Newsletter Subject

The $7 Trillion Investment of a Lifetime

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Jul 5, 2024 08:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Editor?s Note: If you caught yesterday?s , you?ll already know the Brownstone offices are clos

[The Bleeding Edge]( Editor’s Note: If you caught yesterday’s [Bleeding Edge – Manifested AI]( you’ll already know the Brownstone offices are closed for the weekend to celebrate Independence Day. So – until we return Monday with our standard fare – we’re taking that opportunity to spotlight some of Jeff’s more significant research from the past few months… So, today, we’re featuring an issue he published on a pivotal move made more than a decade ago by one of the leaders in today’s thriving semiconductor industry… And how the industry shift it set in motion now presents a $7 trillion investment opportunity. Read on for all the details from Jeff… --------------------------------------------------------------- The $7 Trillion Investment of a Lifetime By Jeff Brown, Editor, The Bleeding Edge Amid the global financial crisis, one of the most pivotal deals in the semiconductor industry went down. The world had more than its share of things to worry about at the time. With stock markets crashing and financial institutions collapsing, the deal was easy to miss amongst all the chaos unless you were in the semiconductor industry. [Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)]( made a bold move. It spun out its semiconductor manufacturing plants in late 2008 into a $5.7 billion joint venture with Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC). ATIC was basically a venture capital arm of Abu Dhabi, making the deal that much more interesting. After all, Abu Dhabi, the capital of the U.A.E., was known for oil, not semiconductors. It was a strategic move by AMD to get out of manufacturing. And it was also a move of necessity. As a smaller semiconductor company competing with the giant Intel, AMD had basically run out of money trying to both design and manufacture its semiconductors. If it kept spending on semiconductor manufacturing, it would have likely collapsed… hence the joint venture to get out of manufacturing. The deal signaled an even larger shift in the semiconductor industry: An explosion of fabless semiconductor companies. Fabless As the name suggests, fabless means that a semiconductor company has no manufacturing facilities of its own. “Fab” is short for semiconductor fabrication plant. Being fabless meant being able to focus on semiconductor design, marketing, and sales… and not having to worry about the massive capital expenditures and operational expenses of building and maintaining fabs. This shift radically impacted the semiconductor industry structure. It put [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp. (TSMC)]( in a dominant position as the world’s leading contract manufacturer for semiconductors. There was also [Intel (INTC)]( but its manufacturing was focused on producing its own products. That left Samsung’s semiconductor manufacturing, which had primarily been focused on semiconductors for computer memory, and United Microelectronics (UMC) – another Taiwan-based contract manufacturer – focused on less advanced semiconductor manufacturing. That’s why the industry welcomed the new joint venture for semiconductor manufacturing between AMD and ATIC, which ultimately became known as [Global Foundries (GFS)](. Global Foundries represented some hope that there would be an alternative to dominant TSMC for leading-edge contract semiconductor manufacturing. This spin-out turned out to be an incredible success for AMD. While it took several years for the benefits to kick in, AMD took off like a rocket ship with much higher gross margins and sales. AMD had been one of my core recommendations to gain exposure to the explosion in artificial intelligence (AI) years ago. Chart of AMD, 2008-Present The same wasn’t true for Global Foundries, or the industry for that matter. After many restructurings and tens of billions of dollars spent, the company finally went public in October of 2021. Chart of Global Foundries (GFS) Since Its IPO Global Foundries today carries a $30 billion enterprise value (EV), standing in stark contrast to TSMC’s $515 billion EV – worth only about 6% of TSMC. The bigger problem for the industry, however, is that Global Foundries never became a legitimate alternative for producing leading-edge semiconductors for fabless semiconductor companies. The same was true for large high-tech companies like Tesla, Meta, Amazon, and others who wanted to design and produce their own chips. The reality is that TSMC’s largest customers – like Nvidia, Apple, and Qualcomm – take priority over smaller fabless companies, due to the scale of their business. This has long been the semiconductor industry’s largest pain point. And it has become exacerbated with the latest boom in artificial intelligence. On the Hunt for $7 Trillion In a very interesting development, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has been traveling lately… hunting for a lot of capital. He’s been speaking with potential investors to raise somewhere between $5-7 trillion (not a typo) to radically increase the semiconductor industry’s chip production, specifically for AI-specific semiconductors. The idea of increasing industry capacity is not new or radical at all… It’s the $5–7 trillion sum that is jaw-dropping. To put the figure in context, global sales for