Newsletter Subject

Bitcoin going even higher? Ask your robot for advice

From

bloomberg.com

Email Address

noreply@news.bloomberg.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 6, 2024 10:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: Put your money where the mid-cap stocks are This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, a strategic reser

Plus: Put your money where the mid-cap stocks are [Bloomberg]( This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, a strategic reserve of Bloomberg Opinion’s opinions. [Sign up here](. Today’s Agenda - A strategic [Bitcoin]( reserve is a strategic blunder. - AI is coming for your [quant job](. - [Mid-cap]( stocks deserve a look. Strategic Cronyism Reserve The US has reserves of petroleum and precious metals, and President-elect Donald Trump has toyed with the idea of creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve too. Some people think it’s a good diversifier in portfolios, and it has generally gone up in value, so why shouldn’t Uncle Sam get in on the action? What could possibly be the downside of turning the US government into a crypto hedge fund? Anything at all come to mind? Bloomberg Opinion columnist Bill Dudley has a few thoughts. He [writes]( that, the Bitcoin reserve idea would probably send prices soaring, and “it's thus easy to see why current Bitcoin holders love the idea.” As you may recall, Bitcoin already surged past $100,000 earlier this week, fueled by Trump’s cozy relationship with crypto boosters. The government’s seal of approval could bring in trillions of dollars of additional inflows to an asset with a finite supply. Translation: rich Bitcoin bros and Lamborghini’s in every Miami parking lot. Indeed, if everyone decided to allocate just 2% of their investment portfolios to Bitcoin, Bill figures that would push the value of the Bitcoin market to $5 trillion, or $250,000 a coin (up from about $101,000 at the time of writing.) Again, great if you already own the stuff! But what’s in it for the government and everyone else? “Nothing good,” writes Bill, who previously served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (before landing a proper gig as a writer of Bloomberg Opinion columns.) “There’s no exit strategy, so the purpose must be to push prices higher, not create value for the government — which would be stuck holding volatile tokens that produce no income.” For what it’s worth, Bill isn’t the only top economist to land on that view. Former US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers [dismissed]( the idea as “crazy” on Bloomberg Television’s Wall Street Week with David Westin. Robot Portfolio Managers Like everything in financial markets, crypto investing is tricky, but we might not be too far from the day when robots can provide investing advice and construct portfolios at least as well as fallible humans. Maybe. In a recent interview with Bloomberg Television, AQR Capital Management’s Cliff Asness said that the firm is using AI for core parts of its work, and that AI is “annoyingly better” than him at aspects of his job. “AI’s coming for me now,” he said. Aaron Brown, who worked at AQR for a decade, [writes]( that the “the dream of fully self-driving portfolios seems within reach.” He says that the past seven years or so — which Aaron dates to the publication of a paper called “Attention Is All You Need” in 2017 — have seen major improvements in AI’s usefulness. Instead of just using it for trade execution (just one step of the investing process), he says it’s now gotten much better at the other two key tasks of quant investors: identifying predictive factors in markets and “combining signals from those factors into optimal portfolios.” Aaron says that the big story on the horizon is the potential for different AI system types to talk to one another. “The synergy from combining three different AI systems should be much greater than the individual advantages in each step,” he writes. Telltale Charts: Stuck in the Middle With You Fortunately, it doesn’t take a robot financial advisor to succeed in today’s stock market. US stocks have been on an absolute tear lately, but one particular corner of the market that’s garnering a bit more attention heading into 2025 is mid-cap stocks — the ones that have neither gigantic market capitalizations nor small ones. Companies such as Sprouts Farmers Market Inc. or Comfort Systems USA Inc., a provider of heating and air conditioning systems, come to mind. I know, I know — those investments don’t sound as sexy as crypto or the high-flying artificial intelligence stocks, but it turns out they’ve delivered pretty sexy returns over the past 30 years. As I (Jonathan Levin) write in my [column]( today, they’ve done better than both large-caps and small-caps in that period. What’s more, they may be a bit of an antidote to fears about frothiness and overconcentration in the S&P 500, especially among the large-cap growth stocks known as the Magnificent 7. What explains their extraordinary run over the past three decades? Resilience. They are the tortoise in the Tortoise and the Hare fable. While they haven’t delivered fireworks very often, the index outperformed during the dot-com bust and its aftermath (2000-2005). And as a result, a $100,000 investment in mid-caps three decades ago would be worth around $3 million — $700,000 more than a similar investment in large caps! Not bad for the middle child of equity markets! Further Reading Democracy is [wobbling]( around the world. — Andreas Kluth Steer clear of the [disinformation]( on cow burps. — Lara Williams Work [requirements]( government aid don’t increase work. — Kathryn Anne Edwards That Honeywell [guidance]( cut is actually a good thing. — Thomas Black Is it possible that [Black Friday]( was too good for retailers? —Andrea Felsted ICYMI A [mystery disease]( in Congo Better testing for [bird flu](. TikTok's [uncertain future](. The Naval Academy's [new ruling](. Kickers The world’s [best cheddar](. [Rocky's]( look-alike contest. [Slingshot spiders]( are wild. Do an [illegal thing]( legally.  Notes: Please send your robot advisor’s favorite mid-cap stock picks to Jonathan Levin at JLevin20@bloomberg.net. [Sign up here]( and find us on [Bluesky]( [TikTok]( [Instagram]( [LinkedIn]( and [Threads](. Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Opinion Today newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloomberg.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.