Newsletter Subject

Has Facebook lost its voting drive?

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Thu, Aug 20, 2020 11:08 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/21258317.61570/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS90ZWNobm9

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/21258317.61570/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS90ZWNobm9sb2d5/582c8673566a94262a8b49bdBb28b7faf [Get the newsletter]( Hey all, it’s Kurt. Facebook Inc. and Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg have [promised]( to carry out the “largest voting information campaign in American history” – a pledge that includes a goal to register 4 million new voters ahead of November’s election. But a [new report]( Wednesday from the Tech Transparency Project called Facebook’s commitment into question based on internal emails obtained through public-records requests. Among the findings: Facebook scaled back a July 4 voting drive, cutting the two-day event to one day. It ran the campaign on Facebook, but not Instagram or Messenger as originally intended, and has not yet put the official voting hub atop user feeds as Zuckerberg promised to do back in June. When officials from Illinois asked the company to add language about mail-in voting to the campaign for users in their state, Facebook declined, saying it wanted to “generalize” the language instead. The Trump campaign criticized Facebook’s registration efforts a few weeks before the July 4 drive, and Trump himself is crusading against mail-in ballots. That raises “questions about whether the company pulled back on its ambitions after concerted pressure by the Trump campaign,” the TTP wrote. The emails don’t show that Facebook pulled back due to Trump, but TTP’s question is a fair one, and the emails raise others. If this is indeed the “largest voting information campaign in American history,” then why were the original plans scaled back? Why was Instagram, which has a younger user base perhaps more likely to vote Democrat, removed from the July 4 drive? Why wouldn’t Facebook add specific language about mail-in ballots in Illinois? This is, after all, a company that built an entire business on targeted messaging. A company spokesman denied that Facebook held back because of complaints from the Trump campaign. When someone on Twitter suggested Facebook changed its plans after a Trump complaint, a separate spokesman [tweeted]( back a picture of a woman in a tin foil hat. "We are running the largest voting information campaign in American history and are using the reach of our full platform to ensure people have reliable information about how to cast a ballot, where to vote, and why it’s essential to register," a Facebook spokesman said in a statement. "We have made no changes to this plan and any suggestion otherwise is pure fabrication by Facebook's paid critics." [The TTP]( is part of the Campaign for Accountability, a non-profit research group that investigates corporate influence in Washington. The TTP was formerly the Google Transparency Project, which published several critical studies of the internet giant. Oracle Corp., a rival of Google, [confirmed in 2016]( that was one of the funders of the project. Even if Facebook is not scaling back its voter drive, the company has sometimes seemed to bow to pressure from Trump and his allies. It has made exceptions for conservative news outlets that violate its rules, and in July a third-party auditor concluded that Facebook failed to enforce its own voter-suppression rules against posts from the President. There have also been hiccups that feed this perception: Hashtag searches for Democratic presidential challenger Joe Biden recently [returned positive hashtags]( about Trump, which Facebook blamed on a software bug. “When you take this with some of the broader themes that have come out, there are a lot of questions as to the timing of some of the decisions that were made in this voter registration drive,” says Katie Paul, director of the TTP. “These are all valid questions that are being asked.” If you read one thing [California’s Rich and Desperate Homeowners Are Buying an Unproven Wildfire Cure]( As climate change exacerbates fire risk, desperate homeowners are turning to unproven fixes to protect their property -- including a fire prevention spray that can costs tens of thousands of dollars. Sponsored Content by CrowdStrike The world’s most trusted organizations partner with [Crowdstrike]( to stop data breaches. We stop. So you can go. [Crowdstrike]( secures the data and infrastructure that keeps the world running. That’s why we’re a trusted partner of the world’s most important organizations. We stop. So you can go.  And here’s what you need to know in global technology news [Facebook Removes Hundreds of QAnon Groups, Limits Thousands More]( Facebook Inc. removed or restricted hundreds of Pages, accounts and Groups linked to the far-right conspiracy group QAnon thanks to an expanded policy related to dangerous groups. [Tech Execs Rally Behind Harris as Known Quantity for VP Pick]( Democratic Vice Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris has a lot of support inside the tech industry. [Palantir Moves Headquarters to Denver From Silicon Valley]( Tech employees aren't the only ones fleeing the Bay Area. Palantir Technologies Inc., the data-mining company founded by Peter Thiel and on the verge of going public, is moving its headquarters to Denver. [Apple-Fortnite Judge Backed iPhone Maker in a Similar 2013 Case]( Apple Inc.’s showdown with Fortnite maker Epic Games Inc. over app store fees has landed with a judge who gave the iPhone maker a big victory seven years ago in a case raising similar antitrust issues.  Like Fully Charged? | [Get unlimited access to Bloomberg.com](, where you'll find trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Fully Charged newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

22/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.