat to reduce methane emissions... While at the same time, burning copious amounts of fossil fuels and using untold amounts of toxic chemicals at unthinkable environmental costs to produce solar panels and wind turbines that end up in landfills after their limited use. “They” want to [decelerate us](. They want us to limit our activities. They want to control our lifestyles. They want to limit our movement. They want us to take their experimental drugs. We, the people, want to live free. We want the freedom to build, to create, to innovate, to integrate, to live in happiness amongst each other, and to develop limitless, clean energy for all as quickly as we can. There are certainly powerful people and organizations that don’t want us to have limitless, cheap clean energy. If private industry is leading, it makes it much harder to engage in the kind of grift and corruption that benefit the elites that come from government largess. And there is a whole lot of industry that would be disrupted if we did. Some will try to stop that from happening. But the tide has turned. The direction is clear. We have a path forward. And you can be sure, I’ll be covering every company in the space that is working towards making this happen right here in The Bleeding Edge, and in my premium research services at Brownstone Research. Together, we will take part in paving the way forward. It’s time to accelerate. It’s time for the people to take back control. It’s time to fight, fight, fight! --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@brownstoneresearch.com. [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2024 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

09/10/2024

Sent On

09/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

05/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.