semiconductors in 2023 were $526.8 billion. $7 trillion is about 13 times last year’s global industry sales. And 2023 sales for semiconductor manufacturing equipment were “just” $100 billion. To use a more specific example, TSMC had announced its plans to build a leading-edge, 3 nanometer – that’s 3nm – fab in Arizona. The expected investment required is $40 billion to get the fab running by 2026. Assuming $7 trillion is successfully raised, that would be enough to build the equivalent of 175 3-nanometer fabs similar to what TSMC had planned in AZ. This figure alone gives us a sense of the incredible growth ahead in semiconductors. Industry insiders in the world of artificial intelligence, like Sam Altman at OpenAI, believe that trillions of dollars need to be invested in semiconductor manufacturing in order to keep up with future demand for these AI-specific chips. The truth is that the global semiconductor manufacturing base doesn’t have the capacity to meet the demand for what’s coming. There are already massive supply constraints for the workhorses of artificial intelligence – GPUs – that have allowed Nvidia and AMD to set their own prices. Nvidia is now the most valuable semiconductor company in the world with an enterprise valuation of $1.77 trillion. Nvidia was one of my core AI recommendations made back in early 2016 at $24 a share. Just have a look at where we are today. 5-Year Chart of Nvidia (NVDA) One of the questions I often get is, “Jeff, am I too late?” Or, “I wish I had listened to you and bought AMD, Nvidia, and Tesla. What can I do now? Is the party over?” All I can say is that the AI party is just getting started. Investment of a Lifetime There is a need to spend trillions of dollars on the foundational technology that enables AI. This includes the foundational software like what OpenAI is building with GPT-4 and its future derivatives, as well as the AI-specific semiconductors. GPUs are great for the kind of brute-force computing required to train an AI… but that’s only a fraction of what the world will need. AI-specific semiconductors are required at the edge of networks, in our smartphones, in our cars, in our smart glasses, and in our health monitors. Just about any consumer electronics device that we use throughout the day will benefit from having an AI chip. These are small, energy-efficient chips that run AI software and typically enable something called inference. They enable a device to infer the correct action or output. We can think of them as a lightweight piece of technology to be used “in the field” capable of “thinking,” as opposed to the massive data centers required to run and train an AI in the cloud. And that’s not to mention the kind of growth we’ll see in companies that rapidly employ AI technology to improve their own operations and offer new products and services. Two perfect examples of that are two other past recommendations of mine, Meta (META) and Salesforce (CRM), both of which are hovering around all-time highs. The next wave of hot AI companies will be incredible. Some of these companies are public. Many are still private and looking for a window to access the public markets with an IPO. Some notable private fabless semiconductor companies for us to watch are [Cerebras]( [Graphcore]( [Lightmatter]( [Groq]( [d-Matrix]( [Rain AI]( [SambaNova]( and [Extropic](. And that’s just scratching the surface. Not surprisingly, Sam Altman has had discussions in the U.A.E. He has also spent some time with the CEO of Softbank, which still owns about 90% of ARM Holdings (ARM). ARM is known for its highly optimized semiconductor architectures — high-performance designs capable of low power consumption. That’s made ARM’s semiconductors ideal for mobile devices… or any device requiring lower power consumption. These discussions are relevant, as AI-specific chips can be designed using ARM semiconductor architectures. Better yet, TSMC is also involved in the discussions. This makes perfect sense, as there is no other company more experienced in manufacturing at the outer limits of semiconductor manufacturing technology. It is hard for me to imagine a multitrillion-dollar deal where TSMC isn’t involved. And there’s more. The backdrop of this Altman-led initiative isn’t just the industry capacity problems, as I’ve explained above. It’s the acknowledgment that [China will take control of Taiwan]( thus the urgent need to build new fabs on U.S. and European soil. Supply chain resiliency is critical for the global economy, and a necessity for those building a new world full of AI. Altman’s initiative is also a recognition that the current administration’s $52 billion CHIPS Act isn’t going to do it. To date, it has been a grossly failed piece of policy having only distributed relatively small sums to support mature semiconductor technology, not the kind needed for AI. The reality is that AI software is racing ahead at an accelerated pace. And the semiconductor industry is scrambling to develop the hardware (semiconductors) to fuel the growth. This isn’t a problem the government can solve. It moves too slowly. It is far too inefficient. The industry, and those with vast financial resources, are now rolling their sleeves up to make the investment of a lifetime. --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@brownstoneresearch.com. [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2024 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

EDM Keywords (205)

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.