Biden mostly delivered what he promised

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. The most memorable parts of President Joe Biden’s first address to a joint session of Congress had nothing to do with him. The first was the half-empty room, a consequence of the pandemic. The second? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Kamala Harris together on the dais, historic symbols of a changing nation and a changing political party. To note that nothing Biden said was as memorable isn’t a criticism; it’s rare that anything in this format makes that kind of history. And Biden didn’t do a bad job. He explained what he’s done, and what he plans to do, in the context of what he promised during the campaign. So, for example: Biden promised a return to normal politics after the tumult and weirdness of the previous four years? He delivered a by-the-book, laundry-list speech, light on boasting and grievances and heavy on traditional patriotism and democratic symbolism. He promised mainstream liberal policy choices? He went through one after another, generally emphasizing themes that poll well. And he promised empathy? Well, he once again delivered. In a lot of ways, though, the speech wasn’t really about Biden. We’re in an era of [partisan presidencies](, with even Trump mostly following the lead of Republicans in Congress and other party professionals. Biden, who has made a career of finding the center of the Democratic Party and moving to it without appearing to be pandering, shows no signs of departing from his colleagues. That doesn’t mean he’s irrelevant; after all, there are plenty of internal party disputes that need to be resolved, and policy details and personnel matter. But it’s easy to imagine several of the 2020 Democratic candidates giving much the same speech had they won. But if the substance wasn’t unique to Biden, the style to a large extent was. Most recent presidents have used such speeches as simply a different kind of setting to speak directly to the nation, with members of Congress basically acting as props. Biden’s style was more like Bill Clinton’s: He often acted as if he was mainly speaking to the people in the room, who are part of the joint project of governing. It’s no surprise that Democrats, who are more comfortable with the laundry-list type of speech, seem drawn to that style and the relatively plain, practical prose that goes with it. Similarly, it’s no surprise that Republicans tend toward the direct-to-voters style, since they’re usually on firmer ground with general statements of ideology and more poetic language. Again, I’m generalizing. But I do think that there’s something in the distinction between styles. Anyway, Biden seemed to deliver what he set out to do. The hard parts are still to come. 1. Andrew Aoki and Pei-te Lien at the Monkey Cage offer a reading list on [Asian American politics](. 2. Hans Noel at Mischiefs of Faction on the [intra-Democratic argument about “wokeness](.” 3. William Adler on [reapportionment](. 4. My Bloomberg Opinion colleague Ramesh Ponnuru [on housing](. 5. Glenn Kessler, Salvador Rizzo and Adriana Usero [fact-check Biden’s speech](. 6. Josh Kraushaar on [Trump and the House special election this Saturday in Texas](. 7. And Thomas Wright on [Biden and India](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022