Newsletter Subject

Musk’s X picks a side

From

bloomberg.com

Email Address

noreply@news.bloomberg.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 12, 2024 11:05 AM

Email Preheader Text

Hey all, it’s Kurt Wagner in Denver. X is pretty sure that Donald Trump won the debate, but fir

Hey all, it’s Kurt Wagner in Denver. X is pretty sure that Donald Trump won the debate, but first…Three things you need to know today:• Nvid [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Hey all, it’s Kurt Wagner in Denver. X is pretty sure that Donald Trump won the debate, but first… Three things you need to know today: • Nvidia customers are a bit tense waiting for chips, [CEO Jensen Huang says]( • OpenAI is in talks to raise money valuing the [startup at $150 billion]( • Hewlett Packard Enterprise is sounding out investors about a debt deal to help fund its [acquisition of Juniper Networks]( Donald Trump’s meme machine Tuesday night’s debate between Vice President [Kamala Harris](bbg://people/profile/6092699) and former President [Donald Trump](bbg://people/profile/1252249) was, by most accounts, a demonstration of Harris’ preparation and ability to bait Trump. CNN’s Jake Tapper equated Trump’s performance to “a 4Chan post come to life,” a reference to the site known for spreading conspiracies. Even Fox News analysts were [reluctant to declare Trump the winner]( a reality that seemed impossible just hours earlier. If you followed the debate on X, however, this would come as a shock. I opened the social network formerly known as Twitter and was bombarded with posts about how well Trump had performed. A few of these posts were coming from people I followed — namely, X owner [Elon Musk](bbg://people/profile/1954518), who seemed to be having a great time [building up Trump]( and [putting down Harris]( to his 197 million followers. But most of the posts were fed to me by X’s algorithm, including several from Donald Trump Jr. and Libs of TikTok, accounts I don’t follow. Musk is now a vocal and [aggressive Trump supporter and donor]( regularly tweeting in favor of the former president. As the most-followed account on X, Musk sets the tone for the entire service, and an ultra-conservative Musk has shifted the entire platform toward the political right. This week’s debate didn’t just confirm the reality of this shift, it also erased any lingering hope I had that X was still a useful and trustworthy source of information for major political events. Declaring Trump the victor in Tuesday’s debate is a subjective call; people will agree and disagree, and that’s certainly OK and expected. But X’s feed felt so incredibly one-sided — so detached from reality — that it rendered the service unusable for any kind of serious information or discussion about the most important political moment of this US election. There were clips of Trump “owning” Harris about the size of her rallies, and a seemingly endless stream of claims that the debate had been a 3-on-1 cage fight, with ABC News’ moderators clearly in Harris’ corner. I lost count of all the memes and AI-generated images of Trump — who alleged during the debate that undocumented immigrants were eating people’s [household pets]( in an Ohio town — protecting the area’s cats and dogs and ducks. And Trump backers pitched yet another conspiracy theory suggesting Harris was wearing special earrings with speakers in them so former President Barack Obama could feed her lines. The Twitter that Musk acquired in October 2022 had its faults, but the one thing it did best was serve as a global watercooler during major events. It was a place you could go to get commentary about what was going on— usually from all sides — and the platform’s old verification system made it easier to find authoritative voices that were elevated above the crowd. It wasn't perfect, but it wasn't just a repackaged version of Truth Social, either. Musk said when he bought X that he wanted to “[inform & entertain,]( and the X feed on debate night was indeed a spectacle. But he also [said]( he wanted X to be “by far the most accurate source of information about the world.” In that, Musk has failed — and I don’t think it’s even up for debate.—[Kurt Wagner](mailto:kwagner71@bloomberg.net) The big story Intel reaches a pivotal moment this week. The board of the chipmaker is considering whether to alter Chief Executive Officer Pat Gelsinger’s [turnaround effort]( including scaling back the multibillion-dollar factory projects he and the Biden administration are counting on. One to watch [Bloomberg’s Jason Schreier joins Bloomberg Technology to discuss Sony’s new PlayStation 5 Pro game console.]( Get fully charged AST Space Mobile, SpaceX’s tiny rival in the satellite business, faces its first key test with a launch [scheduled from Florida](. Sequoia sees bigger money in AI-linked [software than models](. IBM hit a record as investors seek a stable tech company with potential growth [from artificial intelligence](. More from Bloomberg Bloomberg’s Screentime in Hollywood: Media creators, curators, influencers and dealmakers will converge Oct. 9 and Oct. 10 at Bloomberg’s Screentime conference to define the next era in pop culture. In the race to find success in an increasingly fractured media landscape, the future of what we watch on our screens is up to anyone to decide. [Buy tickets here](. Get Bloomberg Tech weeklies in your inbox: - [Cyber Bulletin]( for coverage of the shadow world of hackers and cyber-espionage - [Game On]( for reporting on the video game business - [Power On]( for Apple scoops, consumer tech news and more - [Screentime]( for a front-row seat to the collision of Hollywood and Silicon Valley - [Soundbite]( for reporting on podcasting, the music industry and audio trends - [Q&AI]( for answers to all your questions about AI Follow Us Stay updated by saving our new email address Our email address is changing, which means you’ll be receiving this newsletter from noreply@news.bloomberg.com. Here’s how to update your contacts to ensure you continue receiving it: - Gmail: Open an email from Bloomberg, click the three dots in the top right corner, select “Mark as important.” - Outlook: Right-click on Bloomberg’s email address and select “Add to Outlook Contacts.” - Apple Mail: Open the email, click on Bloomberg’s email address, and select “Add to Contacts” or “Add to VIPs.” - Yahoo Mail: Open an email from Bloomberg, hover over the email address, click “Add to Contacts.” Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Tech Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloomberg.com

View More
Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

10/10/2024

Sent On

05/10/2024

Sent On

05/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.