Newsletter Subject

A Reality Check on Intel’s New Chip

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Wed, Apr 10, 2024 08:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Colin?s Note: The mainstream financial media headlines are all screaming about the new Intel Gaudi

[The Bleeding Edge]( Colin’s Note: The mainstream financial media headlines are all screaming about the new Intel Gaudi 3 artificial intelligence (AI) chip… About how Intel is gunning for Nvidia… going toe-to-toe with the semiconductor company leading the AI hardware race… and that Intel’s “AI game-changer” offers a competitive alternative to Nvidia’s popular H100 chip… That Intel has challenged Nvidia’s industry dominance. Yeah, right. If you take Intel's benchmarks – and press release – at face value, you might be convinced. After all, that’s exactly what the media has done. But dive with me into the details, and you’ll see that Intel still has miles to go if it wants to get in step with Nvidia… let alone dream of outperforming it. It’s all in today’s video. Click below to watch… or read on for the transcript my team and I have edited for flow. [Video]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Bleeding Edge subscribers, hopefully, guys are doing well. If you read the headlines yesterday, you might be pretty impressed. Here are just a few… Intel Unveils Latest AI Chip as Nvidia Competition Heats Up – CNBC Intel Launches Gaudi 3 With Impressive Gen AI Performance – Forbes Intel Brings the Fight to Nvidia – TipRanks These headlines followed when Intel unveiled its Gaudi 3 AI accelerator chip yesterday. And the financial news media did what they do best… They simply read a press release from Intel and regurgitated it. It wouldn't surprise me if some of these articles and headlines were simply plugged into ChatGPT and cranked out for you, the investor, to read. The truth is, if you believe Intel's press release at face value the way the financial news sites did, you'd actually believe Intel might have a legitimate competitor to Nvidia's dominance. But to borrow a phrase coined by a former president, that would be fake news. Intel claims their Gaudi 3 chip delivers an average of 50% better inference capabilities and 40% better power efficiency than Nvidia’s H100 chip… at a fraction of the cost. Now, that last part is believable. Nvidia has been printing impressive 80% gross margins ever since the A100 and H100 AI computer chips became hot commodities in the tech world. But is the Gaudi 3 really a bleeding-edge AI computer chip set to take market share from Nvidia? Trusting Intel's benchmarks and press release at face value, you might think that's the case. But diving into the details shows Intel is still more than a step behind Nvidia in terms of performance. Intel claimed their new Gaudi 3 chip delivers 50% faster time to train on average across Llama2 models with 7 billion and 13 billion parameters. Llama2 is one of the most popular open-source large language models (LLMs). It was developed and trained by Meta, the parent company behind Facebook and Instagram. However, the fact that Intel singled out the 7 billion and 13 billion-parameter models for training – and not the larger 70 billion-parameter Llama model – tells you everything you need to know. The fact that Gaudi 3 can cruise through the smaller 7 billion and 13 billion-parameter models better than the Nvidia chip isn't all that surprising. Similar to how a Honda would perform equally as well as a Ferrari driving around the neighborhood streets at 35 miles per hour, it's not a surprise Intel could meet or exceed Nvidia's performance. The fact that Intel didn't tout the chip’s performance on the larger parameter for the compute-intensive training task is the same reason Honda doesn't claim it can outperform a Ferrari on a freeway or a racetrack. Another aspect of these benchmarks that the financial media just failed to single out is the fact that the Llama2 model is about to become obsolete. Meta announced today that the company's latest Llama 3 LLM is expected to be released in the next few weeks. So by the time the Gaudi 3 chip comes to market, most AI companies will be training on a new model by then. But the idea Intel is ready to bring the fight to Nvidia is even more laughable when you consider Intel's comparisons with Nvidia’s H100 GPU. Last month, Nvidia announced the successor to the H100 GPU – the GB200. Nvidia claims the newest GB200 chip is 30 times faster than the H100 for inference and four times faster for training. Nvidia claims that instead of running LLMs with billions of parameters, the new GB200 chip will be capable of running trillion-parameter models. The reality is Nvidia has been well out in front of the entire semiconductor industry when it comes to accelerated computing AI data center chips. And it's not just Intel lagging way behind. If the financial news media had any interest in actually informing you, rather than just regurgitating Intel’s claims, they would tell you this. But the reality is that Intel's problems don't just end with Nvidia. The fact that Intel is at least a step behind Nvidia doesn't surprise anyone with some knowledge about the semiconductor industry. The reality is Intel's financials paint a picture of a semiconductor company in a desperate situation. The company's data center business – which includes sales of previous-generation Gaudi chips – is down 20% over the past year. And it's not just Nvidia eating Intel's lunch with higher-performance data center GPUs. At one time, Intel was the gold standard for CPU computer chips in PCs and data centers. But for years, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has been capturing market share in both of these areas. But it gets worse for Intel… because further competition is coming. Google's announcement of its Axion processors didn't get much attention from the financial press this week. But these Arm-based CPU chips are designed to replace Intel's X86-based CPU chips in data centers. Not only is Intel several laps behind Nvidia, but the company is falling behind in its bread-and-butter CPUs business as well. The bottom line is that over the next couple of weeks, there will be thousands of press releases related to AI. It's the financial news media's job to rewrite them with the most clickbait-style and interesting headlines possible. They're not really trying to inform you. But just understand to get a true idea of what is actually happening, you have to dive into the details. Intel is well behind its peers across the board. The company’s best days are now well behind it. That was The Bleeding Edge for today. We'll be back again later this week. Bye for now. --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@brownstoneresearch.com. [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2024 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.