Newsletter Subject

Ian is a wake-up call on the real costs of climate paralysis

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Sun, Oct 2, 2022 12:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

After a sleepy start to the North Atlantic hurricane season, Ian jolted us all awake.By the time you

After a sleepy start to the North Atlantic hurricane season, Ian jolted us all awake.By the time you read this, the storm will have torn thr [Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( After a sleepy start to the North Atlantic hurricane season, Ian jolted us all awake. By the time you read this, the storm will have torn through the Carolinas and possibly beyond. But all we can see at the moment is the devastation left behind in Florida. As of Friday morning, at least 15 people have been confirmed dead, some 2.6 million homes and businesses are without power and two bridges have collapsed. [Photos]( show the extent of the destruction: trees flattened, streets littered with debris and homes soaked in sewage-tainted water. As we clean up after Ian, it’s impossible to shake off a single, devastating fact: This won’t be the last time, and it won’t be the worst time. Ian is a reminder that we’ve got to start spending to adapt to and mitigate climate change. Estimates of Ian’s damage range in the tens of billions to as much as [$100 billion](. But even at the lower end of estimates, it would be one of the most expensive hurricanes in US history. Storms have become increasingly more expensive over the past few decades, partly because climate change is altering the hurricanes themselves. Take Ian, for example, which demonstrated a worrying trend: rapid intensification. Its wind speed more than doubled in just 48 hours, from 75 miles per hour to 155mph, as warm water, moist air and low wind shear gave the storm more energy and destructive power. As the planet gets warmer and wetter, such conditions will become commonplace. Increasing power isn’t the only thing that’s worrying about this. Over the years, improvements in hurricane forecasting have vastly [decreased the number of people who die in such disasters](. But if we’ve no idea how intense a storm might get, or if it surprises us, people will have less time to prepare or evacuate — actions that save lives. Another cause of rising storm costs may boil down to an innate human desire to live by the sea. As this FEMA map shows, coastal areas tend to be more at risk of natural hazards — including hurricanes, wildfires and flooding. Of course, FEMA chief Deanne Criswell has said [climate change has already made this map outdated](, particularly when it comes to flooding. First Street Foundation, a nonprofit research group, identified an extra 6 million homes that should be in severe flood-risk zones. With this in mind, consider that, as Mark Gongloff notes, [the fastest-growing US cities are also among those most vulnerable to the effects of climate change](. Fort Myers, whose population has grown by 124% in the past 30 years, has just been laid to waste by Ian’s historic storm surge. The allure of these locations is obvious — they’re beautiful, warm and economically booming. Miami and Tampa are vying to become [America’s next tech and finance hubs](. But Florida’s [addiction to coastal development]( puts more people and buildings in harm’s way. It stands to reason that, if you keep building sea-view condos, you’ll also have to pay to repair them when the sea ends up in the living room. As Tim Chapin, professor of urban and regional planning at Florida State University [told]( Politico: “From a long-range planning point of view, much of what we see today in southwest Florida should not be there.” Money would be more efficiently spent on adapting Florida’s coastline to a changing climate. That doesn’t necessarily mean adding more concrete sea walls, nor does it mean sacrificing economic growth. But [it might mean seeing growth in a new light](. Mark Buchanan went to a lecture by Cambridge University economist Partha Dasgupta, in which a key question was raised: “How did economic theory get itself into a condition in which it doesn't even count the natural world as an important part of our economic wealth?” It might have made sense in the early days of growth theory. But now that we understand more of the importance of biodiversity and ecosystems to society’s health, it’s plainly a huge oversight. Dasgupta’s revised theory still considers economic growth a positive, but sees it as something far more inclusive than GDP, something that must preserve the value of the natural world for prosperity to continue. And incredible things can happen when you invest in nature. As Frank Wilkinson notes, a recent study found [mangrove forests were a significant factor in protecting property]( during Hurricane Irma in 2017. The coastal jungles averted an estimated $1.5 billion in surge-related flood damage, representing savings of about 25% in counties protected by mangroves. With all the discussion of price tags and infrastructure, it’s easy to forget the other, less tangible but no less important costs of these intensifying weather events: the destruction of lives and livelihoods, of homes and memories. Climate action and adaptation will cost money, but doing nothing will cost far more. More climate reads: [Driving Teslas in California is really, really expensive](, which Liam Denning points out is weirdly at odds with California’s electric vehicle goals. David Fickling explains what the [third energy crisis is really creating: gasoline in decline and renewables on the rise](. More data from Bloomberg Opinion: John Authers charts all the ways the [world’s financial markets are falling apart](. Andrea Felsted has all the ways Brits are investing their money. [Think blankets, jumpers and duvets](. [Instagram: A post shared by Bloomberg Opinion (@...]( [Instagram: A post shared by Bloomberg Opinion (@...]( Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( | [Ad Choices]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.